Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Vredestein Quatrac
In the 8 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 8 times and the EUROALL SEASON AS210 not once. The Quatrac was stronger in dry, wet, snow, ice, comfort and value.
Performance profile
17 measurements from the 8 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 15 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Not ahead in any category
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the EUROALL SEASON AS210 80% from 33 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Gap | Quatrac | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Quatrac ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking - Cool ft | 135 | 5.8% | 128 | 0-1 |
| Dry Braking ft | 141 | 5% | 134 | 0-8 |
| Dry Handling - Cool s | 77.4 | 0.4% | 77.1 | 0-1 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 72.95 | 0.3% | 72.73 | 0-2 |
| Dry Handling (mph) | 58.7 | 0.8% | 59.2 | 0-3 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Wet Quatrac ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 157 | 3.7% | 150 | 4-4 |
| Wet Braking - Cool ft | 215 | 13.3% | 186 | 0-1 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 128 | 2.8% | 131 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling - Cool s | 93.9 | 3.8% | 90.3 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 62.14 | 0.4% | 62.4 | 1-1 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 43.6 | 3.2% | 45 | 0-3 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 5.6% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.31 | 2.3% | 12.03 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 50.3 | 0.1% | 50.3 | 3-3 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 10.9 | 2.3% | 10.6 | 2-0 |
| Snow Quatrac ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 80 | 1% | 79 | 2-4 |
| Snow Traction s | 6.1 | 3% | 5.92 | 0-1 |
| Snow Traction (lbf) | 446 | 4.1% | 457 | 0-3 |
| Snow Handling s | 58.9 | 0.6% | 58.35 | 0-1 |
| Snow Handling (mph) | 28.9 | 0.7% | 29.1 | 0-3 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | 3.3% | scored | 0-1 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 13.1 | 3.5% | 13.5 | 0-1 |
| Ice Quatrac ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking ft | 67 | 0.5% | 67 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Quatrac ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Noise dB | 71.68 | 0.9 dB | 70.82 | 0-4 |
| Tire Weight lb | 9,859 | 9.6% | 8,629 | 0-2 |
| Value Quatrac ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 34,594 | 0.9% | 35,084 | 1-2 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.9 | 11.1% | 7.92 | 0-5 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.6 | 3.8% | 5.38 | 0-2 |
| Abrasion (Gram/1000km) | 16.3 | 6.3% | 17.4 | 1-0 |
| Abrasion (mg/km/t) | 74 | 18.9% | 60 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 8 tests, 2020 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Field | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test | P7 of 16 | P6 of 16 | |
| 2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test | P7 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P8 of 15 | P2 of 15 | |
| 2022 All Season Tire Market Overview | P11 of 35 | P2 of 35 | |
| 2021 AZ All Season Tire Test | P8 of 9 | P1 of 9 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test | P6 of 11 | P1 of 11 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P5 of 14 | P2 of 14 | |
| 2020 All Season Tire Market Overview - 32 Tire Braking Test | P11 of 32 | P2 of 32 |
EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Quatrac: your questions
Is the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 or the Vredestein Quatrac the better tire?
In the 8 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 8 times and the EUROALL SEASON AS210 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 8.1 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the EUROALL SEASON AS210 or the Quatrac?
The Quatrac led 15 of the 26 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it averaged a 3.2% higher speed on the wet handling course across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Quatrac led 15 of the 16 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5% shorter in the dry across 8 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Quatrac led 14 of the 18 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1% shorter on snow across 6 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Quatrac lasted 0.9% longer in the wear tests (3 tests), had 11.1% lower rolling resistance (5 tests) and used 3.8% less fuel (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the EUROALL SEASON AS210 and 8.7/10 for the Quatrac.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Quatrac was 0.9 dB quieter (5 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.8/10 for the EUROALL SEASON AS210 and 7.9/10 for the Quatrac.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the EUROALL SEASON AS210 80% from 33 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. 84% of EUROALL SEASON AS210 owners would buy it again, against 86% for the Quatrac.
Which is more expensive?
In the 5 tests that listed prices, the Quatrac was the dearer tire in 4 of them, by 8.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The EUROALL SEASON AS210 is made in 93 sizes (13 to 20 inch) and the Quatrac in 39 (15 to 18 inch). 31 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the EUROALL SEASON AS210 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
3-12 in 16 shared tests
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
2-6 in 8 shared tests
vs
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Vredestein Quatrac
6-5 in 11 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.