Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 80% · 173
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 30
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 finished ahead 7 times and the Quatrac 3 times. The CrossClimate 2 stopped 5.3% shorter in the dry; the Quatrac stopped 1.5% shorter in the wet.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Michelin CrossClimate 2 if you face real winter conditions (regular snow/ice), want the shortest dry stops, and care about efficiency/low abrasion over time. Choose the Vredestein Quatrac if your priority is confident wet-road handling and strong performance-per-price in a milder, rain-heavy climate where snow is occasional rather than routine.
Where the CrossClimate 2 is stronger
- Consistently class-leading dry braking (won 10/10 shared tests; typically ~4-6% shorter, e.g., 39.6 m vs 42.0 m in ADAC 2026)
- Stronger winter package: snow braking/traction dominance (7/7 wins in both), with better snow handling and slalom speed in most tests
- Efficiency-focused engineering: usually lower rolling resistance (e.g., 7.4 vs 8.1 kg/t in Auto Bild 2024) and lower fuel use in several tests
Where the Quatrac is stronger
- Wet-road performance advantage overall: more wet braking wins (7/10) and a clean sweep in wet handling results reported (5/5 wins)
- Frequently stronger aquaplaning margins, especially in curved aquaplaning (e.g., 3.24 vs 2.95 m/s² in Auto Bild 2024)
- Strong overall value positioning versus the Michelin in multiple tests (lower price and better value scores, e.g., Tire Reviews 2023 price 63.65 vs 76.88)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
CrossClimate 2 vs Quatrac at a glance
| Category | CrossClimate 2 | Gap | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won10 shared tests | 7 | 3 | |
| Dry16 measurements | 15 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 5.3% shorter in the dry (10 tests) | 0 |
| Wet35 measurements | 8 | The Quatrac stopped 1.5% shorter in the wet (10 tests) | 26 |
| Snow24 measurements | 24 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 3.9% shorter on snow (7 tests) | 0 |
| Ice2 measurements | 2 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 2.6% shorter on ice (2 tests) | 0 |
| Comfort11 measurements | 6 | 3 | |
| Value19 measurements | 14 | The CrossClimate 2 had 7.1% lower rolling resistance (5 tests) | 4 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | Level | 9.5/10 |
| Owner rating173 and 30 reviews | 80% | Too close to call | 81% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 73% | The Quatrac by 13 points | 86% |
| Pricein the 5 tests that listed prices | +26.1% | The CrossClimate 2 was dearer in 5 of 5 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 116 | 27 sizes made in both | 39 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 10 tests, 2021 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | CrossClimate 2 | Field | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC All Season Tire Test - 185/65 R15 | P2 of 16 | P4 of 16 | |
| 2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test | P3 of 15 | P1 of 15 | |
| 2024 All Season Tire Market Overview | P4 of 37 | P5 of 37 | |
| 2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test | P4 of 16 | P6 of 16 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P1 of 16 | P4 of 16 | |
| 2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout | P2 of 35 | P4 of 35 | |
| 2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test | P1 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P9 of 15 | P2 of 15 | |
| 2022 All Season Tire Market Overview | P3 of 35 | P2 of 35 | |
| 2021 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test | P1 of 9 | P4 of 9 |
Performance profile
24 measurements from the 10 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
CrossClimate 2
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
CrossClimate 2
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
CrossClimate 2
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | CrossClimate 2 | Gap | Quatrac | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 126 | 5.3% | 134 | 10-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 60.95 | 0.1% | 61.04 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 57.4 | 0.2% | 57.2 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 142 | 1.5% | 139 | 3-7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 102 | 1.8% | 100 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 135 | 1.3% | 133 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 55.52 | 3.1% | 53.84 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 44.8 | 4.3% | 46.8 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 3.