Menu

Test Charts / Auto Zeitung

2025 AZ Performance Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
245/45 R19
Tires tested
10
Disciplines
19
Test vehicle
BMW 520d Touring

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

3

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
139 ft Best 0 mph
140 ft +1 ft 8 mph
142 ft +3 ft 12 mph
142 ft +3 ft 12 mph
143 ft +4 ft 13 mph
143 ft +4 ft 13 mph
146 ft +7 ft 18 mph
147 ft +8 ft 19 mph
148 ft +9 ft 20 mph
152 ft +13 ft 23 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9% (13 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 would still be travelling at 23 mph when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
75.2 s Best
75.6 s +0.40 s
75.8 s +0.60 s
75.9 s +0.70 s
75.9 s +0.70 s
76.3 s +1.10 s
76.3 s +1.10 s
76.6 s +1.40 s
76.7 s +1.50 s
77.3 s +2.10 s

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
30 Points Best
28 Points -2.00 Points
26 Points -4.00 Points
25 Points -5.00 Points
23 Points -7.00 Points
22 Points -8.00 Points
20 Points -10.00 Points
18 Points -12.00 Points
15 Points -15.00 Points
13 Points -17.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 56.7% (17 Points).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
159 ft Best
162 ft +3 ft
166 ft +7 ft
168 ft +9 ft
169 ft +10 ft
172 ft +13 ft
173 ft +14 ft
175 ft +16 ft
175 ft +16 ft
186 ft +27 ft

The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
84.9 s Best
85.3 s +0.40 s
86.3 s +1.40 s
86.4 s +1.50 s
86.5 s +1.60 s
87.2 s +2.30 s
88.1 s +3.20 s
88.4 s +3.50 s
89.1 s +4.20 s
91.5 s +6.60 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (6.6 s).

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
45 Points Best
42 Points -3.00 Points
38 Points -7.00 Points
35 Points -10.00 Points
34 Points -11.00 Points
33 Points -12.00 Points
31 Points -14.00 Points
30 Points -15.00 Points
25 Points -20.00 Points
19 Points -26.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 57.8% (26 Points).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
12.26 s Best
12.35 s +0.09 s
12.43 s +0.17 s
12.52 s +0.26 s
12.63 s +0.37 s
12.67 s +0.41 s
12.67 s +0.41 s
12.68 s +0.42 s
12.72 s +0.46 s
13.16 s +0.90 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.3% (0.9 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
56.5 mph Best
56.1 mph -0.4 mph
54.8 mph -1.7 mph
54.8 mph -1.7 mph
54.7 mph -1.8 mph
54.7 mph -1.8 mph
54.6 mph -1.9 mph
53.9 mph -2.6 mph
53.7 mph -2.8 mph
53.1 mph -3.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (3.4 mph).

Snow

5

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
84 ft Best 0 mph
85 ft +1 ft 7 mph
85 ft +1 ft 9 mph
86 ft +2 ft 10 mph
86 ft +2 ft 12 mph
86 ft +2 ft 12 mph
87 ft +3 ft 13 mph
87 ft +3 ft 13 mph
89 ft +5 ft 18 mph
91 ft +7 ft 21 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (7 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Linglong Sport Master Winter would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
804 lbf Best
782 lbf -22 lbf
773 lbf -31 lbf
769 lbf -35 lbf
754 lbf -50 lbf
732 lbf -72 lbf
722 lbf -82 lbf
699 lbf -105 lbf
695 lbf -109 lbf
681 lbf -123 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 15.2% (123 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
68 s Best
68.1 s +0.10 s
68.3 s +0.30 s
70.7 s +2.70 s
70.8 s +2.80 s
71.1 s +3.10 s
71.2 s +3.20 s
71.6 s +3.60 s
72.4 s +4.40 s
73.7 s +5.70 s

The difference between best and worst was 8.4% (5.7 s).

Subj. Snow Handling

Subjective Snow Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
29 Points Best
27 Points -2.00 Points
25 Points -4.00 Points
23 Points -6.00 Points
21 Points -8.00 Points
19 Points -10.00 Points
18 Points -11.00 Points
15 Points -14.00 Points
13 Points -16.00 Points
12 Points -17.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 58.6% (17 Points).

Snow Circle

Lateral snow grip in m/s squared

Higher is better ↑
Snow Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
12.7 ft/s² Best
12.7 ft/s² 0.0 ft/s²
12.3 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
12.1 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
11.8 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
11.4 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
11.4 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
11.1 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -2.2 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 17.8% (2.2 ft/s²).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 25% (2 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
70.3 dB Best
70.5 dB +0.20 dB
71.1 dB +0.80 dB
71.2 dB +0.90 dB
71.8 dB +1.50 dB
72 dB +1.70 dB
72.4 dB +2.10 dB
72.7 dB +2.40 dB
73.3 dB +3.00 dB
76.2 dB +5.90 dB

The difference between best and worst was 8.4% (5.9 dB).

Value

4

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
29,049 miles Best
27,185 miles -1,864 miles
25,321 miles -3,728 miles
24,855 miles -4,194 miles
24,700 miles -4,349 miles
19,418 miles -9,631 miles
19,263 miles -9,786 miles
18,952 miles -10,097 miles
17,709 miles -11,340 miles
17,088 miles -11,961 miles

The difference between best and worst was 41.2% (11,961 miles).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
12.72 Price/1000 Best €27.93
13.52 Price/1000 +0.80 Price/1000 €36.87
19.2 Price/1000 +6.48 Price/1000 €37.92
22.52 Price/1000 +9.80 Price/1000 €44.96
23.08 Price/1000 +10.36 Price/1000 €50.26
23.32 Price/1000 +10.60 Price/1000 €41.61
24.52 Price/1000 +11.80 Price/1000 €42.31
25.28 Price/1000 +12.56 Price/1000 €47.91
27.12 Price/1000 +14.40 Price/1000 €49.82
28 Price/1000 +15.28 Price/1000 €54.82

The difference between best and worst was 120.1% (15.28 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Triangle Effexwinter) works out €672 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Wintrac Pro+).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2025 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.6 kg/t Best $0
7.9 kg/t +0.30 kg/t $12
8.2 kg/t +0.60 kg/t $23
8.2 kg/t +0.60 kg/t $23
8.2 kg/t +0.60 kg/t $23
8.4 kg/t +0.80 kg/t $31
8.7 kg/t +1.10 kg/t $43
8.7 kg/t +1.10 kg/t $43
9.3 kg/t +1.70 kg/t $66
9.6 kg/t +2.00 kg/t $77

The difference between best and worst was 26.3% (2 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 21 gal ($77) more fuel than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Millimeter of tread lost per 1000km driven

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TireResultGap to best
0.12 mm/1000km Best
0.14 mm/1000km +0.02 mm/1000km
0.15 mm/1000km +0.03 mm/1000km
0.15 mm/1000km +0.03 mm/1000km
0.15 mm/1000km +0.03 mm/1000km
0.19 mm/1000km +0.07 mm/1000km
0.2 mm/1000km +0.08 mm/1000km
0.21 mm/1000km +0.09 mm/1000km
0.22 mm/1000km +0.10 mm/1000km
0.22 mm/1000km +0.10 mm/1000km

The difference between best and worst was 83.3% (0.1 mm/1000km).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.