Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 83% · 70
- TR Score
- 8.1/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 15
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead 7 times and the Quatrac Pro+ not once. The AllSeasonContact 2 had 15.3% lower rolling resistance; the Quatrac Pro+ was 0.5 dB quieter.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Continental AllSeasonContact 2 for year-round safety, mixed-climate use (including real winter), and lower running costs. Pick Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus if you drive in milder climates, value a quieter, comfortable ride, and want to save on purchase price while accepting longer dry stops and average winter performance.
Where the AllSeasonContact 2 is stronger
- Class-leading balance with top-3 results across most tests
- Consistently shorter dry, wet, and snow braking distances
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved)
Where the Quatrac Pro+ is stronger
- Comfort 6/9 Was 0.5 dB quieter (7 tests)
The measured tallies (wins out of measurements in the shared tests) come straight from the tables below. The written verdict and bullet points are analysis of those tests and of owner reviews; where they and the figures disagree, the figures are right.
AllSeasonContact 2 vs Quatrac Pro+ at a glance
| Category | AllSeasonContact 2 | Gap | Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won7 shared tests | 7 | 0 | |
| Dry14 measurements | 14 | The AllSeasonContact 2 stopped 4.4% shorter in the dry (7 tests) | 0 |
| Wet31 measurements | 26 | The AllSeasonContact 2 held 9.2% more grip in curved aquaplaning (6 tests) | 3 |
| Snow24 measurements | 23 | The AllSeasonContact 2 was 9.6% quicker in the snow traction test (3 tests) | 1 |
| Ice3 measurements | 3 | The AllSeasonContact 2 stopped 7.1% shorter on ice (2 tests) | 0 |
| Comfort9 measurements | 3 | The Quatrac Pro+ was 0.5 dB quieter (7 tests) | 6 |
| Value9 measurements | 9 | The AllSeasonContact 2 had 15.3% lower rolling resistance (6 tests) | 0 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | The AllSeasonContact 2 by 1.4 | 8.1/10 |
| Owner rating70 and 15 reviews | 83% | The AllSeasonContact 2 by 2 points | 81% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 82% | The AllSeasonContact 2 by 3 points | 79% |
| Pricein the 6 tests that listed prices | +12.1% | The AllSeasonContact 2 was dearer in 6 of 6 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 140 | 92 sizes made in both | 103 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 7 tests, 2024 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | AllSeasonContact 2 | Field | Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Motor All Season Tire Test | P3 of 7 | P4 of 7 | |
| 2025 ADAC All Season Tire Test | P2 of 16 | P9 of 16 | |
| 2025 Auto Bild All Season Camper Van Tire Test | P4 of 9 | P7 of 9 | |
| 2024 Sport Auto All Season Tire Test | P1 of 6 | P6 of 6 | |
| 2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test | P1 of 10 | P7 of 10 | |
| 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tire Test | P2 of 9 | P6 of 9 | |
| The Best All Season Tires for 2024 / 2025 | P2 of 6 | P5 of 6 |
Performance profile
18 measurements from the 7 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
AllSeasonContact 2
Quatrac Pro+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 11 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
AllSeasonContact 2
Quatrac Pro+
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
AllSeasonContact 2
Quatrac Pro+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews and the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | AllSeasonContact 2 | Gap | Quatrac Pro+ | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 133 | 4.4% | 139 | 7-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 84.31 | 1.4% | 85.44 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 61.4 | 1% | 60.8 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 12.5% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 125 | 2% | 127 | 5-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 87 | 1.5% | 88 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 126 | 3.3% | 130 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 90.09 | 0.1% | 90.19 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 48.2 | 1.7% | 47.3 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.6% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.64 | 1.3% | 14.82 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 49.2 | 2.9% | 47.8 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.4 | 9.2% | 7.7 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 67 | 4.1% | 70 | 6-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.69 | 9.6% | 7.52 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 461 | 8.8% | 428 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 83.77 | 2.8% | 86.16 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 33.2 | 4.8% | 31.7 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 12.5% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.3 | 10% | 11.2 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.2 | 10% | 11.1 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 43 | 7.1% | 46 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.29 | 3.3% | 5.47 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.6% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.44 | 0.5 dB | 70.91 | 1-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29,950 | 3.7% | 28,894 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.31 | 15.3% | 7.46 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.7 | 1.7% | 5.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 67 | 14.1% | 78 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the AllSeasonContact 2 scores 9.5 and the Quatrac Pro+ 8.1 out of 10.
| AllSeasonContact 2 | Category | Quatrac Pro+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87 | Dry | 50 | ||
| 94 | Wet | 79 | ||
| 83 | Comfort | 66 | ||
| 74 | Value | 27 | ||
| 84 | Snow | 38 | ||
| 42 | Ice | 8 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| AllSeasonContact 2 | Category | Quatrac Pro+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | Dry Grip | 8.8 | ||
| 8.7 | Wet Grip | 8.9 | ||
| 8 | Road Feedback | 8.7 | ||
| 8 | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| 7.9 | Wear | 7.1 | ||
| 8.9 | Comfort | 8.1 | ||
| 8.3 | Snow Grip | 7.6 | ||
| 7.7 | Ice Grip | 6.8 | ||
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews and the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- 83%from 70 reviews
- 82%would buy again
- 667,287 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 highly overall (81% average), most often praising its smooth, comfortable ride and low noise levels, alongside very strong wet grip that inspires confidence. Dry grip is also widely viewed as secure and predictable, and around one in five owners report it coping well in snow for an all-season. The main recurring drawback is steering feel: around one in four owners describe softer, less immediate response, and tread life feedback is mixed, with a noticeable minority reporting faster-than-expected wear.