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.09 | 3% | 11.73 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 52.1 | 1.5% | 51.3 | 3-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56.3 | 2.8% | 54.8 | 2-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 62 | 3.9% | 64 | 7-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.51 | 6.6% | 5.9 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 483 | 5.1% | 459 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 86.76 | 2.8% | 89.32 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35.3 | 2.6% | 34.4 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.3% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28.98 | 1.8% | 29.52 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.4 | 9.3% | 13.1 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 68 | 2.6% | 70 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 3.3% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.38 | 0.4 dB | 71.75 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5,868 | 0.5% | 5,780 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31,213 | 6.3% | 29,344 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.54 | 7.1% | 8.11 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.35 | 1.2% | 5.41 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.3 | 17.8% | 17.4 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50 | 16.7% | 60 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 527 | 21.2% | 669 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the CrossClimate 2 scores 9.5 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
| CrossClimate 2 | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | Dry | 79 | ||
| 75 | Wet | 96 | ||
| 82 | Comfort | 59 | ||
| 84 | Value | 55 | ||
| 94 | Snow | 66 | ||
| 47 | Ice | 93 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| CrossClimate 2 | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | Dry Grip | 8.2 | ||
| 7.9 | Wet Grip | 8.6 | ||
| 7.6 | Road Feedback | 7.2 | ||
| 7.5 | Handling | 8.1 | ||
| 8.4 | Wear | 8.7 | ||
| 8.3 | Comfort | 7.9 | ||
| 8.4 | Snow Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 7.5 | Ice Grip | 7.2 | ||
Owners rate the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Michelin CrossClimate 2
- 80%from 173 reviews
- 73%would buy again
- 2,411,545 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners generally rate the Michelin CrossClimate 2 highly, most often praising its dependable all-weather grip with standout snow traction and strong dry and wet grip for an all-season tire. Comfort is commonly reported as very good and a sizeable minority also find it quiet, though road noise is a recurring talking point with roughly one in eight owners complaining it can hum or rumble. The main consistent drawback is efficiency: around one in seven owners report noticeably worse fuel economy/EV range (rolling resistance). A smaller but meaningful group also criticise wet handling confidence, particularly when pushed, even though straight-line wet grip and aquaplaning resistance tend to be viewed positively.
- Excellent snow traction and winter security
- Strong dry grip and traction
- Confident wet grip in everyday driving
- Good ride comfort over longer distances
- Noticeable hit to fuel economy/EV range (higher rolling resistance)
- Wet handling can feel nervous or lack confidence when cornering/braking
- Can be louder than expected on certain surfaces or at speed
Summarised by AI from 153 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 173 CrossClimate 2 reviewsAfter 2 hot summers the tires are dangerous on wet and cold,
That was actually very much appreciated since i drive them on a GR Yaris mostly on the weekends in the night on snowfall but normal use would be very very dangerous.
Vredestein Quatrac
- 81%from 30 reviews
- 86%would buy again
- 345,646 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Vredestein Quatrac is a strong all-season tire, most often praised for excellent wet-road grip and confident performance in cold conditions, including light-to-moderate snow and ice. Many reviewers highlight strong longevity (often projecting 60-80k km) along with good comfort and generally low noise, making it a solid value alternative to pricier rivals. A minority note higher cabin noise on certain vehicles and slightly less sharp/softer dry handling (especially in hotter temperatures) compared with more summer-focused tires.
- Excellent wet grip and confident wet braking
- Strong cold-weather performance (snow/ice capable for an all-season)
- Good longevity/treadwear and even wear reported by many
- Comfortable ride quality
- Can be noisier for some vehicles/sizes (noted by a minority)
- Dry handling/steering feel not as sporty or can feel softer in heat versus summer-oriented tires
Summarised by AI from 28 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 30 Quatrac reviewsFinally retired these at 55k miles. They were real good over all. Average: price and comfort. Above average: off road, snow and ice grip. Way above average: wet and dry grip. The wear was good too, if my alignment didn't go out I could've gotten about 62k out of these.
These tires went through hell and back. I took my car off road several times with these, they went through several snow storms including a couple blizzards. They never once let me down. I once got mired about 4" deep in muddy sand and was able to get out (fwd civic).
I ended up buying a new set of these. Very satisfied overall, I doubt there's another tire that has such good performance across the board without being costly. My new set was around mid $700s in total including mount, balance and disposal.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 116 sizes of the CrossClimate 2 and 39 of the Quatrac, 27 of them made in both.
