In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Falken Azenis RS820 and the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S to find out which tire is best for your own driving.
The good news is that both the Falken Azenis RS820 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S are Max Performance Summer tires designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars, which means comparing the two tires is relatively simple.
Both tires are hugely popular in the market place with drivers, and both have been featured in independent tire tests.
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been one tests which compare both tires directly!
Out of these one tests:
While it might look like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is better than the Falken Azenis RS820 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was better during one dry braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S stopped the vehicle in 1.48% less distance than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Dry Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
2025 Sport Auto UUHP Tire Test 285/30 R20 |
Falken Azenis RS820:33.8M | ✓ Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: 33.3M |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was 2.24% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2025 Sport Auto UUHP Tire Test 285/30 R20 |
Falken Azenis RS820:126.4Km/H | ✓ Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: 129.3Km/H |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was better during one wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S stopped the vehicle in 6.4% less distance than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
2025 Sport Auto UUHP Tire Test 285/30 R20 |
Falken Azenis RS820:32.8M | ✓ Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: 30.7M |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was 0.63% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2025 Sport Auto UUHP Tire Test 285/30 R20 |
Falken Azenis RS820:79.4Km/H | ✓ Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: 79.9Km/H |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S floated at a 1.28% higher speed than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
2025 Sport Auto UUHP Tire Test 285/30 R20 |
Falken Azenis RS820:85.1Km/H | ✓ Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: 86.2Km/H |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis RS820 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Falken Azenis RS820 slipped out at a 2.99% higher speed than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Falken Azenis RS820
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
2025 Sport Auto UUHP Tire Test 285/30 R20 |
✓ Falken Azenis RS820:2.01m/sec2 | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: 1.95m/sec2 |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was better during one noise tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S measured 1.87% quieter than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Noise: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
2025 Sport Auto UUHP Tire Test 285/30 R20 |
Falken Azenis RS820:74.8dB | ✓ Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: 73.4dB |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis RS820 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Falken Azenis RS820 had a 2.2% lower rolling resistance than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Falken Azenis RS820
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
2025 Sport Auto UUHP Tire Test 285/30 R20 |
✓ Falken Azenis RS820:8.9kg / t | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: 9.1kg / t |
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Falken Azenis RS820 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S.
In total the Falken Azenis RS820 has been reviewed 4 times and drivers have given the tire 93% overall.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has been reviewed 139 times and drivers have given the tire 86% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S.
In conclusion the Falken Azenis RS820 performed better in curved aquaplaning and rolling resistance, while the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], wet braking, wet handling [km/h], straight aqua and noise.
Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S seems to be the best tire overall.
However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.
Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.