Menu

Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Vredestein Wintrac

The Firestone Winterhawk 4 and the Vredestein Wintrac have met in 6 independent tests and the record is level at 3-3. The Winterhawk 4 was stronger in wet and snow, the Wintrac in dry, ice and value.

Performance profile

13 measurements from the 6 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.

Dry BrakingDry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingWet CircleStraight AquaCurved AquaplaningSnow BrakingSnow TractionSnow HandlingNoiseWearRolling Resistance

Where each is furthest ahead

Winterhawk 4

Wintrac

Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.

In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.

Every measurement, side by side

Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.

Measurement Winterhawk 4 Gap Wintrac Wins
Dry Wintrac ahead
Dry Braking ft 154 6.4% 144 0-3
Dry Handling mph 75.9 1.3% 76.9 0-2
Wet Winterhawk 4 ahead
Wet Braking ft 140 3.6% 145 3-0
Wet Braking - Concrete ft 126 3.8% 131 1-0
Wet Handling mph 45.1 1.3% 45.7 0-2
Wet Circle s 12.8 1.1% 12.66 0-2
Straight Aqua mph 52.7 4.1% 50.6 3-0
Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² 11.3 9.7% 10.2 2-1
Snow Winterhawk 4 ahead
Snow Braking ft 85 1.7% 86 3-2
Snow Traction lbf 413 1.4% 402 1-2
Snow Handling mph 36.1 1% 35.7 2-0
Snow Slalom ft/s² 10.2 3.2% 10.6 0-1
Ice Wintrac ahead
Ice Braking ft 67 6.4% 63 0-1
Comfort Level
Noise dB 70.83 0.1 dB 70.93 1-1
Value Wintrac ahead
Wear miles 22,618 6% 24,109 1-2
Rolling Resistance kg / t 8.05 0.7% 7.99 0-2
Fuel Consumption l/100km 5.7 1.8% 5.6 0-1
Abrasion mg/km/t 89 30.3% 62 0-1

Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.

Head to head in 6 tests, 2021 to 2024

Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.

Test Winterhawk 4 Field Wintrac
2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild · 2024 · 205/55 R16 P18 of 20 P11 of 20
2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test Auto Bild · 2024 · 205/55 R16 P10 of 55 P17 of 55
2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test ADAC · 2023 · 205/60 R16 P7 of 16 P13 of 16
2022 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 ADAC · 2022 · 185/65 R15 P9 of 15 P5 of 15
2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild · 2021 · 205/55 R16 P10 of 20 P3 of 20
2021 Winter Tire Market Overview Auto Bild · 2021 · 205/55 R16 P5 of 50 P9 of 50

Winterhawk 4 vs Wintrac: your questions

Is the Firestone Winterhawk 4 or the Vredestein Wintrac the better tire?

The Firestone Winterhawk 4 and the Vredestein Wintrac have met in 6 independent tests and the record is level at 3-3. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winterhawk 4 scores 8.1 and the Wintrac 9.3 out of 10.

Which is better in the wet, the Winterhawk 4 or the Wintrac?

The Winterhawk 4 led 9 of the 16 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.6% shorter in the wet across 5 tests.

Which is better in the dry?

The Wintrac led 5 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6.4% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.

Which is better in snow?

The Winterhawk 4 led 6 of the 11 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.7% shorter on snow across 5 tests.

Which lasts longer and costs less to run?

The Wintrac lasted 6% longer in the wear tests (3 tests) and had 0.7% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.6/10 for the Winterhawk 4 and 8/10 for the Wintrac.

Which is quieter and more comfortable?

Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Winterhawk 4 and 8.8/10 for the Wintrac.

What do owners say?

Owners rate the Winterhawk 4 72% from 6 reviews and the Wintrac 88% from 5. 67% of Winterhawk 4 owners would buy it again, against 100% for the Wintrac.

Which is more expensive?

In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Wintrac was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 10.3% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.

Are they available in the same sizes?

The Winterhawk 4 is made in 83 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the Wintrac in 28 (15 to 19 inch). 23 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winterhawk 4 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Wintrac B and C.

Run either of these?

Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.

Review the Winterhawk 4 Review the Wintrac

Where this data comes from

Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.

About the TR Score

The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.

Who does the testing

Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.