| Category | CrossClimate 2 | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 116 sizes, 15 to 22 inch | 39 sizes, 15 to 18 inch |
| Made in both | 27 sizes 175/65 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15195/55 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15205/60 R15185/50 R16185/55 R16195/45 R16195/50 R16195/55 R16and 15 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B81%C19% | B100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C55%B33%D11%A1% | C69%D19%B8%A2%E2% |
| EU label noise | 69-73 dB B78%A22% | 70-72 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 176 of 176 | 106 of 106 |
| On the market since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaced | Michelin CrossClimate+ (2017) | Vredestein Quatrac 5 (2014) |
| Replaced by | Michelin CrossClimate 3 | - |
| Awards | Winner: Best All-Season Tires (DriverReviews, 2024/25) Winner: All-Season SUV Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2024) Winner: All-Season Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2023) Winner: All-Season SUV Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2022) Winner: All-Season Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2022) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The CrossClimate 2 was the dearer tire in 5 of the 5 tests that listed prices, by 26.1% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Michelin's CrossClimate 2 and Vredestein's Quatrac sit in the same “premium-touring all-season” space, but they get there with noticeably different priorities. Across 10 shared professional tests (ADAC, Auto Bild and Tire Reviews, spanning 15" to 17" fitments), the pattern is consistent: the Michelin behaves more like a summer tire that's been made genuinely winter-capable, while the Vredestein leans toward confident wet-road performance and everyday value.
That split shows up clearly in the scorecards. The CrossClimate 2 sweeps dry braking (10/10 wins) and dominates snow categories (snow braking and traction both 7/7 wins), but repeatedly gives away points in wet handling and wet braking. The Quatrac, on the other hand, is the more “rain-first” option (7/10 wet braking wins and 5/5 wet handling wins in the shared dataset), and in some tests it converts that into top overall placements-most notably Auto Bild 2024 where it finished 1st of 17 ahead of the Michelin in 3rd.
Conclusion
If you want the most convincing year-round safety envelope when winter actually matters, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is the more dependable all-rounder. It is consistently shorter in dry braking by meaningful margins (typically ~4-6%: e.g., 39.6 m vs 42.0 m in ADAC 2026; 37.7 m vs 40.3 m in Auto Bild 2023), and it repeatedly leads on snow traction and control (e.g., 2698 N vs 2605 N snow traction in Auto Bild 2024, plus faster snow slalom/handling results across multiple tests). It also tends to be the “low-running-cost” engineering benchmark on efficiency metrics: lower rolling resistance (e.g., 7.4 vs 8.1 kg/t in Auto Bild 2024) and often lower abrasion (e.g., 527 g vs 669 g wear loss in Auto Bild 2024). Where it loses ground is wet-road dynamics-especially wet handling-where several reports describe earlier under/oversteer and mid-pack grip, which can matter most for drivers in rainy climates.
The Vredestein Quatrac makes the strongest case for drivers who prioritize wet confidence and purchase value over maximum snow performance. It is frequently ahead on wet braking/handling (Auto Bild 2024 wet handling 75.2 km/h vs 71.9; Auto Bild 2023 wet braking 45.4 m vs 47.0), and its aquaplaning “reserves” are often better (e.g., curved aquaplaning 3.24 vs 2.95 m/s² in Auto Bild 2024). The trade-off is that it's usually less crisp on dry steering/precision (noted by ADAC) and is clearly the weaker choice when winter roads become regular rather than occasional. Practical takeaway: CrossClimate 2 is the safer bet for mixed climates with real winter and for drivers who value strong dry braking plus winter traction; Quatrac is the smarter pick for wet-focused regions and buyers chasing strong performance per euro-so long as snow is only an occasional challenge.
CrossClimate 2 vs Quatrac: your questions
Is the Michelin CrossClimate 2 or the Vredestein Quatrac the better tire?
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 finished ahead 7 times and the Quatrac 3 times. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the CrossClimate 2 scores 9.5 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the CrossClimate 2 or the Quatrac?
The Quatrac led 26 of the 35 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.5% shorter in the wet across 10 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The CrossClimate 2 led 15 of the 16 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.3% shorter in the dry across 10 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The CrossClimate 2 led 24 of the 24 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.9% shorter on snow across 7 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The CrossClimate 2 had 7.1% lower rolling resistance (5 tests), used 1.2% less fuel (5 tests) and shed 16.7% less rubber in the abrasion test (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8.4/10 for the CrossClimate 2 and 8.7/10 for the Quatrac.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the CrossClimate 2 and 7.9/10 for the Quatrac.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. 73% of CrossClimate 2 owners would buy it again, against 86% for the Quatrac.
Which is more expensive?
In the 5 tests that listed prices, the CrossClimate 2 was the dearer tire in 5 of them, by 26.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The CrossClimate 2 is made in 116 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the Quatrac in 39 (15 to 18 inch). 27 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the CrossClimate 2 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-4 in 13 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
7-19 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
3-9 in 12 shared tests
vs
Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-5 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-9 in 10 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
6-9 in 16 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion