Menu

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Vredestein Ultrac Pro

In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and the Vredestein Ultrac Pro to find out which tire is best for your own driving.

The good news is that both the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro are Max Performance Summer tires designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars, which means comparing the two tires is relatively simple.

Both tires are hugely popular in the market place with drivers, and both have been featured in independent tire tests.

Pilot-Sport-5 VS Ultrac-Pro

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of seven total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Michelin Pilot Sport 5seven
seven wins

While it might look like the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is better than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 2.39% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
34.25M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35.09M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
33.5M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M (+1.5M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
33.5M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M (+1.5M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
35.5M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
36.6M (+1.1M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
33.5M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M (+1.5M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
34.97M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35.62M (+0.65M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
34.4M (+0.2M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
34.2M
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
34.4M (+0.2M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
34.2M

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed equally well in dry handling [s] tests.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
69.6s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
69.6s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Both tires performed equally well

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
69.6s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
69.6s

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 1.53% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
110.9Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
109.2Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
120.5Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
117.4Km/H (-3.1Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
101.3Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
101Km/H (-0.3Km/H)

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scored 9.29% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
7 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
6.35 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
4 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
4 Points
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
10 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.7 Points (-1.3 Points)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 7.35% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
34.27M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
36.99M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
27.7M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
31.2M (+3.5M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
44.4M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
47.3M (+2.9M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
29.2M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
31M (+1.8M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
43.2M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
48.8M (+5.6M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
24.37M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
26.82M (+2.45M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
27.7M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
28.8M (+1.1M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
43.3M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
45M (+1.7M)

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 5.87% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
35.3M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
37.5M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
35.3M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
37.5M (+2.2M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 2.48% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
70.8s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72.6s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
70.8s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72.6s (+1.8s)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 1.54% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
78Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76.8Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73.3Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.3Km/H (-2Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
82.7Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82.3Km/H (-0.4Km/H)

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scored 9.09% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5.5 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
2 Points (-1 Points)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8 Points

Wet Circle

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 2.09% faster around a wet circle than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
13.59s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
13.88s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
11.2s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.71s (+0.51s)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
14.83s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
15.24s (+0.41s)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
14.74s (+0.05s)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
14.69s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 floated at a 0.74% higher speed than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
81.26Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80.66Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
75.7Km/H (-0.9Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76.6Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79.9Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79.1Km/H (-0.8Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
80.5Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80.7Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
78.2Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76.5Km/H (-1.7Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
92Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
90.4Km/H (-1.6Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 slipped out at a 3.92% higher speed than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3.32m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3.19m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3.25m/sec2 (-0.1m/sec2)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3.35m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3.72m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3.23m/sec2 (-0.49m/sec2)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5.83 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.83 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tires performed equally well

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
7 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
7 Points
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5 Points
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
4 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
4 Points
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
7.3 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
7.3 Points

Subj. Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed equally well in subj. noise tests.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
4 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
4 Points
Subjective in car noise levels, higher is better

Best In Subj. Noise: Both tires performed equally well

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
4 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
4 Points

Noise

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during four noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro measured 2.87% quieter than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73.18dB
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.08dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
71dB (+3dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
68dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73.1dB (+1.3dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.8dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
74.3dB (+0.8dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
73.5dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
74.3dB (+3.3dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71dB

Wear

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during four wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is predicted to cover 30.77% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
53310KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
36907.5KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
45000KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
32500KM (-12500KM)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
56400KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
40100KM (-16300KM)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
52170KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
32930KM (-19240KM)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
59670KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
42100KM (-17570KM)

Value

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three value tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 proved to have a 8.24% better value based on price/1000km than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
12.8Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
13.95Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
16.67Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
17.85Price/1000 (+1.18Price/1000)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
10.35Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.57Price/1000 (+1.22Price/1000)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8.74Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.18Price/1000 (+2.44Price/1000)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
15.42Price/1000 (+0.22Price/1000)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
15.2Price/1000

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 had a 1.93% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8.66kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.83kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8.85kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.85kg / t
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8.94kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
9.19kg / t (+0.25kg / t)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8.86kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
9.64kg / t (+0.78kg / t)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
7.97kg / t (+0.32kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
7.65kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 used 1.75% less fuel than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5.6l/100km
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.7l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5.6l/100km
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.7l/100km (+0.1l/100km)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 lost 16.33% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
1353g
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
1617g
Total weight loss after wear test in grams, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
1353g
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
1617g (+264g)

Real World Driver Reviews

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Driver Reviews

Across 89 reviews, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is widely described as an excellent all-round UHP summer tire with standout wet performance, strong dry grip, and high driver confidence at speed. Many drivers also praise its comfort/refinement and generally low road noise versus rival sporty tires, with a large portion reporting very good tread life for the category. The most repeated drawback is a less engaging steering feel (softer sidewalls, mild understeer, and reduced feedback) compared with sharper alternatives like Pilot Sport 4S/Continental SportContact 7, while price is a smaller but recurring complaint.

Based on 101 reviews with an average rating of 85%

Vredestein Ultrac Pro Driver Reviews

Drivers largely praise the Vredestein Ultrac Pro for strong dry and wet grip, confident handling, and notably good ride comfort, with several noting premium feel and value. High-scoring reviews highlight short braking distances, stability, and decent wear for aggressive or heavy vehicles. A minority report concerns include poor performance in very cold (sub-5°C) conditions and one case of premature wear/delamination. Overall, the Ultrac Pro delivers balanced performance with comfort-focused tuning and attractive design.

Based on 6 reviews with an average rating of 81%

Best Review for the Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Given 89% 225/40 R18 on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I've bought the new Michelin Pilot Sport 5 for my Golf R as I previously had the Pilot Sport 4 tires. What a fantastic difference these new tire are. Theres far less noise, the grip in the wet is better and the dry grip is almost the same if not better as well. I would definitely be buying these again.
Helpful 1723 - tire reviewed on January 12, 2022
View all Michelin Pilot Sport 5 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Given 97% 245/40 R18 on a combination of roads for 300 spirited miles
I do a lot of research when I buy tires , I looked all around for a premium summer tire which would be suitable for my driving style, and for the condition of the roads in my country - Eastern Europe. I looked at the PilotSport 5, ContiSportContact 7 , Eagle F1 Assymetric - all of which have a very high rating overrall, but I felt that they weren't suitable for the road conditions - lots of bumps ,cracks on the roads, patches and lets never forget about the potholes. They say the PS5 doesn't really absorb much of the bumps and has a low aquaplaning score, which doesn't do the job for me. I... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1137 - tire reviewed on June 17, 2024
View all Vredestein Ultrac Pro driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], subj. dry handling, wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [s], wet handling [km/h], subj. wet handling, wet circle, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, wear, value, rolling resistance, fuel consumption and abrasion, while the Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed better in noise.

Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in dry handling, wet handling, subj. comfort and subj. noise, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.

Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Michelin Pilot Sport 5 seems to be the best tire overall.

However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.

Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Overall Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Vredestein Ultrac Pro Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.