Menu

Test Charts / Die Reifentester

2026 Die Reifentester Summer Tire Test - 235/55 R18

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
235/55 R18
Tires tested
6
Disciplines
9
Test vehicle
Audi Q3 2.0 TDI

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
110 ft Best 0 mph
112 ft +2 ft 11 mph
117 ft +7 ft 19 mph
117 ft +7 ft 19 mph
122 ft +12 ft 25 mph
128 ft +18 ft 30 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (18 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Falken ZIEX ZE320 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
7.9 Points Best
7.8 Points -0.10 Points
7.7 Points -0.20 Points
7.6 Points -0.30 Points
7.3 Points -0.60 Points
7.3 Points -0.60 Points

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (0.6 Points).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
111 ft Best 0 mph
112 ft +1 ft 3 mph
115 ft +4 ft 14 mph
119 ft +8 ft 20 mph
120 ft +9 ft 21 mph
124 ft +13 ft 25 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.3% (13 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 would still be travelling at 25 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.2 Points Best
8.2 Points Best
7.9 Points -0.30 Points
7.6 Points -0.60 Points
7.6 Points -0.60 Points
7.1 Points -1.10 Points

The difference between best and worst was 13.4% (1.1 Points).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
50.2 mph Best
50.0 mph -0.2 mph
48.8 mph -1.4 mph
48.3 mph -1.9 mph
48.2 mph -2.0 mph
47.7 mph -2.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5% (2.5 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.1 ft/s² Best
7.2 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
7.1 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
6.9 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
6.9 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
6.6 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 18.3% (1.5 ft/s²).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.1 Points Best
7.9 Points -0.20 Points
7.8 Points -0.30 Points
7.7 Points -0.40 Points
7.7 Points -0.40 Points
7.3 Points -0.80 Points

The difference between best and worst was 9.9% (0.8 Points).

Subj. Noise

Subjective in car noise levels

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.2 Points Best
7.9 Points -0.30 Points
7.8 Points -0.40 Points
7.8 Points -0.40 Points
7.6 Points -0.60 Points
7.3 Points -0.90 Points

The difference between best and worst was 11% (0.9 Points).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.3 kg/t Best $0
6.3 kg/t Best $0
6.7 kg/t +0.40 kg/t $19
6.8 kg/t +0.50 kg/t $23
7.2 kg/t +0.90 kg/t $42
7.3 kg/t +1.00 kg/t $47

The difference between best and worst was 15.9% (1 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Continental PremiumContact 7 uses about 13 gal ($47) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.