- Noticeably smoother, more comfortable ride
- Low cabin noise and a refined drive
- Excellent wet grip and confidence in the rain
- Strong dry grip and traction under acceleration
- Steering feels soft or delayed, with a dead spot for some drivers
- Tread life reports are inconsistent, with some seeing faster wear
- Handling can feel less sharp than expected in the dry
Summarised by AI from 61 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 70 AllSeasonContact 2 reviewsI chose XL-rated tires because I tend to drive a bit faster, and they provide better stability with less sidewall flex. I use them only during the winter, and they've been excellent. They are no noisier than winter tires, and in my experience they perform better in about 90% of winter conditions. The only exception is deep snow, where proper winter tires still have an advantage, although these tires handle it quite well too.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
- 81%from 15 reviews
- 79%would buy again
- 98,850 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners are broadly pleased with the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus, with 12 of 14 reviews scoring it positively and an average owner rating of 80.9%. The most consistent strengths are strong wet grip and reassuring all-round traction, with many also highlighting confident dry grip and capable performance in snow. A meaningful minority (around one in five) report a softer, less precise steering feel and a tire that needs a longer bedding-in period, and a similar share raise concerns over tread life or durability.
- Excellent wet grip, even in cold and wet conditions
- Strong dry grip with confidence for spirited driving
- Surprisingly capable snow traction
- Predictable dry handling
- Softer, less precise steering feel/feedback
- Noticeable bedding-in period before it feels at its best
- Reduced margin at the limit or a slight delay finding grip under load
Summarised by AI from 14 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 15 Quatrac Pro+ reviews"I purchased these all-season premium tires for my 4WD Subaru Outback, and I am extremely satisfied with them. As soon as they were installed, the car felt remarkably smooth and pleasant to drive.
The tires are wearing perfectly evenly, and I’ve already rotated them once. I used to be hesitant about all-season tires, but this brand completely convinced me that I made the right choice. While tire selection always depends on the specific car, driving style, and usage, these have worked out incredibly well for my Outback. Highly recommended!
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 140 sizes of the AllSeasonContact 2 and 103 of the Quatrac Pro+, 92 of them made in both.
| Category | AllSeasonContact 2 | Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 140 sizes, 15 to 22 inch | 103 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 92 sizes 205/40 R17205/45 R17205/50 R17205/55 R17215/40 R17215/45 R17215/50 R17215/55 R17215/60 R17215/65 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17and 80 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B98%C2% | B99%C1% |
| EU label rolling resistance | B75%C20%A4%D1% | C64%B20%D15%E1% |
| EU label noise | 70-73 dB B97%A3% | 70-75 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 248 of 248 | 139 of 139 |
| On the market since | - | 2023 |
| Replaced | Continental AllSeasonContact (2017) | - |
| Awards | Highly Recommended: Best All Season Tires (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Recommended: Best All Season Tires for SUVs (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: All-Season SUV Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2026/27) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The AllSeasonContact 2 was the dearer tire in 6 of the 6 tests that listed prices, by 12.1% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits Continental's premium AllSeasonContact 2 against Vredestein's value-focused Quatrac Pro Plus across seven shared professional tests spanning hatchback, SUV and camper-van fitments. The data paints a consistent picture: Continental targets balanced, safety-first performance with efficiency; Vredestein leans on comfort and wet grip value at a lower price point.
Across dry, wet, snow and efficiency metrics, the Continental repeatedly finishes near the top, with standout aquaplaning resistance and notably lower rolling resistance. Vredestein counters with quieter operation and flashes of strong wet braking, but shows weaker precision on dry roads and average winter capability compared with the class leaders.
Conclusion
Continental's AllSeasonContact 2 is the more complete tire: safer in the dry and on snow, very competitive in the wet, and consistently superior for aquaplaning resistance and rolling resistance. It converts that breadth into higher overall rankings in every shared test, plus better predicted mileage and lower abrasion in ADAC.
Vredestein's Quatrac Pro Plus offers credible wet performance, high ride comfort and the quieter cabin many commuters value, typically at a lower purchase price. However, its longer dry stops, softer steering precision and average winter metrics make it less confidence-inspiring in mixed or severe weather. If you prioritize all-round safety and efficiency, choose the Continental; if budget and cabin quiet take precedence in a milder climate, the Vredestein remains a sensible, comfortable option.
AllSeasonContact 2 vs Quatrac Pro+: your questions
Is the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ the better tire?
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead 7 times and the Quatrac Pro+ not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the AllSeasonContact 2 scores 9.5 and the Quatrac Pro+ 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the AllSeasonContact 2 or the Quatrac Pro+?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 26 of the 31 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 9.2% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 6 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 14 of the 14 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.4% shorter in the dry across 7 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 23 of the 24 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it was 9.6% quicker in the snow traction test across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The AllSeasonContact 2 had 15.3% lower rolling resistance (6 tests). Owners rate wear 7.9/10 for the AllSeasonContact 2 and 7.1/10 for the Quatrac Pro+.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Quatrac Pro+ was 0.5 dB quieter (7 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.9/10 for the AllSeasonContact 2 and 8.1/10 for the Quatrac Pro+.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews and the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15. 82% of AllSeasonContact 2 owners would buy it again, against 79% for the Quatrac Pro+.
Which is more expensive?
In the 6 tests that listed prices, the AllSeasonContact 2 was the dearer tire in 6 of them, by 12.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The AllSeasonContact 2 is made in 140 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the Quatrac Pro+ in 103 (17 to 22 inch). 92 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the AllSeasonContact 2 is graded B for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac Pro+ B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
10-15 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-4 in 13 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
15-1 in 17 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector All Season 4
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9-18 in 30 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-1 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport
2-4 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion