Menu

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

The Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is a Premium Touring Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.0
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
70%
Wet Grip
80%
Road Feedback
63%
Handling
65%
Wear
73%
Comfort
64%
Buy again
94%
Snow Grip
100%
Ice Grip
98%
6 Reviews
79% Average
62,500 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 1st)
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

Winter Premium
BETA
7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 2
Period: 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 78.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.09
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tire Test Consumer Reports 2020 215/60 R16 1/17 0 metrics
The Best Winter Tires for 2020 Tire Reviews 2020 205/55 R16 1/19 0 metrics
2
Tests
1st
Average
1st
Best
1st
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
1st/19
The Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 improved on the WS80, which is an American market favourite extreme winter tire.
Excellent snow traction and braking on ice. Fair handling, but typical of many winter / snow tires.

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
205/65 R16 $140.99 - $140.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
215/60 R17 $152.99 - $152.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
215/70 R15 $127.99 - $127.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
225/50 R17 $188.99 - $188.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
235/55 R17 $173.99 - $173.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
245/50 R18 $234.99 - $234.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
Available in 52 tire sizes - View all.

Review Summary

Based on 6 user reviews

Drivers of the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 largely praise its outstanding snow and ice traction and confidence-inspiring winter performance, especially in extreme cold. Handling and comfort in dry/warm conditions are commonly noted as weaker, with some reporting increased noise and a firmer ride. Wear durability feedback is mixed to positive, with at least one high-mileage user reporting strong longevity. Overall sentiment is positive, with winter grip as the standout strength and dry-road refinement a tradeoff.

Strengths
  • Snow and ice grip
  • Winter confidence and control
  • Highway stability in winter
  • Value vs competitors
  • Tread life (reported by some)
Areas for Improvement
  • Dry handling/steering feel
  • Ride firmness/comfort
  • Road noise

Top 3 Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 Reviews

Given 79% while driving a Subaru 2.0 Crosstrek (235/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
This morning I drove on mostly dry roads at 23f/5c going an average of (55mph/88.5kmh). It handled well during any lane changes, has good acceleration from a stop and has a pleasant feeling ride. On a separate road trip last week, also dry roads, but almost exclusively highway driving (65-80mph/100-130kmh) I had a similar experience albeit with a little more road noise than I cared for. In dry or wet I don't like the handling too much for roundabouts and in general turns at speed. The tires are excellent in snow, slush and ice.
March 13, 2025
Given 80% while driving a Mercury Grand marquis (215/70 R15) on mostly country roads for 2,000 average miles
Incredible snow traction, almost impossible to get stuck with these on. Even in the worst wet and icy snow conditions, they simply dig in until they find grip and get you out again, and hold the road well in ice and freezing rain. A true winter specific choice that is worth the purchase if you live where there is snow on the ground up to five months out of the year.

On my car, a classic old fashioned RWD full size car with no traction controls and good ground clearance, it will easily climb through snow that comes to the very bottom of the undercarriage, even up a grade. With some skill and weight on the rear axle, you can escape about any snow condition as good as a 4x4. Even tonight I was driving in freezing rain, and it wanted to handle as if it were near dry pavement. Impressive.

My only complaint is ride quality, as it certainly rides much rougher than all season tires. I drive luxury cars that have extremely good ride quality, and the difference is easy to feel. Not sure if it is the tread pattern, as it almost seems to be riding on cogs rather than a smooth tire. No real road noise of vibration, but a very definite "firm" feel that translates back into the ride quality.

I use these tires exclusively in the long winters we have, so dry condition driving is limited in my case. They certainly don't feel as nice or seem to grip as well as all season tires I've had of similar size on this and similar cars of the same type on dry, warm conditions. I cannot comment on tire wear, as I drive several old automobiles, and have a limited mileage lifestyle.

All in all, they are exactly what a winter setup should be expected to be. Almost unbelievable high snow and cold performance, all at the sacrifice of warm weather comfort and control.
November 8, 2023
Given 84% while driving a Toyota Camry (205/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 2,500 average miles
WS90 work much better than Michelin CrossClimate2s in below -10°C weather and on hard ice. The CC2s are excellent on snow. WS90s allow decent acceleration on a front-two wheel drive camry. There is a small amount of slip on initial acceleration on ice. I found them better than my previous Michelin Xi2s for handling and braking dry and wet. They also cost less than Michelin X-ice tires. But, have not had them long enough (bought mid-Jan 2022) to know how well they will wear. Overall, a great tire for extreme cold -35°C and icy roads in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. P.S. check your report of Consumer Reports test. Their test says braking in wet conditions is fair not handling which is good in their test. You stated that Consumer Reports said that handling is below average. Not so.
October 18, 2022

How would you rate the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 Reviews

Given 74% while driving a BMW 3 series (225/50 R17) on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles
I bought a used set of these tires already mounted on rims for my XDrive BMW Wagon. They already had about 2 seasons worth of wear on them but had plenty of life.
Snow and ice grip was unbelievable--driving up to Quebec from Massachusetts in a blizzard I was able to maintain speed and grip the entire time without so much as a wiggle on greasy, slushy, and snowy roads. Highway performance was fantastic, crossing lanes did not cause my car to dive to one side or the other while driving over the slush humps between lanes. These tires excel in the worst conditions and I felt a ton of confidence driving in the winter with these. Snow feels like it isn't even there, I cannot overstate how planted these tires are.
That's not to say there are no tradeoffs, however. These tires are LOUD. From about 10 mph on up there is an audible hum that got worse as the tires aged, not so loud as to be annoying but I had to turn my stereo up; my car was noticeably quieter when re-mounting my all seasons in the spring. The soft rubber in the compound leads to very vague steering, lots of sidewall flexing, and a very underwhelming handling in the dry. They also get softer in the warmer ends of the season which exacerbates these characteristics. The plush sidewalls do help make frost heaves much less violent so I see it as a plus in deep winter driving. They also never cold spotted on me.

Ultimately these are fantastic winter tires for extreme conditions. I replaced mine after 3 more seasons of use because they were beginning to dry rot (2019 mfd) and I was beginning to notice uneven wearing across the tread which I cannot fault the tires for necessarily. Living in New England as of late we don't get much in the way of blizzards and often get mid season rain/ice, and these tires felt like more extreme winters than I needed. I opted to purchase a set of Vredestein Wintrac Pros (no +) to replace them because I no longer drive in the worst of conditions. If I lived in a snowier climate or was obligated to travel no matter the weather I wouldn't hesitate to buy these again. These are some exceptional winter tires, but know that they are all about utility.
As I bought mine used I am generous with the wear rating.
December 2, 2025
Mercedes Benz GLA45 (245/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
They do not feel as good as my previous set of WS80s. They are louder than the WS80s were and a but harder or rougher feel in dry condition. In cold rain and in ice and snow, they are exactly what is needed. Just disappointed in dry conditions compared to the WS80's I used previously.
April 16, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 80% while driving a Volkswagen Golf Mk7 Sportwagen Alltrack 1.8TSI (215/60 R17) on mostly country roads for 30,000 spirited miles
These tires have been held up really well. I have just over 30,000 miles on them with maybe 15-20% life left. I have used these tires year round due to my seasonal lifestyle. Alaska for the summer and western ski areas during the winter. They have great grip in all directions in snow and ice and when they do break free it's very smooth and controlled. They held up well in warmer conditions holding a surprising amount of grip when the temps got above 50 degrees Fahrenheit. I can't speak to noise since I have a roof box and basket that create plenty of racket.
January 8, 2022
Rate the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90