Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 85% · 16
- TR Score
- 8.9/10
- Owners say
- 84% · 66
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo finished ahead 3 times and the Eagle F1 SuperSport not once. The Potenza Sport Evo stopped 11.1% shorter in the wet; the Eagle F1 SuperSport resisted straight aquaplaning at a 1% higher speed.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo if you want the quickest, safest all-round max-performance summer tire-especially for wet-road confidence and hard-braking performance. Consider the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport mainly if aquaplaning resistance and a more compliant, enjoyable road feel are your priorities and you can buy it at a clear price advantage in your exact size/fitment.
Where the Potenza Sport Evo is stronger
- Class-leading braking performance (shortest/near-shortest dry and wet braking across the shared tests)
- Strong wet handling and lateral grip (notably higher wet handling speeds and faster wet circle)
- Sporty, precise steering with predictable, neutral handling balance
Where the Eagle F1 SuperSport is stronger
- Best straight-line aquaplaning resistance in the shared data (wins both straight-aqua comparisons)
- Comfortable, confidence-inspiring road manners for a max-performance tire (noted by test driver impressions)
- Enjoyable driving feel and good warm-up characteristics (becoming quicker on lap two once up to temperature)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Potenza Sport Evo vs Eagle F1 SuperSport at a glance
| Category | Potenza Sport Evo | Gap | Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won3 shared tests | 3 | 0 | |
| Dry5 measurements | 5 | The Potenza Sport Evo stopped 3.9% shorter in the dry (2 tests) | 0 |
| Wet8 measurements | 5 | The Potenza Sport Evo stopped 11.1% shorter in the wet (2 tests) | 2 |
| Comfort4 measurements | 2 | Level between the two. | 2 |
| Value2 measurements | 2 | The Potenza Sport Evo had 9.7% lower rolling resistance (2 tests) | 0 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | The Potenza Sport Evo by 0.6 | 8.9/10 |
| Owner rating16 and 66 reviews | 85% | Too close to call | 84% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 86% | The Potenza Sport Evo by 5 points | 81% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 115 | 52 sizes made in both | 75 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Potenza Sport Evo | Field | Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|---|
| The BEST Performance Summer Tires for 2026 Tested! | P2 of 8 | P4 of 8 | |
| 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tire Test | P2 of 8 | P8 of 8 | |
| 2026 ACE Summer Tire Test | P3 of 10 | P8 of 10 |
Performance profile
6 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Potenza Sport Evo
Eagle F1 SuperSport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Potenza Sport Evo
Eagle F1 SuperSport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Potenza Sport Evo
Eagle F1 SuperSport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Potenza Sport Evo 85% from 16 reviews and the Eagle F1 SuperSport 84% from 66. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Potenza Sport Evo | Gap | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Wins | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111 | 3.9% | 115 | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 77.38 | 1.6% | 78.66 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 66.5 | 3.8% | 64.1 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 3% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 113 | 11.1% | 129 | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 102.6 | 0.1% | 102.7 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 46.7 | 18.3% | 39.5 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 12.5 | 16.1% | 14.9 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 51 | 1% | 51.5 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 7.8% | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 73.85 | 0.6 dB | 73.3 | 1-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 9.36 | 9.7% | 10.36 | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Potenza Sport Evo scores 9.5 and the Eagle F1 SuperSport 8.9 out of 10.
| Potenza Sport Evo | Category | Eagle F1 SuperSport | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98 | Dry | 94 | ||
| 97 | Wet | 83 | ||
| 11 | Comfort | 14 | ||
| 20 | Value | 4 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Potenza Sport Evo | Category | Eagle F1 SuperSport | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | Dry Grip | 9.5 | ||
| 8.6 | Wet Grip | 8.1 | ||
| 8.4 | Road Feedback | 9.1 | ||
| 9.2 | Handling | 9.1 | ||
| 7.8 | Wear | 7.2 | ||
| 7.7 | Comfort | 7.3 | ||
Owners rate the Potenza Sport Evo 85% from 16 reviews and the Eagle F1 SuperSport 84% from 66. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
- 85%from 16 reviews
- 86%would buy again
- 71,803 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo delivers outstanding dry grip and exceptionally strong wet traction, with very sharp turn-in and confident, stable handling that suits fast road use and even track days. Many also feel wear and track durability are improved versus the older Potenza Sport, and value-for-money is frequently praised against Michelin/Continental rivals. The main recurring drawback is higher road noise and a firmer, stiff-sidewall ride, which can reduce refinement on quieter cars.
- Excellent dry grip
- Very strong wet grip and confidence in rain/cold conditions
- Sharp steering response and quick turn-in
- Stable, predictable handling with strong braking/traction
- Noticeably higher road noise/roar
- Firm ride and stiff sidewalls (reduced comfort/refinement for some)
Summarised by AI from 13 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 16 Potenza Sport Evo reviewsBefore switching to the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo (in size 205/45/17), I had the Yokohama Advan Neova RS (in size 205/55/17). The difference is night and day—in favor of the Bridgestones. Their grip and user-friendliness are on an entirely different level; they are in a different league compared to the unacceptable Yokohama Advan Neova RS, whose only real advantage was minimal wear.
The Bridgestones seem much more prone to wear, but that’s a fair trade-off given their excellent performance—after all, you can’t have everything. I can’t comment on their performance in the rain, as I haven’t had the chance to drive in such conditions yet.
To wrap up, they are quiet and feature a very solid sidewall—though perhaps not quite as good as those found on older Bridgestone models.
I recommend them without hesitation!
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
- 84%from 66 reviews
- 81%would buy again
- 470,802 milesdriven by reviewers
Most owners agree the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport delivers outstanding dry grip and confidence, backed up by sharp steering response and strong dry handling, with many also praising its stability when driven hard. Wet grip is generally rated good for a UUHP tire, though around one in ten owners specifically criticise wet handling, and a similar share note it can struggle in colder conditions. Comfort is the main compromise: close to three in ten owners find it too firm or unsettled over bumps. Tread life is more mixed, with a meaningful minority reporting rapid wear (especially on higher-torque use) while others see impressive longevity for the category.
- Exceptional dry grip, even when driven hard
- Precise steering response and strong feedback
- Very capable dry handling and cornering confidence
- Good wet grip for a UUHP summer tire
- Firm, busy ride that can feel harsh over bumps
- Tread life is inconsistent, with some reporting fast wear
- Poor cold-weather grip; not a winter-friendly choice
Summarised by AI from 61 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 66 Eagle F1 SuperSport reviewsThe Goodyear SuperSport tires deliver immediate feedback and precise handling. The best part is how they completely changed the behavior of my S3 3‑door: it used to push from the nose, but with these tires the front end finally bites and the rear becomes playful.
The car is so much more fun to drive now.
They’re also almost indestructible, especially compared to Pirelli and Michelin (which have their own strengths, but durability isn’t one of them).
I really enjoyed these tires and would absolutely buy them again — unless Goodyear releases a new SuperSport.
Thanks, Goodyear. Great work.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 115 sizes of the Potenza Sport Evo and 75 of the Eagle F1 SuperSport, 52 of them made in both.
| Category | Potenza Sport Evo | Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 115 sizes, 16 to 22 inch | 75 sizes, 18 to 23 inch |
| Made in both | 52 sizes 205/40 R18225/40 R18225/45 R18235/40 R18245/35 R18245/40 R18245/45 R18255/35 R18255/40 R18275/35 R18275/40 R18225/35 R19and 40 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A99%B1% | A89%B11% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C67%D30%B3% | D47%C30%B17%A5% |
| EU label noise | 71-73 dB B100% | 69-75 dB B85%A15% |
| On the market since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Replaced | Bridgestone Potenza Sport (2021) | - |
| Awards | Winner: Supersports Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2026/27) | - |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Previous generation: Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport (10 shared tests)
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This is a head-to-head between two max-performance summer tires aimed at fast-road drivers and occasional track users: the newer Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo versus the older-but-popular Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport. Across three independent 2026 group tests (18-19 inch fitments), they're repeatedly measured in the areas that matter most for safety and pace-dry and wet braking, handling, aquaplaning, comfort/noise and efficiency.
