Menu

Test Charts / TUV

2025 TUV Test of Nokian SeasonProof 2 vs Rivals

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
205/55 R16
Tires tested
5
Disciplines
8

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
110 ft Best
111 ft +1 ft
112 ft +2 ft
115 ft +5 ft
124 ft +14 ft

The difference between best and worst was 12.8% (14 ft ≈ 1 Car Lengths).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
113 ft Best
114 ft +1 ft
115 ft +2 ft
122 ft +9 ft
129 ft +16 ft

The difference between best and worst was 14.3% (16 ft ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
82 s Best
82.9 s +0.90 s
84 s +2.00 s
85 s +3.00 s
87.8 s +5.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.1% (5.8 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
53.0 mph Best
53.0 mph Best
52.8 mph -0.2 mph
51.9 mph -1.1 mph
50.9 mph -2.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4% (2.1 mph).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
59 ft Best
59 ft 0 ft
59 ft 0 ft
62 ft +3 ft
65 ft +6 ft

The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths).

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
4 s Best
4.01 s +0.01 s
4.1 s +0.10 s
4.1 s +0.10 s
4.31 s +0.31 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.7% (0.31 s).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
84.7 s Best
85 s +0.30 s
85.9 s +1.20 s
89.1 s +4.40 s
93.5 s +8.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 10.4% (8.8 s).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.3 kg/t Best $0
6.8 kg/t +0.50 kg/t $23
7 kg/t +0.70 kg/t $33
7.4 kg/t +1.10 kg/t $51
7.7 kg/t +1.40 kg/t $65

The difference between best and worst was 22.2% (1.4 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 uses about 18 gal ($65) more fuel than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.