Continental AllSeasonContact vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- TR Score
- 8.7/10
- Owners say
- 82% · 44
- TR Score
- 8.9/10
- Owners say
- 75% · 72
In the 19 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental AllSeasonContact finished ahead 11 times and the Kinergy 4S2 8 times. The AllSeasonContact lasted 24.6% longer in the wear tests; the Kinergy 4S2 stopped 4.1% shorter in the dry.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Continental AllSeasonContact for mixed climates with meaningful rain/snow, long trips and efficiency focus. Choose Hankook Kinergy 4S2 for milder climates and drivers prioritising short braking, agile feel and lower purchase price.
Where the AllSeasonContact is stronger
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance and wet security (notably strong straight aquaplaning results)
- Low rolling resistance and lower fuel consumption across tests
- Consistently competent on snow with balanced braking/handling
Where the Kinergy 4S2 is stronger
- Short dry and wet braking with confident handling feel
- Competitive wet performance including strong handling and often top aquaplaning in some tests
- Lower purchase price and good overall value
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
AllSeasonContact vs Kinergy 4S2 at a glance
| Category | AllSeasonContact | Gap | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won19 shared tests | 11 | 8 | |
| Dry27 measurements | 2 | The Kinergy 4S2 stopped 4.1% shorter in the dry (14 tests) | 24 |
| Wet44 measurements | 16 | The Kinergy 4S2 stopped 1.7% shorter in the wet (14 tests) | 28 |
| Snow30 measurements | 19 | The AllSeasonContact stopped 2.2% shorter on snow (10 tests) | 9 |
| Comfort13 measurements | 4 | The Kinergy 4S2 was 0.6 dB quieter (10 tests) | 7 |
| Value17 measurements | 16 | The AllSeasonContact lasted 24.6% longer in the wear tests (5 tests) | 1 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.7/10 | The Kinergy 4S2 by 0.2 | 8.9/10 |
| Owner rating44 and 72 reviews | 82% | The AllSeasonContact by 7 points | 75% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 80% | The AllSeasonContact by 6 points | 74% |
| Pricein the 10 tests that listed prices | +21.9% | The AllSeasonContact was dearer in 10 of 10 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 108 | 73 sizes made in both | 96 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 19 tests, 2018 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
Performance profile
18 measurements from the 19 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
AllSeasonContact
Kinergy 4S2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 12 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
AllSeasonContact
Kinergy 4S2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
AllSeasonContact
Kinergy 4S2
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 82% from 44 reviews and the Kinergy 4S2 75% from 72. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | AllSeasonContact | Gap | Kinergy 4S2 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 130 | 3.8% | 125 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 141 | 4.1% | 135 | 0-14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 77.2 | 0.3% | 77 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 83.36 | 0.2% | 83.49 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 58.4 | 0.9% | 59 | 0-7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 160 | 1.7% | 157 | 3-11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 196 | 6.1% | 209 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 91.5 | 3.1% | 94.4 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 78.27 | 0.2% | 78.03 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 45.1 | 0.3% | 45.2 | 3-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.6% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.82 | 0.3% | 13.86 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50 | = | 49.9 | 4-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.9 | 4.4% | 12.7 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 89 | 2.2% | 91 | 6-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.38 | 1.3% | 15.09 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 684 | 0.3% | 688 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 75.78 | 0.6% | 75.41 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32.1 | 1.3% | 31.7 | 5-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 7.1% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | 4.6% | 14.3 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 6.5% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.15 | 0.6 dB | 69.58 | 3-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 67.9 | 0.8 dB | 67.1 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16,574 | 7.7% | 17,966 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32,664 | 24.6% | 26,224 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.83 | 8.4% | 8.55 | 10-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.32 | 5.8% | 5.65 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21.4 | 8.5% | 23.4 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the AllSeasonContact scores 8.7 and the Kinergy 4S2 8.9 out of 10.
| AllSeasonContact | Category | Kinergy 4S2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | Dry | 80 | ||
| 87 | Wet | 85 | ||
| 28 | Comfort | 43 | ||
| 72 | Value | 42 | ||
| 76 | Snow | 74 | ||
| 40 | Ice | 25 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| AllSeasonContact | Category | Kinergy 4S2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.2 | Dry Grip | 8.1 | ||
| 8.6 | Wet Grip | 8 | ||
| 8.1 | Road Feedback | 7.1 | ||
| 8.3 | Handling | 7.4 | ||
| 7.6 | Wear | 7.6 | ||
| 8.3 | Comfort | 7.3 | ||
| 8.5 | Snow Grip | 7.5 | ||
| 7.8 | Ice Grip | 6.5 | ||
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 82% from 44 reviews and the Kinergy 4S2 75% from 72. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Continental AllSeasonContact
- 82%from 44 reviews
- 80%would buy again
- 757,711 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Continental AllSeasonContact well overall, with most highlighting strong wet grip and confident snow traction as its key strengths. A sizeable minority also note it is quieter than expected for an all-season tire, with decent comfort and dry grip for everyday driving. The main mixed area is tread life: many report long mileage, but around one in six owners feel wear can be disappointing in hotter conditions. A small number also report punctures, though this is far from a majority view.
- Strong wet grip and reassuring wet-road confidence
- Excellent traction on snow
- Low road noise for an all-season tire
- Good dry grip for normal road driving
- Tread life can be mediocre for some drivers
- Puncture resistance reported as poor by a small minority
- Dry braking feels inconsistent to some
Summarised by AI from 39 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 44 AllSeasonContact reviewsOverall very happy with the performance and the grip especially in wet and winter conditions. In the summer when temperatures are quite high, the tires seem to feel like a cheaper B-brand all season tire with mushy performance especially when cornering at higher speeds. Unfortunately I've had one puncture on the rear, which could have been due to bad road conditions in the south of France but I still find it quiet strange to have the tire so damaged after off-roading on little dusty roads, my GT Radial and Bridgestone's never had this issue. The tires seem to have very little wear after 21000 miles, I think they could easily last another 20000 but I'm probably going to replace them by Michelin's next year.
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- 75%from 72 reviews
- 74%would buy again
- 995,659 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners generally rate the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 as a strong all-weather all-rounder, with most praise focused on dependable wet and dry grip (mentioned by around half of reviewers) and reassuring snow traction. Longevity is often reported as good, and a notable minority also highlight the comfortable ride and strong value for money. The most consistent drawback is road noise, raised by over a third of owners, while a smaller group report higher fuel consumption/rolling resistance.
- Confident wet grip in cold and rain
- Strong dry grip for an all-season tire
- Good tread life for year-round use
- Surprisingly capable traction in snow
- Noticeable road noise or whining at certain speeds
- Higher rolling resistance or worse fuel economy
- Can feel less predictable at the limit (soft/squealy breakaway)
Summarised by AI from 65 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 72 Kinergy 4S2 reviewsExcellent tires for all seasons, this was my first test as I've always used summer/winter tires on all my cars for more safety and longevity. These tires perform very well on dry roads, in corners whether wet or not, but especially great on snow, whether it's recovery, acceleration, or grip (Summit of the Vosges for example or the Belgian Ardennes). I was very surprised despite all my extensive research on tires with a good price-quality ratio. After 46,000 km, I wouldn't try them again on snow as I've far exceeded the winter wear indicator, but there are still 2mm of tread left for summer.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 108 sizes of the AllSeasonContact and 96 of the Kinergy 4S2, 73 of them made in both.
| Category | AllSeasonContact | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 108 sizes, 13 to 20 inch | 96 sizes, 14 to 20 inch |
| Made in both | 73 sizes 155/65 R14165/65 R14165/70 R14175/65 R14175/70 R14185/60 R14185/65 R14185/70 R14165/65 R15175/55 R15175/65 R15185/55 R15and 61 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B98%C2% | B96%C4% |
| EU label rolling resistance | B59%C32%A8%D1%E1% | C78%D22%B1% |
| EU label noise | 70-73 dB B100% | 70-73 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 191 of 191 | 194 of 194 |
| On the market since | 2017 | - |
| Replaced | - | Hankook Kinergy 4S (2021) |
| Replaced by | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The AllSeasonContact was the dearer tire in 10 of the 10 tests that listed prices, by 21.9% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits two proven all-season touring tires against each other: Continental's AllSeasonContact and Hankook's Kinergy 4S2. Across 19 shared tests, both consistently score well, but they go about it differently. The Continental majors on efficiency, aquaplaning safety and snow confidence, while the Hankook leans into sharp braking and lively handling in the dry and wet at a lower price point.
Recent tests underscore this split. In 2024 (235/55 R17), Continental placed 4th with standout straight-line aquaplaning (+9% vs Hankook) and class-leading rolling resistance, while Hankook finished 8th but delivered shorter dry and wet stops, lower noise and a keener price. Earlier benchmarks repeatedly show Hankook braking shorter on dry and wet roads, whereas Continental often counters with better aquaplaning reserves, lower fuel use and stronger snow balance.
Conclusion
If you prioritize all-weather safety margins, efficiency and winter assurance, the Continental AllSeasonContact is the steadier pick: repeatedly low rolling resistance, strong aquaplaning resistance, and reliably good snow performance, with generally longer tread life. If you value crisp road manners and short stopping distances in everyday mild climates, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is the more engaging and cost-effective choice, frequently leading in dry/wet braking and often pricing 15-30% lower.
For predominantly urban/suburban driving with frequent rain and occasional snow, Continental's added aquaplaning headroom and efficiency pay off over time. For drivers who want maximum bite in emergency stops and a lower upfront cost, Hankook delivers excellent real-world value. The practical takeaway: choose Continental for year-round security and economy; choose Hankook for budget-savvy, grippy performance in milder winters.
AllSeasonContact vs Kinergy 4S2: your questions
Is the Continental AllSeasonContact or the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 the better tire?
In the 19 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental AllSeasonContact finished ahead 11 times and the Kinergy 4S2 8 times. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the AllSeasonContact scores 8.7 and the Kinergy 4S2 8.9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the AllSeasonContact or the Kinergy 4S2?
The Kinergy 4S2 led 28 of the 44 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.7% shorter in the wet across 14 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Kinergy 4S2 led 24 of the 27 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.1% shorter in the dry across 14 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The AllSeasonContact led 19 of the 30 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.2% shorter on snow across 10 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The AllSeasonContact lasted 24.6% longer in the wear tests (5 tests) and had 8.4% lower rolling resistance (10 tests). Owners rate wear 7.6/10 for the AllSeasonContact and 7.6/10 for the Kinergy 4S2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Kinergy 4S2 was 0.6 dB quieter (10 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the AllSeasonContact and 7.3/10 for the Kinergy 4S2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 82% from 44 reviews and the Kinergy 4S2 75% from 72. 80% of AllSeasonContact owners would buy it again, against 74% for the Kinergy 4S2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 10 tests that listed prices, the AllSeasonContact was the dearer tire in 10 of them, by 21.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The AllSeasonContact is made in 108 sizes (13 to 20 inch) and the Kinergy 4S2 in 96 (14 to 20 inch). 73 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the AllSeasonContact is graded B for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Kinergy 4S2 B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
5-1 in 6 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-1 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
6-9 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
3-12 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
15-10 in 25 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
5-11 in 16 shared tests
Every Continental vs Hankook test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion