Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs Vredestein Quatrac
- TR Score
- 8.3/10
- Owners say
- 67% · 6
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 30
In the 6 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 5 times and the Solus 4S HA32+ once. The Solus 4S HA32+ lasted 1.8% longer in the wear tests; the Quatrac stopped 6% shorter in the wet.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Vredestein Quatrac for year-round safety, wet-weather assurance, and precise handling; choose Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus if you prioritize snow/ice performance and lower upfront cost, accepting weaker aquaplaning reserves and longer wet/dry stops.
Where the Solus 4S HA32+ is stronger
- Snow 8/14 Stopped 2.7% shorter on snow (4 tests)
- Ice 1/1
Where the Quatrac is stronger
- Consistently shorter wet and dry braking (6/6 category wins in wet and dry braking)
- Outstanding aquaplaning resistance (notably +22-34% in curved tests)
- Balanced, precise handling with direct steering
The measured tallies (wins out of measurements in the shared tests) come straight from the tables below. The written verdict and bullet points are analysis of those tests and of owner reviews; where they and the figures disagree, the figures are right.
Solus 4S HA32+ vs Quatrac at a glance
| Category | Solus 4S HA32+ | Gap | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won6 shared tests | 1 | 5 | |
| Dry9 measurements | 1 | The Quatrac stopped 4.4% shorter in the dry (6 tests) | 8 |
| Wet21 measurements | 0 | The Quatrac stopped 6% shorter in the wet (6 tests) | 21 |
| Snow14 measurements | 8 | The Solus 4S HA32+ stopped 2.7% shorter on snow (4 tests) | 6 |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort7 measurements | 1 | 6 | |
| Value14 measurements | 5 | The Quatrac had 6.8% lower rolling resistance (3 tests) | 9 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.3/10 | The Quatrac by 1.2 | 9.5/10 |
| Owner rating6 and 30 reviews | 67% | The Quatrac by 14 points | 81% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 67% | The Quatrac by 19 points | 86% |
| Pricein the 3 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Quatrac was dearer in 3 of 3 | +16.2% |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 6 tests, 2022 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Solus 4S HA32+ | Field | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test | P13 of 15 | P1 of 15 | |
| 2024 All Season Tire Market Overview | P15 of 37 | P5 of 37 | |
| 2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test | P5 of 16 | P6 of 16 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P10 of 16 | P4 of 16 | |
| 2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout | P15 of 35 | P4 of 35 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P5 of 15 | P2 of 15 |
Performance profile
16 measurements from the 6 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Solus 4S HA32+
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Solus 4S HA32+
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Solus 4S HA32+
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Solus 4S HA32+ 67% from 6 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Solus 4S HA32+ | Gap | Quatrac | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 140 | 4.4% | 134 | 0-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 57.1 | 0.2% | 57.2 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 165 | 6% | 155 | 0-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 133 | 1.5% | 131 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 45.4 | 3.1% | 46.8 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.97 | 2% | 11.73 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 45.5 | 7.4% | 48.8 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.6 | 24.2% | 10.7 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70 | 2.7% | 71 | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 445 | 1.6% | 440 | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34.3 | 0.3% | 34.4 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.7 | 3.4% | 13.1 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 64 | 3.9% | 67 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.2 | 0.2 dB | 71.98 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5,893 | 4.6% | 5,780 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30,684 | 1.8% | 29,908 | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.69 | 6.8% | 8.08 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.4 | 0.8% | 5.36 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19.6 | 11.2% | 17.4 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69 | 13% | 60 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,116 | 40.1% | 669 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Solus 4S HA32+ scores 8.3 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
| Solus 4S HA32+ | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46 | Dry | 79 | ||
| 56 | Wet | 96 | ||
| 32 | Comfort | 59 | ||
| 41 | Value | 55 | ||
| 74 | Snow | 66 | ||
| 69 | Ice | 93 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Solus 4S HA32+ | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | Dry Grip | 8.2 | ||
| 7 | Wet Grip | 8.6 | ||
| 6.2 | Road Feedback | 7.2 | ||
| 5.7 | Handling | 8.1 | ||
| 8 | Wear | 8.7 | ||
| 7 | Comfort | 7.9 | ||
| 8.7 | Snow Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 8 | Ice Grip | 7.2 | ||
Owners rate the Solus 4S HA32+ 67% from 6 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
- 67%from 6 reviews
- 67%would buy again
- 73,500 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers generally describe the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus as a good-value all-season tire aimed at relaxed, family-car driving, with strong confidence in cold/wet conditions and good resistance to aquaplaning. Comfort is often rated well, with predictable behavior when pushed moderately. The most consistent drawbacks are a less sporty/less communicative feel and some reports of instability or “float/drift,” plus a small fuel-economy penalty and occasional noise. One low-scoring outlier found the tire extremely unstable and unsafe in the wet and at motorway speeds.