The pattern is clear: the Potenza Sport Evo consistently lands near the top of each test (2nd/8, 2nd/8, 3rd/10) with standout braking and strong wet control, while the Eagle F1 SuperSport ranges from mid-pack to last (4th/8, 8th/8, 8th/10). The Goodyear still has a distinct appeal in ride comfort/feel and aquaplaning resistance, but the data suggests it's increasingly being outgunned by newer competitors-especially in wet safety and overall efficiency.
Conclusion
If you want the more complete, modern max-performance summer tire, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo is the decisive winner across these shared tests. It repeatedly delivers shorter stopping distances and higher on-limit pace: in one 235/35 R19 test it beat the Goodyear by 7.38% in wet braking (24.96 m vs 26.95 m) and 2.87% in dry braking (33.2 m vs 34.18 m). The gap becomes dramatic in the Autobild Sports Cars test, where the Bridgestone's wet braking advantage is 14.76% (43.9 m vs 51.5 m) and wet handling speed is 18.27% higher (75.1 km/h vs 63.5 km/h). ACE also reinforces the theme: Bridgestone's braking-led safety scoring is podium level, while Goodyear is merely “recommended” and relatively weak on economy.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport is easiest to justify if your priority is straight-line aquaplaning resistance and a pleasant, compliant feel for a performance tire. It wins aquaplaning in both tests where it's measured (by ~1%), and one test notes it warms up well and feels enjoyable/communicative. However, its braking is consistently mid-pack versus the Bridgestone, and rolling resistance is repeatedly worse (e.g., 10.4 vs 9.5 kg/t; 10.31 vs 9.21 kg/t), which has real-world implications for fuel/EV consumption and often correlates with a tire that's simply being left behind by newer compounds.
Practical takeaway: for fast-road safety and confidence-especially in the wet-the Potenza Sport Evo is the smarter, more future-proof choice. The Eagle F1 SuperSport remains likeable and may wear well and be priced attractively, but unless it's significantly cheaper in your size, it's hard to overlook the Bridgestone's clear advantage in the most safety-critical metrics.
Potenza Sport Evo vs Eagle F1 SuperSport: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo or the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport the better tire?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo finished ahead 3 times and the Eagle F1 SuperSport not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Potenza Sport Evo scores 9.5 and the Eagle F1 SuperSport 8.9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Potenza Sport Evo or the Eagle F1 SuperSport?
The Potenza Sport Evo led 5 of the 8 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 11.1% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Potenza Sport Evo led 5 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.9% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Potenza Sport Evo had 9.7% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.8/10 for the Potenza Sport Evo and 7.2/10 for the Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Potenza Sport Evo and 7.3/10 for the Eagle F1 SuperSport.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Potenza Sport Evo 85% from 16 reviews and the Eagle F1 SuperSport 84% from 66. 86% of Potenza Sport Evo owners would buy it again, against 81% for the Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Potenza Sport Evo is made in 115 sizes (16 to 22 inch) and the Eagle F1 SuperSport in 75 (18 to 23 inch). 52 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Potenza Sport Evo is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Eagle F1 SuperSport A and D.
Which is the newer tire?
The Potenza Sport Evo is the newer design: it reached the market in 2025, the Eagle F1 SuperSport in 2021. The Potenza Sport Evo replaced the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
8-1 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Continental SportContact 7
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
2-11 in 13 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
1-1 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Pirelli P Zero PZ4
2-3 in 6 shared tests
Every Bridgestone vs Goodyear test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion