Falken Azenis RS820 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Across EVO's 235/35 R19 test and Auto Bild Sports Cars' 295/30 R20 test, the Goodyear consistently ran at or near the front, while the Falken showed promise with strong efficiency and moments of dry stop-and-go strength. Expect a pronounced gap in wet safety and handling in favor of Goodyear, countered by Falken's notably lower rolling resistance and a credible dry braking showing in one test.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | three |
While it might look like the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport is better than the Falken Azenis RS820 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Lowest rolling resistance in both tests, aiding efficiency and range
- Competitive dry braking (won Auto Bild by ~2.9%) with strong traction out of slow corners
- Positive steering feel and predictable balance that's easy to place at the limit
- Good overall composure; enjoyable to drive, especially in consistent dry conditions
- Outstanding wet performance: ~17% shorter wet braking in EVO and stronger wet handling
- Sharp, connected steering with excellent balance and stability on road and circuit
- Consistently quicker in dry and wet handling; strong subjective road scores
- Better aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved) and slightly lower exterior noise
Dry Braking
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Falken Azenis RS820 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Falken Azenis RS820 stopped the vehicle in 0.89% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Dry Braking: Falken Azenis RS820
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 0.75% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 2.03% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 19.2% more points than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Road Score
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one subj. road score tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 8.57% more points than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Subj. Road Score: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Subj. Road Score winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport stopped the vehicle in 5.08% less distance than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 4.69% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 2.2% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two subj. wet handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 9.91% more points than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 0.09% faster around a wet circle than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport floated at a 1.67% higher speed than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport slipped out at a 8.24% higher speed than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 6.9% more points than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Falken Azenis RS820 was better during one noise tests. On average the Falken Azenis RS820 measured 0.14% quieter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Noise: Falken Azenis RS820
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Falken Azenis RS820 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Falken Azenis RS820 had a 6.43% lower rolling resistance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Falken Azenis RS820
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Falken Azenis RS820 and Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
In total the Falken Azenis RS820 has been reviewed 7 times and drivers have given the tire 90% overall.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport has been reviewed 61 times and drivers have given the tire 84% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Falken Azenis RS820.
Tires I already drove on my 322hp Megane RS: PS4, PS4s, PS3, Nokian Powerproof and now the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport in 235/40/18.
Dry grip and feedback is great! Full throttle out of the corner is easy (works great with some added negative camber). It gives you so much confidence. The feedback is superb and now I really can push the car to its limits. I think they behave the same as the PS4s but it is difficult to compare because I've changed the suspension this year.
These Goodyears are a... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Azenis RS820's counterpunch is efficiency and respectable dry security. It posted the best rolling resistance in both tests and even claimed the Auto Bild dry-braking win by ~3%. Testers liked its steering feel and composure, but it lagged in wet metrics and aquaplaning, and it was a touch louder. For drivers who value wet grip and ultimate handling precision, Goodyear is the safer, more exciting choice; for those prioritizing efficiency and solid dry-road performance, Falken makes a pragmatic case. The practical takeaway: choose Goodyear for all-weather confidence and pace, Falken for lower energy consumption and competent dry-road sportiness.
Key Differences
- Wet braking gap: Goodyear stopped ~17% shorter in EVO (27.79 m vs 33.63 m), reinforcing a clear wet-safety edge
- Aquaplaning resilience: Goodyear led straight and curved aquaplaning in both tests; Falken trailed, including last in curved aqua at Auto Bild
- Handling pace: Goodyear was quicker in dry and wet handling across both tests, with notably higher subjective scores
- Rolling resistance: Falken led both tests (e.g., 8.5 vs 9.3 kg/t at Auto Bild), implying better efficiency
- Noise/refinement: Goodyear measured slightly quieter (73.1 vs 73.7 dB at Auto Bild) and scored better subjectively on the road
- Dry braking variability: Goodyear edged EVO dry braking; Falken won Auto Bild dry braking, making straight-line dry stops essentially a wash
Overall Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Falken Azenis RS820 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.