Menu

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 vs Vredestein Ultrac Pro

In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 and the Vredestein Ultrac Pro to find out which tire is best for your own driving.

There are a few basic differences between the two tires. The Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is an Ultra-High-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Vredestein Ultrac Pro is an Max-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars

N-Fera-Sport-SU2 VS Ultrac-Pro

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of five total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2three
three wins
Vredestein Ultrac Protwo
two wins

While it might look like the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is better than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 stopped the vehicle in 0.68% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
34.96M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35.2M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
35M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
36.5M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
36.6M (+0.1M)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
35M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
34.4M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35.2M (+0.8M)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
33.9M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
34.2M (+0.3M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was 0.73% faster around a lap than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
108.3Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
109.1Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
114.7Km/H (-2.7Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
117.4Km/H
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
101.9Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
100.8Km/H (-1.1Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 stopped the vehicle in 2.51% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
37.24M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
38.2M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
30.9M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
31.2M (+0.3M)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
31M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
31M
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
48.3M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
48.8M (+0.5M)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
48.9M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
51.2M (+2.3M)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
27.1M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
28.8M (+1.7M)

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 2.6% less distance than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
38.5M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
37.5M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
38.5M (+1M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
37.5M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was 1.88% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
74.45Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
73.05Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
71.7Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.3Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
77.2Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74.8Km/H (-2.4Km/H)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was 1.28% faster around a wet circle than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
13.12s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
13.29s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
15.05s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
15.24s (+0.19s)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
11.18s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.33s (+0.15s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro floated at a 0.45% higher speed than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
87.7Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
88.1Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
78.3Km/H (-0.8Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79.1Km/H
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
79.6Km/H (-1.1Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80.7Km/H
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
105.2Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
104.5Km/H (-0.7Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro slipped out at a 6.38% higher speed than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
2.64m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
2.82m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
3m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3m/sec2
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
2.94m/sec2 (-0.41m/sec2)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3.35m/sec2
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
1.99m/sec2 (-0.12m/sec2)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
2.11m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
5 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tires performed equally well

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
5 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5 Points

Noise

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during two noise tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 measured 0.59% quieter than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
72dB
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72.43dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
71.3dB
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.8dB (+0.5dB)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
72.1dB
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
73.5dB (+1.4dB)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
72.6dB (+0.6dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72dB

Wear

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is predicted to cover 6.94% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
39240KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
36515KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
43700KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
40100KM (-3600KM)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
34780KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
32930KM (-1850KM)

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during two value tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 proved to have a 19.77% better value based on price/1000km than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
9.13Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.38Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
9.06Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.57Price/1000 (+2.51Price/1000)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
9.2Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.18Price/1000 (+1.98Price/1000)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro had a 0.69% lower rolling resistance than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
8.66kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.6kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
8.41kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
9.19kg / t (+0.78kg / t)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
8.9kg / t (+0.9kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 used 1.75% less fuel than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
5.6l/100km
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.7l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
5.6l/100km
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.7l/100km (+0.1l/100km)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 emitted 1.06% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
74.7mg/km/t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
75.5mg/km/t
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
74.7mg/km/t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
75.5mg/km/t (+0.8mg/km/t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Driver Reviews

For the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, most high-scoring reviews praise strong dry and wet grip, predictable handling, acceptable comfort for some, and excellent value. However, a significant portion of mid/low-scoring reviews report fast shoulder wear, durability/quality issues, and higher noise/harshness, especially over time. Overall sentiment is mixed but leans slightly positive due to several very high-rated performance-focused reviews, while longevity and refinement remain common concerns.

Based on 17 reviews with an average rating of 70%

Vredestein Ultrac Pro Driver Reviews

Drivers largely praise the Vredestein Ultrac Pro for strong dry and wet grip, confident handling, and notably good ride comfort, with several noting premium feel and value. High-scoring reviews highlight short braking distances, stability, and decent wear for aggressive or heavy vehicles. A minority report concerns include poor performance in very cold (sub-5°C) conditions and one case of premature wear/delamination. Overall, the Ultrac Pro delivers balanced performance with comfort-focused tuning and attractive design.

Based on 6 reviews with an average rating of 81%

Best Review for the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Given 93% 225/45 R17 W on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
Insane dry handling and wet handling! Very good tire for cool amount of money :D
Helpful 1095 - tire reviewed on August 10, 2020
View all Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Given 97% 245/40 R18 on a combination of roads for 300 spirited miles
I do a lot of research when I buy tires , I looked all around for a premium summer tire which would be suitable for my driving style, and for the condition of the roads in my country - Eastern Europe. I looked at the PilotSport 5, ContiSportContact 7 , Eagle F1 Assymetric - all of which have a very high rating overrall, but I felt that they weren't suitable for the road conditions - lots of bumps ,cracks on the roads, patches and lets never forget about the potholes. They say the PS5 doesn't really absorb much of the bumps and has a low aquaplaning score, which doesn't do the job for me. I... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1121 - tire reviewed on June 17, 2024
View all Vredestein Ultrac Pro driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 performed better in dry braking, wet braking, wet handling [km/h], wet circle, noise, wear, value, fuel consumption and abrasion, while the Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed better in dry handling [km/h], wet braking - concrete, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning and rolling resistance.

Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in dry handling, wet handling and subj. comfort, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.

Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 seems to be the best tire overall.

However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.

Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Overall Winner: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.