Menu

Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet

The Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.0
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
83%
Wet Grip
69%
Road Feedback
73%
Handling
67%
Wear
68%
Comfort
75%
Buy again
69%
13 Reviews
72% Average
102,516 miles driven
Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet

Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 13
Avg Rating: 72%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.12
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet

Questions and Answers for the Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
225/55 R17 $99.99 - $99.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
Available in 1 tire sizes - View all.

Top 3 Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet Reviews

Given 90% while driving a Fiat Bravo (225/50 R16 W) on mostly motorways for 500 spirited miles
My car has 16" wheels on it I wanted to increase cornering performance without increasing rim diameter thus I searched for stiff side walled tires. In a tire dealer I nearly checked 10-15 tires for side wall stiffness. I realized that maxxis tires are 3 to 4 times stiffer than Goodyear or Michelin's. I fitted m35 s to the car and my experience is unbelivable. Dry and wet is perfect. Noise is low. Comfort is good despite the stiff 50 sidewalls. Cornering stability is outstanding. My only critism is for straight line stability. The steering became a little null after these tires on straight line.


I bought this tire nearly half price than Continental sport contact and performs better. I dont know how long these tires last but I personally do not use tires more than 3years or 25-30k km.

Today if you search attentively you will see many cheap alternatives to reputable brands. Maxxis is no exceptiom from this aspect
November 11, 2017
Given 89% while driving a Mazda 6 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 18,000 spirited miles
Amazing tire, safe, predictable and incredibly capable! Car handles like its on rails. And guess what! Just to put paid to any knockers, and to confirm what we knew already, this tire has just been voted the worlds best tire by 'Choice' mag in Australia, and guess what else? 'Consumer' mag in NZ has arrived at the same conclusion, ahead of Yokohama Pirelli Conti Goodyear Bridgestone Toyo GT and a whole lot of others! see www.consumer.org.nz
November 12, 2014
Given 93% while driving a Renault Megane RS250 CUP (235/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Please dont listen to a couple of berks reviews on here ! I have bought a lot of tires in my life and changing from continentals to these has been fantastic, the conti's were lumpy noisey and wear rate was pretty fast, the maxxis m35's were a little more than half the price and twice as good ! I am using them on my renault megan sport which eats commodore v8's for breakfast and have timed it at 5.9 seconds to 100kmh....a true performance car, these tires are excellent.
August 20, 2014

How would you rate the Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet Reviews

Given 51% while driving a Skoda Octavia vRS (225/40 R18) on mostly town for 5,000 spirited miles
My Diesel Skoda isn't exactly standard, running a 6.6 second 0-100 however I have major struggles getting any grip out of these tires at all. It will spin 1st, 2nd and sometimes 3rd once my car gets boost. I'm not sure how thick the side wall is but they seem to feel like they roll a lot when cornering fast. Personally, I wouldn't buy these tires again.
One good point is they seem to handle water on the road fine.
July 28, 2015
Given 83% while driving a Nissan R33 GTST 2.5 turbo RWD (245/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
235/40/18 and 245/40/18 (rear)

Bought these tires 5yrs ago (due for renewal now though) after coming from using the Kuhmo ecta sport and falken FK451's.

They were the only brand avialable at the time. So i trusted them after seeing so much of the company sponsoring cars at drifting events.

The MA35 is a summer tire which i was a little unsure about as i use the car all year round as a weekend blaster and it lives outside. During the warm months the tire is planted offering plenty of grip, predictable, comfort- hard to tell on coilovers, road noise no more than previous brands mentioned. It's a loud car any way. During colder months i think it can become a hard tire so needs a bit of heat in it to help it work...

In the wet they do fine aswell plenty of grooves to expel water. Until obviously getting down to the wear markers where im at now on the rear. They easliy spin up in 3rd when rolling and planting it reaching full boost. The roads do get greasy so no tire will grip. Also operating temps will have an effect. Combination of everthing once worn makes them pretty useless, but when dry again still really good and grippy.

Note: The tires are 5 yrs old the fronts have cracks on the outer tread pattern- rubbers going off. The rears are fine no cracks but are worn out, maybe they get to temp quicker and don't dry out?

I would buy again depending on price (£470 for four last time). Currently looking at cost of these, kuhmos and falkens again to do all four.

Used the Kuhmos on the Nurburgring a few years ago and once the pressures were adjusted t oallow for expansion it was a great tire with plenty of grip-which makes me want to go back to that brand on past harsh use on track.

Car is @420bhp rwd only, no traction control or fancy stuff. Just raw driving.
March 18, 2015
Given 89% while driving a Mercedes Benz C220 Cdi Avantgarde Estate (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 16 spirited miles
Excellent tire, cannot understand how others can find them so bad. I drive a quite a lot on motorways and dual carriageways for my work as a management consultant, but also as I live in a rural area have to travel on country roads. I have found the cornering in the dry is exceptional and compared to other premium brands (eg Michelin)the wear rate and road noise are lower, although they still wear quicker than I hoped. Admittedly, The grip in the wet around corners is not the best but it is fine unless you drive far too fast (and NO I am not talking about 20-30 mph as being too fast);straight line stopping is no problem at all.

Footnote to wet weather driving. I think we often forget just how greasy roads can get after the first falls of rain until the loose rubber and muck have been washed away. I have certainly spun on a nearby large roundabout at speeds that one can normally take quite happily in the dry, only to realize this is just after fresh rainfall.
December 13, 2013
Given 34% while driving a Ford Falcon BFII XR6 (235/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 3,000 average miles
Loud, uncomfortable, lumpy, not good! Horrible acceleration/braking grip in the wet. No confidence in these at all.
April 3, 2013
Given 43% while driving a Mazda 5 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Running 205/50/17's on a Mazda 5 Sport.
The good point - lasting ages, have done 10,000 miles and not half worn yet.
The Bad Points - Grip or lack of it. Slightest sign of a greasy road and these just give in and off you go sideways on normal cornering or she just understeers towards whatever obstacle in is direct line. As for dring in any sort of snow, forget it. My 5 was always good in the snow with the last set of tires I had but with these you just sit there wheelspinning. So unless you live somewhere that has no adverse weather I would avoid at all costs
March 26, 2013
Given 90% while driving a Subaru Impreza (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 5,000 average miles
225/45R17 280 AA A rating, in my experience is a good combination of high performance and comfort package. It gives ample grip wet & dry, reasonably low rolling resistance, and quiet. perfect fit for semi sport and my daily commute. Felt better response in braking time and stiff sidewall made my cornering more precise. Also love the fact that the rim can sit deeper and better protected. With price paid over all the goodies given, i would definitely buy again.
September 23, 2011
Given 90% while driving a Audi A4 Avant 2.0T Quattro (235/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
good tires, very comfortable, provides very good grip on wet and dry and overall im very satisfied. better than kumho's, nexens and even pirellis.
June 5, 2011
Given 79% while driving a Volvo S40 Sport Lux (195/60 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Great tires, better than goodyear or firestone. They have good grip specially for wet grip and are comfortable. I recomend them. On par with perhaps Dunlop or Bridgestone.
August 6, 2010
Given 89% while driving a Volkswagen (215/55 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
It is an incredible tire. Just write this because of the bad reviews that made the first review. It's a very quiet and comfortable tire at a time despite being deported. UNDERSTAND THE SPORT TIRES ARE NOT TO LAST 100,000 MILES
THANK YOU! : D
July 25, 2010
Given 20% while driving a Volvo S80 D5 (225/55 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 15,000 easy going miles
Don't buy these -awful ride
April 30, 2010
Rate the Maxxis M35 Victra Asymmet