Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 80% · 179
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 31
In the 11 independent tests that ran both tires, the CrossClimate 2 finished ahead 8 times and the Quatrac 3 times. The CrossClimate 2 stopped 5.3% shorter in the dry; the Quatrac stopped 1.4% shorter in the wet.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Michelin CrossClimate 2 if you face real winter conditions (regular snow/ice), want the shortest dry stops, and care about efficiency/low abrasion over time. Choose the Vredestein Quatrac if your priority is confident wet-road handling and strong performance-per-price in a milder, rain-heavy climate where snow is occasional rather than routine.
Where the CrossClimate 2 is stronger
- Consistently class-leading dry braking (won 10/10 shared tests; typically ~4-6% shorter, e.g., 39.6 m vs 42.0 m in ADAC 2026)
- Stronger winter package: snow braking/traction dominance (7/7 wins in both), with better snow handling and slalom speed in most tests
- Efficiency-focused engineering: usually lower rolling resistance (e.g., 7.4 vs 8.1 kg/t in Auto Bild 2024) and lower fuel use in several tests
Where the Quatrac is stronger
- Wet-road performance advantage overall: more wet braking wins (7/10) and a clean sweep in wet handling results reported (5/5 wins)
- Frequently stronger aquaplaning margins, especially in curved aquaplaning (e.g., 3.24 vs 2.95 m/s² in Auto Bild 2024)
- Strong overall value positioning versus the Michelin in multiple tests (lower price and better value scores, e.g., Tire Reviews 2023 price 63.65 vs 76.88)
Conclusion
If you want the most convincing year-round safety envelope when winter actually matters, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is the more dependable all-rounder. It is consistently shorter in dry braking by meaningful margins (typically ~4-6%: e.g., 39.6 m vs 42.0 m in ADAC 2026; 37.7 m vs 40.3 m in Auto Bild 2023), and it repeatedly leads on snow traction and control (e.g., 2698 N vs 2605 N snow traction in Auto Bild 2024, plus faster snow slalom/handling results across multiple tests). It also tends to be the “low-running-cost” engineering benchmark on efficiency metrics: lower rolling resistance (e.g., 7.4 vs 8.1 kg/t in Auto Bild 2024) and often lower abrasion (e.g., 527 g vs 669 g wear loss in Auto Bild 2024). Where it loses ground is wet-road dynamics-especially wet handling-where several reports describe earlier under/oversteer and mid-pack grip, which can matter most for drivers in rainy climates.
The Vredestein Quatrac makes the strongest case for drivers who prioritize wet confidence and purchase value over maximum snow performance. It is frequently ahead on wet braking/handling (Auto Bild 2024 wet handling 75.2 km/h vs 71.9; Auto Bild 2023 wet braking 45.4 m vs 47.0), and its aquaplaning “reserves” are often better (e.g., curved aquaplaning 3.24 vs 2.95 m/s² in Auto Bild 2024). The trade-off is that it's usually less crisp on dry steering/precision (noted by ADAC) and is clearly the weaker choice when winter roads become regular rather than occasional. Practical takeaway: CrossClimate 2 is the safer bet for mixed climates with real winter and for drivers who value strong dry braking plus winter traction; Quatrac is the smarter pick for wet-focused regions and buyers chasing strong performance per euro-so long as snow is only an occasional challenge.
Where to buy
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Vredestein QuatracAffiliate links: we may earn a commission if you buy. It never changes our results.
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
CrossClimate 2 vs Quatrac at a glance
| Category | CrossClimate 2 | Gap | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won11 shared tests | 8 | 3 | |
| Dry18 measurements | 17 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 5.3% shorter in the dry (11 tests) | 0 |
| Wet39 measurements | 10 | The Quatrac stopped 1.4% shorter in the wet (11 tests) | 28 |
| Snow27 measurements | 27 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 4.2% shorter on snow (8 tests) | 0 |
| Ice2 measurements | 2 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 2.6% shorter on ice (2 tests) | 0 |
| Comfort13 measurements | 6 | 5 | |
| Value16 measurements | 11 | The CrossClimate 2 had 6.5% lower rolling resistance (6 tests) | 4 |
| Environment4 measurements | 4 | The CrossClimate 2 shed 16.7% less rubber in the abrasion test (2 tests) | 0 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | Level | 9.5/10 |
| Owner rating179 and 31 reviews | 80% | Too close to call | 81% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 74% | The Quatrac by 13 points | 87% |
| Pricein the 6 tests that listed prices | +24.8% | The CrossClimate 2 was dearer in 6 of 6 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 116 | 27 sizes made in both | 39 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 11 tests, 2021 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | CrossClimate 2 | Field | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC All Season Tire Test - 185/65 R15 | P2 of 16 | P4 of 16 | |
| 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tire Test - 195/55 R16 | P2 of 8 | P4 of 8 | |
| 2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test | P3 of 15 | P1 of 15 | |
| 2024 All Season Tire Market Overview | P4 of 37 | P5 of 37 | |
| 2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test | P4 of 16 | P6 of 16 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P1 of 16 | P4 of 16 | |
| 2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout | P2 of 35 | P4 of 35 | |
| 2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test | P1 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P9 of 15 | P2 of 15 | |
| 2022 All Season Tire Market Overview | P3 of 35 | P2 of 35 | |
| 2021 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test | P1 of 9 | P4 of 9 |
Performance profile
32 measurements from the 11 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
CrossClimate 2
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
CrossClimate 2
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
CrossClimate 2
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the CrossClimate 2 80% from 179 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 31. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | CrossClimate 2 | Gap | Quatrac | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 127 | 5.3% | 134 | 11-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 60.95 | 0.1% | 61.04 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 57.4 | 0.2% | 57.2 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 4.7% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 140 | 1.4% | 138 | 3-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 102 | 1.8% | 100 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 135 | 1.3% | 133 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 55.52 | 3.1% | 53.84 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 44.8 | 4.3% | 46.8 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 8.1% | scored | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.09 | 3% | 11.73 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 51.6 | 1.4% | 50.9 | 4-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 76.2 | 1.8% | 73.8 | 3-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 65 | 4.2% | 67 | 8-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.51 | 6.6% | 5.9 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 488 | 5.4% | 461 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 86.76 | 2.8% | 89.32 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35.3 | 2.6% | 34.4 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.4% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28.98 | 1.8% | 29.52 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.4 | 9.3% | 13.1 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 68 | 2.6% | 70 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 0.9% | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 3.9% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.38 | 0.4 dB | 71.75 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5,868 | 0.5% | 5,780 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31,213 | 6.3% | 29,344 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.48 | 6.5% | 8.01 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.35 | 1.2% | 5.41 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50 | 16.7% | 60 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 527 | 21.2% | 669 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.3 | 17.8% | 17.4 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the CrossClimate 2 scores 9.5 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
| CrossClimate 2 | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | Dry | 79 | ||
| 74 | Wet | 96 | ||
| 82 | Comfort | 65 | ||
| 81 | Value | 54 | ||
| 98 | Environment | 61 | ||
| 94 | Snow | 65 | ||
| 44 | Ice | 92 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| CrossClimate 2 | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | Dry Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 8 | Wet Grip | 8.6 | ||
| 7.6 | Road Feedback | 7.3 | ||
| 7.5 | Handling | 8.1 | ||
| 8.4 | Wear | 8.7 | ||
| 8.3 | Comfort | 7.9 | ||
| 8.5 | Snow Grip | 8.4 | ||
| 7.4 | Ice Grip | 7.1 | ||
Owners rate the CrossClimate 2 80% from 179 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 31. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Michelin CrossClimate 2
- 80%from 179 reviews
- 74%would buy again
- 2,569,545 milesdriven by reviewers
Around three quarters of reviews are positive, with owners particularly praising the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for snow traction and dry grip. Wet grip also earns praise, although 16 owners criticise it and 12 report poor wet handling. Ride comfort is generally well regarded, and many longer-term owners report good tread life, though 12 owners find wear disappointing. Road noise divides opinion: 40 owners describe it as quiet, while 21 find it noisy. A smaller group of 12 owners report increased fuel consumption.
- Strong traction on snow
- Good dry grip
- Good wet grip for many owners
- Low road noise for many owners
- Disappointing wet handling
- Increased fuel consumption
Summarised by AI from 159 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 179 CrossClimate 2 reviewsI have run these tires for over two years and they still have over 6mm of tread. I am very happy with their performance, throughout that time, in all types of weather and on various different surfaces. They excel in wet weather, clearing water and giving good feedback. They inspire confidence at all times and have never failed to competently manage the weight and power of my T8 PHEV. The ride quality is very good and the road noise is not intrusive. I have enjoyed running them and have no hesitation in recommending them. I shall explore the CrossClimate 3 when they need replacing.
Vredestein Quatrac
- 81%from 31 reviews
- 87%would buy again
- 365,646 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners are largely positive about the Vredestein Quatrac, particularly its traction on snow and grip in the wet. Dry grip and handling also earn praise, as does wet handling, although a few drivers find dry handling less assured. Several longer-term owners report good tread life, with some covering more than 35,000 miles and still having useful tread remaining. Road noise divides opinion: around one in six reviews criticise it, while a similar number find it quiet. Just over half the reviews were written when the tire was new, so the overall picture leans towards early impressions.
- Strong traction on snow
- Good grip in the wet
- Assured dry handling
- Good dry grip
- Road noise for some drivers
Summarised by AI from 30 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 31 Quatrac reviewsI have these tires for almost 5 years now and they've had to endure a lot this past summer with 40+ degree heat and spirited driving.
The tires were excellent on snow and ice, wet handling was also very good. In the dry the tires were also very communicative and indicate the levels of grip well.
Now that the tires are down to 4mm I noticed that the rolling resistance is slightly higher. When coasting down the same hill as before it feels like there's more resitance, as if the brakes are applied ever so slightly.
Because I'm using the tires for almost 5 years, they have become a bit harder and because of my spirited driving and many corners around where I live, the outer edges of the tread have worn down to around 1mm causing the wet grip to suffer. I'll be having the tires replaced because of it, but if it were spring I would probably keep the tires on for a little bit longer.
Overall I really liked these tires and will definitely choose them again in case I would need all season tires again.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 116 sizes of the CrossClimate 2 and 39 of the Quatrac, 27 of them made in both.
| Category | CrossClimate 2 | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 116 sizes, 15 to 22 inch | 39 sizes, 15 to 18 inch |
| Made in both | 27 sizes 175/65 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15195/55 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15205/60 R15185/50 R16185/55 R16195/45 R16195/50 R16195/55 R16and 15 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B81%C19% | B100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C55%B33%D11%A1% | C69%D19%B8%A2%E2% |
| EU label noise | 69-73 dB B78%A22% | 70-72 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 176 of 176 | 106 of 106 |
| On the market since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaced | Michelin CrossClimate+ (2017) | Vredestein Quatrac 5 (2014) |
| Replaced by | Michelin CrossClimate 3 | - |
| Awards |
Tire Reviews awards
Highly Recommended The Best All Season Tires for 2024 / 2025
Highly Recommended The Best All Season Tires for 2024
Test Winner 2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test
Test Winner 2022/23 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test
Test Winner 2021 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test
Rated by other publications
Recommended 2
|
Tire Reviews awards
Recommended The BEST All Season Tires For 2026/27
Recommended 2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test
Recommended 2021 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test
Rated by other publications
Test Winner 1
Highly Recommended 1
Value Pick 1
Recommended 1
|
| Price in the shared tests | The CrossClimate 2 was the dearer tire in 6 of the 6 tests that listed prices, by 24.8% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Prices by size
Lowest price per tire at our partner shops, including delivery, in the sizes both are made in.
| Size | CrossClimate 2 | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| 175/65 R15 | ||
| 185/60 R15 | ||
| 185/65 R15 | ||
| 195/55 R15 | ||
| 195/60 R15 | ||
| 195/65 R15 | ||
| 205/60 R15 | ||
| 185/50 R16 | ||
| 185/55 R16 | ||
| 195/45 R16 | ||
| 195/50 R16 | ||
| 195/55 R16 |
Affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you buy. It never changes our results.
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Michelin's CrossClimate 2 and Vredestein's Quatrac sit in the same “premium-touring all-season” space, but they get there with noticeably different priorities. Across 10 shared professional tests (ADAC, Auto Bild and Tire Reviews, spanning 15" to 17" fitments), the pattern is consistent: the Michelin behaves more like a summer tire that's been made genuinely winter-capable, while the Vredestein leans toward confident wet-road performance and everyday value.
That split shows up clearly in the scorecards. The CrossClimate 2 sweeps dry braking (10/10 wins) and dominates snow categories (snow braking and traction both 7/7 wins), but repeatedly gives away points in wet handling and wet braking. The Quatrac, on the other hand, is the more “rain-first” option (7/10 wet braking wins and 5/5 wet handling wins in the shared dataset), and in some tests it converts that into top overall placements-most notably Auto Bild 2024 where it finished 1st of 17 ahead of the Michelin in 3rd.
CrossClimate 2 vs Quatrac: your questions
Is the Michelin CrossClimate 2 or the Vredestein Quatrac the better tire?
In the 11 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 finished ahead 8 times and the Quatrac 3 times. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the CrossClimate 2 scores 9.5 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the CrossClimate 2 or the Quatrac?
The Quatrac led 28 of the 39 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.4% shorter in the wet across 11 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The CrossClimate 2 led 17 of the 18 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.3% shorter in the dry across 11 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The CrossClimate 2 led 27 of the 27 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.2% shorter on snow across 8 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The CrossClimate 2 had 6.5% lower rolling resistance (6 tests) and used 1.2% less fuel (5 tests). Owners rate wear 8.4/10 for the CrossClimate 2 and 8.7/10 for the Quatrac.
Which sheds less rubber as it wears?
The CrossClimate 2 shed 16.7% less rubber in the abrasion test (2 tests). Abrasion tests measure the rubber a tire sheds as it wears.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the CrossClimate 2 and 7.9/10 for the Quatrac.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the CrossClimate 2 80% from 179 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 31. 74% of CrossClimate 2 owners would buy it again, against 87% for the Quatrac.
Which is more expensive?
In the 6 tests that listed prices, the CrossClimate 2 was the dearer tire in 6 of them, by 24.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The CrossClimate 2 is made in 116 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the Quatrac in 39 (15 to 18 inch). 27 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the CrossClimate 2 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-5 in 14 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
7-20 in 27 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
3-10 in 13 shared tests
vs
Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-6 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
6-10 in 17 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion