Continental AllSeasonContact vs Vredestein Quatrac
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 5 times and the AllSeasonContact once, with one level. The AllSeasonContact was stronger in snow, the Quatrac in dry and wet.
Performance profile
16 measurements from the 7 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
AllSeasonContact
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 11 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
AllSeasonContact
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
AllSeasonContact
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 82% from 44 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | AllSeasonContact | Gap | Quatrac | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Quatrac ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking - Cool ft | 130 | 2% | 128 | 0-1 |
| Dry Braking ft | 142 | 6.7% | 133 | 0-7 |
| Dry Handling - Cool s | 77.2 | 0.1% | 77.1 | 0-1 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 57.81 | 0.4% | 57.52 | 0-2 |
| Dry Handling (mph) | 58.5 | 1.3% | 59.2 | 0-3 |
| Wet Quatrac ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 156 | 2.3% | 153 | 2-5 |
| Wet Braking - Cool ft | 148 | 2.7% | 143 | 0-2 |
| Wet Handling - Cool s | 91.5 | 1.3% | 90.3 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 57.99 | 2% | 57.04 | 1-1 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 44.1 | 1.9% | 45 | 0-3 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.03 | = | 12.03 | 0-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 49.3 | 2.2% | 50.4 | 0-5 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 147.4 | 0.3% | 142.4 | 1-1 |
| Snow AllSeasonContact ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 84 | 3.4% | 86 | 5-0 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.85 | 0.5% | 5.88 | 1-0 |
| Snow Traction (lbf) | 614 | 3.6% | 593 | 3-0 |
| Snow Handling s | 59.8 | 1.7% | 61.37 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling (mph) | 29.8 | 2.6% | 29.1 | 3-0 |
| Snow Circle s | 29.41 | 0.4% | 29.52 | 1-0 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 14.8 | 9.2% | 13.5 | 1-0 |
| Comfort Level | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Noise dB | 70.76 | = | 70.78 | 2-3 |
| Tire Weight lb | 16,574 | 3.9% | 17,240 | 1-0 |
| Value Level | ||||
| Wear miles | 32,898 | 14.3% | 37,713 | 0-2 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.62 | 4.1% | 7.97 | 3-1 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.32 | 4.3% | 5.56 | 1-0 |
| Abrasion Gram/1000km | 21.4 | 18.7% | 17.4 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 7 tests, 2020 to 2022
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | AllSeasonContact | Field | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P13 of 15 | P2 of 15 | |
| 2022 All Season Tire Market Overview | P8 of 35 | P2 of 35 | |
| 2021 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test | P3 of 9 | P4 of 9 | |
| 2021 AZ All Season Tire Test | P1 of 9 | P1 of 9 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test | P7 of 11 | P1 of 11 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P3 of 14 | P2 of 14 | |
| 2020 All Season Tire Market Overview - 32 Tire Braking Test | P8 of 32 | P2 of 32 |
AllSeasonContact vs Quatrac: your questions
Is the Continental AllSeasonContact or the Vredestein Quatrac the better tire?
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 5 times and the AllSeasonContact once, with one level. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the AllSeasonContact scores 8.7 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the AllSeasonContact or the Quatrac?
The Quatrac led 18 of the 23 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.3% shorter in the wet across 7 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Quatrac led 14 of the 14 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6.7% shorter in the dry across 7 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The AllSeasonContact led 15 of the 16 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.4% shorter on snow across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The AllSeasonContact had 4.1% lower rolling resistance (5 tests); the Quatrac lasted 14.3% longer in the wear tests (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.6/10 for the AllSeasonContact and 8.7/10 for the Quatrac.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the AllSeasonContact and 7.9/10 for the Quatrac.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 82% from 44 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. 80% of AllSeasonContact owners would buy it again, against 86% for the Quatrac.
Which is more expensive?
In the 4 tests that listed prices, the AllSeasonContact was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 13.7% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The AllSeasonContact is made in 108 sizes (13 to 20 inch) and the Quatrac in 39 (15 to 18 inch). 29 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the AllSeasonContact is graded B for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac B and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The Quatrac is the newer design: it reached the market in 2020, the AllSeasonContact in 2017. The Quatrac replaced the Vredestein Quatrac 5.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
3-12 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-8 in 19 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.