Test Charts / Auto Express
2026 Auto Express Summer Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 9
- Test vehicle
- Audi A3
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 118 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 119 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 120 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 123 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 124 ft | +6 ft | 18 mph | |
| 126 ft | +8 ft | 20 mph | |
| 126 ft | +8 ft | 20 mph | |
| 135 ft | +17 ft | 28 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 14.4% (17 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dynamo STREET H MH01 would still be travelling at 28 mph when the Falken ZIEX ZE320 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 53.5 s | Best | |
| 53.71 s | +0.21 s | |
| 53.99 s | +0.49 s | |
| 54.2 s | +0.70 s | |
| 54.2 s | +0.70 s | |
| 54.26 s | +0.76 s | |
| 54.26 s | +0.76 s | |
| 54.87 s | +1.37 s |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 82 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 86 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 88 ft | +6 ft | 21 mph | |
| 89 ft | +7 ft | 22 mph | |
| 89 ft | +7 ft | 22 mph | |
| 90 ft | +8 ft | 23 mph | |
| 91 ft | +9 ft | 25 mph | |
| 106 ft | +24 ft | 38 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 28.3% (24 ft ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dynamo STREET H MH01 would still be travelling at 38 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 88 s | Best | |
| 88.62 s | +0.62 s | |
| 88.71 s | +0.71 s | |
| 88.89 s | +0.89 s | |
| 89.34 s | +1.34 s | |
| 89.61 s | +1.61 s | |
| 90.72 s | +2.72 s | |
| 97.02 s | +9.02 s |
The difference between best and worst was 10.3% (9.02 s).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 s | Best | |
| 11.52 s | +0.02 s | |
| 11.66 s | +0.16 s | |
| 11.68 s | +0.18 s | |
| 11.93 s | +0.43 s | |
| 12.07 s | +0.57 s | |
| 13.61 s | +2.11 s | |
| 13.76 s | +2.26 s |
The difference between best and worst was 19.7% (2.26 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 52.8 mph | Best | |
| 51.6 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 48.7 mph | -4.1 mph | |
| 48.4 mph | -4.4 mph | |
| 48.4 mph | -4.4 mph | |
| 47.8 mph | -5.0 mph | |
| 47.2 mph | -5.6 mph | |
| 45.4 mph | -7.4 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 14.1% (7.4 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 12.5 ft/s² | Best | |
| 12.3 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 11.8 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 11.3 ft/s² | -1.2 ft/s² | |
| 11.2 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 10.9 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.0 ft/s² | -2.5 ft/s² | |
| 9.5 ft/s² | -3.0 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 23.7% (3 ft/s²).
Comfort
1Noise
Internal noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 68 dB | Best | |
| 68.4 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 68.9 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 69.1 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 69.3 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 69.7 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 69.8 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 69.8 dB | +1.80 dB |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.53 kg/t | +0.53 kg/t | $22 | |
| 7.87 kg/t | +0.87 kg/t | $37 | |
| 8.05 kg/t | +1.05 kg/t | $44 | |
| 8.06 kg/t | +1.06 kg/t | $44 | |
| 8.43 kg/t | +1.43 kg/t | $60 | |
| 8.61 kg/t | +1.61 kg/t | $68 | |
| 9.37 kg/t | +2.37 kg/t | $99 |
The difference between best and worst was 33.9% (2.37 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Dynamo STREET H MH01 uses about 28 gal ($99) more fuel than the Michelin Primacy 5.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 49.7 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/50 R1716 tires tested
6 of these 8 tires tested again
2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tire Test
205/55 R1610 tires tested
5 of these 8 tires tested again
2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tire Test
235/45 R1810 tires tested
5 of these 8 tires tested again