- Good wet/cold grip and overall safety for calm driving
- Strong aquaplaning resistance
- Good value versus premium alternatives and far better than budget/Chinese brands
- Comfortable ride and predictable handling at normal speeds
- Not suited to fast/sporty or powerful-car driving; muted steering/braking feel
- Some reports of unsteady/floaty behavior (drift/fidgety feel)
- Higher rolling resistance leading to slightly worse fuel economy
Summarised by AI from 6 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 6 Solus 4S HA32+ reviewsBetter than Chinese brands but not even close to premium brands. Only for calm drive
Vredestein Quatrac
- 81%from 30 reviews
- 86%would buy again
- 345,646 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Vredestein Quatrac is a strong all-season tire, most often praised for excellent wet-road grip and confident performance in cold conditions, including light-to-moderate snow and ice. Many reviewers highlight strong longevity (often projecting 60-80k km) along with good comfort and generally low noise, making it a solid value alternative to pricier rivals. A minority note higher cabin noise on certain vehicles and slightly less sharp/softer dry handling (especially in hotter temperatures) compared with more summer-focused tires.
- Excellent wet grip and confident wet braking
- Strong cold-weather performance (snow/ice capable for an all-season)
- Good longevity/treadwear and even wear reported by many
- Comfortable ride quality
- Can be noisier for some vehicles/sizes (noted by a minority)
- Dry handling/steering feel not as sporty or can feel softer in heat versus summer-oriented tires
Summarised by AI from 28 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 30 Quatrac reviewsFinally retired these at 55k miles. They were real good over all. Average: price and comfort. Above average: off road, snow and ice grip. Way above average: wet and dry grip. The wear was good too, if my alignment didn't go out I could've gotten about 62k out of these.
These tires went through hell and back. I took my car off road several times with these, they went through several snow storms including a couple blizzards. They never once let me down. I once got mired about 4" deep in muddy sand and was able to get out (fwd civic).
I ended up buying a new set of these. Very satisfied overall, I doubt there's another tire that has such good performance across the board without being costly. My new set was around mid $700s in total including mount, balance and disposal.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
| Category | Solus 4S HA32+ | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| On the market since | - | 2020 |
| Replaced | - | Vredestein Quatrac 5 (2014) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Quatrac was the dearer tire in 3 of the 3 tests that listed prices, by 16.2% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head puts two popular premium-touring all-season tires under the microscope: Kumho's Solus 4S HA32 Plus and Vredestein's Quatrac. Across six shared tests from 2022-2024, the Quatrac consistently ranks higher overall, including a decisive win in AutoBild 2024 (1/17 vs. 13/17), while the Kumho posts a few isolated strengths.
Patterns are clear: Vredestein dominates on wet and dry roads with shorter braking, better aquaplaning resistance, and sharper handling. Kumho counters with solid winter aptitude-especially on snow and ice-and, in several tests, a stronger value proposition. The result is a contrast between year-round safety and precision (Quatrac) versus budget-friendly winter assurance (HA32+).
Conclusion
If your priority is confidence in changeable UK/EU weather-frequent rain, standing water, and mixed temperatures-the Vredestein Quatrac is the safer, more rounded choice. It repeatedly stops shorter in the wet (often by 4-9%), resists aquaplaning far better (up to ~27-34% advantage in curved aqua), and brings composed, precise handling. It also posted excellent tread life and economy in AutoBild 2024, reinforcing long-term value despite a generally higher purchase price.
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus suits drivers who face regular winter episodes and want a lower upfront price: it often edges snow/ice braking and traction, and can deliver good mileage/value in some test sizes. However, its weaker aquaplaning reserves and longer wet/dry stops make it a compromise in rainy seasons. In short: choose Quatrac for all-weather security and handling polish; pick HA32+ if snow/ice traction and initial cost matter most.
Solus 4S HA32+ vs Quatrac: your questions
Is the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ or the Vredestein Quatrac the better tire?
In the 6 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 5 times and the Solus 4S HA32+ once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Solus 4S HA32+ scores 8.3 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Solus 4S HA32+ or the Quatrac?
The Quatrac led 21 of the 21 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6% shorter in the wet across 6 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Quatrac led 8 of the 9 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.4% shorter in the dry across 6 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Solus 4S HA32+ led 8 of the 14 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.7% shorter on snow across 4 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Solus 4S HA32+ lasted 1.8% longer in the wear tests (4 tests); the Quatrac had 6.8% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 8/10 for the Solus 4S HA32+ and 8.7/10 for the Quatrac.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7/10 for the Solus 4S HA32+ and 7.9/10 for the Quatrac.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Solus 4S HA32+ 67% from 6 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. 67% of Solus 4S HA32+ owners would buy it again, against 86% for the Quatrac.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Quatrac was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 16.2% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
3-12 in 16 shared tests
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-6 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Vredestein Quatrac
6-5 in 11 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion