Test Charts / Auto Zeitung
2025 AZ Performance Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 245/45 R19
- Tires tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 19
- Test vehicle
- BMW 520d Touring
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
3Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 139 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 140 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 142 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 142 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 143 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 143 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 146 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 147 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 148 ft | +9 ft | 20 mph | |
| 152 ft | +13 ft | 23 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 9% (13 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 would still be travelling at 23 mph when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 75.2 s | Best | |
| 75.6 s | +0.40 s | |
| 75.8 s | +0.60 s | |
| 75.9 s | +0.70 s | |
| 75.9 s | +0.70 s | |
| 76.3 s | +1.10 s | |
| 76.3 s | +1.10 s | |
| 76.6 s | +1.40 s | |
| 76.7 s | +1.50 s | |
| 77.3 s | +2.10 s |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Points | Best | |
| 28 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 26 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 25 Points | -5.00 Points | |
| 23 Points | -7.00 Points | |
| 22 Points | -8.00 Points | |
| 20 Points | -10.00 Points | |
| 18 Points | -12.00 Points | |
| 15 Points | -15.00 Points | |
| 13 Points | -17.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 56.7% (17 Points).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 159 ft | Best | |
| 162 ft | +3 ft | |
| 166 ft | +7 ft | |
| 168 ft | +9 ft | |
| 169 ft | +10 ft | |
| 172 ft | +13 ft | |
| 173 ft | +14 ft | |
| 175 ft | +16 ft | |
| 175 ft | +16 ft | |
| 186 ft | +27 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 84.9 s | Best | |
| 85.3 s | +0.40 s | |
| 86.3 s | +1.40 s | |
| 86.4 s | +1.50 s | |
| 86.5 s | +1.60 s | |
| 87.2 s | +2.30 s | |
| 88.1 s | +3.20 s | |
| 88.4 s | +3.50 s | |
| 89.1 s | +4.20 s | |
| 91.5 s | +6.60 s |
The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (6.6 s).
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 45 Points | Best | |
| 42 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 38 Points | -7.00 Points | |
| 35 Points | -10.00 Points | |
| 34 Points | -11.00 Points | |
| 33 Points | -12.00 Points | |
| 31 Points | -14.00 Points | |
| 30 Points | -15.00 Points | |
| 25 Points | -20.00 Points | |
| 19 Points | -26.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 57.8% (26 Points).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 12.26 s | Best | |
| 12.35 s | +0.09 s | |
| 12.43 s | +0.17 s | |
| 12.52 s | +0.26 s | |
| 12.63 s | +0.37 s | |
| 12.67 s | +0.41 s | |
| 12.67 s | +0.41 s | |
| 12.68 s | +0.42 s | |
| 12.72 s | +0.46 s | |
| 13.16 s | +0.90 s |
The difference between best and worst was 7.3% (0.9 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 56.5 mph | Best | |
| 56.1 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 54.8 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 54.8 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 54.7 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 54.7 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 54.6 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 53.9 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 53.7 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 53.1 mph | -3.4 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (3.4 mph).
Snow
5Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 84 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 85 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 85 ft | +1 ft | 9 mph | |
| 86 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 86 ft | +2 ft | 12 mph | |
| 86 ft | +2 ft | 12 mph | |
| 87 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 87 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 89 ft | +5 ft | 18 mph | |
| 91 ft | +7 ft | 21 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (7 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Linglong Sport Master Winter would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 804 lbf | Best | |
| 782 lbf | -22 lbf | |
| 773 lbf | -31 lbf | |
| 769 lbf | -35 lbf | |
| 754 lbf | -50 lbf | |
| 732 lbf | -72 lbf | |
| 722 lbf | -82 lbf | |
| 699 lbf | -105 lbf | |
| 695 lbf | -109 lbf | |
| 681 lbf | -123 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 15.2% (123 lbf).
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 68 s | Best | |
| 68.1 s | +0.10 s | |
| 68.3 s | +0.30 s | |
| 70.7 s | +2.70 s | |
| 70.8 s | +2.80 s | |
| 71.1 s | +3.10 s | |
| 71.2 s | +3.20 s | |
| 71.6 s | +3.60 s | |
| 72.4 s | +4.40 s | |
| 73.7 s | +5.70 s |
The difference between best and worst was 8.4% (5.7 s).
Subj. Snow Handling
Subjective Snow Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Points | Best | |
| 27 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 25 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 23 Points | -6.00 Points | |
| 21 Points | -8.00 Points | |
| 19 Points | -10.00 Points | |
| 18 Points | -11.00 Points | |
| 15 Points | -14.00 Points | |
| 13 Points | -16.00 Points | |
| 12 Points | -17.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 58.6% (17 Points).
Snow Circle
Lateral snow grip in m/s squared
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 12.7 ft/s² | Best | |
| 12.7 ft/s² | 0.0 ft/s² | |
| 12.3 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 12.1 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 11.8 ft/s² | -0.9 ft/s² | |
| 11.4 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 11.4 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 11.3 ft/s² | -1.4 ft/s² | |
| 11.1 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.5 ft/s² | -2.2 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 17.8% (2.2 ft/s²).
Comfort
2Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 25% (2 Points).
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.3 dB | Best | |
| 70.5 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 71.1 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 73.3 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 76.2 dB | +5.90 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 8.4% (5.9 dB).
Value
4Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 29,049 miles | Best | |
| 27,185 miles | -1,864 miles | |
| 25,321 miles | -3,728 miles | |
| 24,855 miles | -4,194 miles | |
| 24,700 miles | -4,349 miles | |
| 19,418 miles | -9,631 miles | |
| 19,263 miles | -9,786 miles | |
| 18,952 miles | -10,097 miles | |
| 17,709 miles | -11,340 miles | |
| 17,088 miles | -11,961 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 41.2% (11,961 miles).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.72 Price/1000 | Best | €27.93 | |
| 13.52 Price/1000 | +0.80 Price/1000 | €36.87 | |
| 19.2 Price/1000 | +6.48 Price/1000 | €37.92 | |
| 22.52 Price/1000 | +9.80 Price/1000 | €44.96 | |
| 23.08 Price/1000 | +10.36 Price/1000 | €50.26 | |
| 23.32 Price/1000 | +10.60 Price/1000 | €41.61 | |
| 24.52 Price/1000 | +11.80 Price/1000 | €42.31 | |
| 25.28 Price/1000 | +12.56 Price/1000 | €47.91 | |
| 27.12 Price/1000 | +14.40 Price/1000 | €49.82 | |
| 28 Price/1000 | +15.28 Price/1000 | €54.82 |
The difference between best and worst was 120.1% (15.28 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Triangle Effexwinter) works out €672 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Wintrac Pro+).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2025 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.6 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.9 kg/t | +0.30 kg/t | $12 | |
| 8.2 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | $23 | |
| 8.2 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | $23 | |
| 8.2 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | $23 | |
| 8.4 kg/t | +0.80 kg/t | $31 | |
| 8.7 kg/t | +1.10 kg/t | $43 | |
| 8.7 kg/t | +1.10 kg/t | $43 | |
| 9.3 kg/t | +1.70 kg/t | $66 | |
| 9.6 kg/t | +2.00 kg/t | $77 |
The difference between best and worst was 26.3% (2 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 21 gal ($77) more fuel than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Abrasion
Millimeter of tread lost per 1000km driven
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 0.12 mm/1000km | Best | |
| 0.14 mm/1000km | +0.02 mm/1000km | |
| 0.15 mm/1000km | +0.03 mm/1000km | |
| 0.15 mm/1000km | +0.03 mm/1000km | |
| 0.15 mm/1000km | +0.03 mm/1000km | |
| 0.19 mm/1000km | +0.07 mm/1000km | |
| 0.2 mm/1000km | +0.08 mm/1000km | |
| 0.21 mm/1000km | +0.09 mm/1000km | |
| 0.22 mm/1000km | +0.10 mm/1000km | |
| 0.22 mm/1000km | +0.10 mm/1000km |
The difference between best and worst was 83.3% (0.1 mm/1000km).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 Winter Tire Braking Test - 50 Sets
245/45 R1950 tires tested
8 of these 10 tires tested again
2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tires tested
8 of these 10 tires tested again
2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
245/45 R1920 tires tested
7 of these 10 tires tested again
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P / Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
This test’s winner finished 5th there
