Menu

Giti GitiComfort

The Giti GitiComfort is a Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.0
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
81%
Wet Grip
65%
Road Feedback
68%
Handling
68%
Wear
79%
Comfort
66%
Buy again
48%
10 Reviews
68% Average
190,465 miles driven
Giti GitiComfort

Giti GitiComfort

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 10
Avg Rating: 67.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.09
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Giti GitiComfort

Questions and Answers for the Giti GitiComfort

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Giti GitiComfort. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 9 user reviews

Drivers of the Giti GitiComfort report a generally comfortable, stable tire with adequate dry grip and predictable handling for everyday use. However, many criticize its wet performance-citing early lockup, understeer, and weak traction/braking-while several note noticeable road noise at speed. Experiences vary by variant: some (e.g., XA1) praise wet confidence, while others (e.g., 228v1, T20) fare worse in the rain. Overall sentiment skews mixed-positive given strong comfort/stability feedback but meaningful wet and noise concerns.

Strengths
  • Comfortable ride/plushness
  • Stable at highway speeds
  • Predictable handling
  • Adequate dry grip
Areas for Improvement
  • Poor wet grip/traction and braking
  • Road noise at highway speeds

Top 3 Giti GitiComfort Reviews

Given 46% while driving a Toyota Camry (235/45 R18) on mostly town for 10,000 spirited miles
I've used Giticomfort 228v1 for my front tires on my 2005 Toyota Camry as replacement for my Michelin Primacy 3st and I can tell right away that 228v1's comfort is quite different with Primacy 3st. It produces more low frequency sound and is quite noisy on high speeds, though it is not bad for bumpy roads. Wet isn't the best. ABS works heavily on normal wet braking which indicates it's not good in the wet. Its treadlife is average. Steering is less precise as Primacy but it's good enough for comfort. I would recommend this tire to those seeking for a budget friendly tire that is better than other cheaper chinese like Westlake etc. but don't expect really good dry and wet grip. Premium tires like Michelins will still be better in everything but at a premium cost.
May 20, 2025
Given 73% while driving a BYD Qin Pro (215/50 R17) on mostly town for 47,845 spirited miles
Tire Model & Regional Reference​​

My tire model is Giti Comfort 228v1. As a Chinese consumer, I'm unsure if this tire is sold in Europe or whether its formulation is identical to regional variants. Therefore, this review is for your reference only.

​​Road Conditions & Usage Scenario​​

Road conditions in China are generally good. I drive primarily on asphalt pavements, rarely on concrete surfaces, and almost never on gravel roads.

​​Usage Duration & Vehicle Configuration​​

I have used these tires for nearly six years, covering 77,000 kilometers. They were installed on a front-wheel-drive sedan with 160 horsepower.

​​Wear Status & Replacement Decision​​

The tires shown in the image were mounted on the front axle. You can observe their aging and wear: ​​the outer drainage grooves are nearly depleted​​. Although the tread depth had not reached the 1.6mm safety indicators (minimum legal tread depth), I replaced them proactively.Only the 77,000km photo is current; others were taken earlier.

​​Tire Rotation Habit & Current Handling​​

I did not perform tire rotation—a poor maintenance habit. This resulted in significantly better condition for the rear tires. I have now moved them to the front axle and plan to use them for a limited period. ​​Despite being six years old​​, I will replace them before my next long-distance trip for safety reasons.

​​Subjective Performance Evaluation​​

1. ​​Limits & Handling​​
Frankly, I rarely sensed the tire’s limits; they almost never slipped except during snow or steep uphill starts. I doubt other tires would perform markedly better under such conditions. For handling, they responded swiftly and predictably during rapid lane changes without unnecessary instability.

(Note: As a non-professional driver without experience in top-tier tires, my assessment may be limited—but I find them satisfactory for daily use.)

2. ​​Core Flaw: Noise Issue​​
Their most significant flaw is noise. ​​Despite Giti’s official claims of "quiet and comfortable," they are extremely loud​​. This became starkly evident after I replaced two tires with genuinely quiet ones: the noise contrast between the front axle (Giti 228v1) and rear axle (new tires) is now dramatic.
August 13, 2025
Given 66% while driving a Toyota Camry (215/60 R16) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
I have a GitiComfort T20 in my Camry XV30 and it is what it is. A comfort tire. It is decent on dry roads but performs poorly on wet roads. It locks up really easily in the wet and it happened to me twice. It also understeers a lot even at low speeds when wet. For everyday city drive in summer time this is ok. Would not recommend for those who may want some performance in the wet.
December 1, 2023

How would you rate the Giti GitiComfort?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Giti GitiComfort Reviews

Given 53% while driving a BYD Seal U EV (235/50 R19) on mostly motorways for 23,000 average miles
Good dry grip, very bad wet grip specially when going over a puddle the car skids dangerously. The tire is not suitable for EVs, they’ve eaten through half the tread wear in the first year (25,000 Km). As for comfort they’re fine I guess not a lot of noise but noticeable discomfort over small bumps.
November 28, 2025
Given 37% while driving a Chery Tiggo 7 (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
This is the worst tire I've ever experienced on a wet road on a test car (it was DR Evo 5 which I couldn't chose in the pop up menu). There is literally no grip - I have had more grip on snow covered roads with winter tires than I had on wet roads with these. They are also unpleasingly noisy and generally feel like they're made of plastic instead of rubber. In the dry they are "okay" in a sense that they're at least not dangerous. They squeal, grip is sub-average, but at least they seem like they try. In the wet they completely give up. Understeer everywhere, no traction, no braking. Dangerous tire, would not recommend.
September 11, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 89% while driving a Toyota Sienta (205/50 R16) on a combination of roads for 500 average miles
The tires exhibit great levels of plushness, superior ride quality.
The tires also gave the steering greater heft. Made the car more stable and surefooted on highway speeds, but also less direct and agile around tight corners.
June 6, 2024
Given 58% while driving a Volkswagen Tiguan 2.0 TSI 200HP (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 60,000 average miles
Very noisy on highway
April 19, 2022
Given 97% while driving a Volkswagen (215/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I was pleasantly surprised with these Giti COMFORT XA1's. I had used the Michelin CrossClimate 2's before which is an amazing tire, but they don't do them in 215/65/17. So we opted for the Manufacturers listed Tire ( our car is a US VW Tiguan SE 4-Motion 2.0 TSI). Without bedding them in we drove up a mountain in torrential rain. The roads were so steep hairpins/switchbacks that on the way back down the Hill Decent Control kicked it. Then we jumped on a highway for 150 miles in serious hard driving rain. I was impressed. Now bedded in, they're great in the dry and the humid heat of Arkansas, the biggest issue here really is potholes. For WInter I would happily buy a set of steel rims and stick cross climate 2's on, but at the moment these things are much better than I would have imagined. I would certainly buy them again
April 25, 2021
Given 80% while driving a Peugeot 1.4 HDi (175/65 R14 H) on for 120 spirited miles
had equip (replace Hankook H308) these new Tire to my small car(Proton Iriz) to try on as it is still new for malaysia market, 1st impression is the road noise reduce drastically compare to hankook tire and the handling also improving. Try it for few hundrad miles and may notice that it also capable to handle some small uneven road bounce with confident. Turning Quit accurate but not as good as Bridgestone EP300
May 8, 2019
Rate the Giti GitiComfort