Menu

Triangle Effexwinter

Touring Winter Winter rated

The Triangle Effexwinter is an economy winter touring tire with low measured noise, short dry braking and low cost per kilometer in its single test. Dry and snow handling and projected tread life were all last in that comparison.

The quick answer

Owners say No owner reviews yet. Review this tire
Tests say 7th average finish across 1 independent tests Latest: P7 of 10 · 2025 See every test
Strengths & weaknesses Comfort, Value Dry, Snow Relative to its rivals across every test we hold

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated October 2025.

  • 1professional tests

Tire Reviews Score

Triangle Effexwinter

7.2/10

Better than 51% of winter tires

  • Limited Confidence
  • 1 test
Scores of the 278 winter tires we have tested

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent tests1 test · 1 publication · 2025 51% 100%
Owner reviewsNo owner reviews yet – 0%
Combined 51% 7.2

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Category by category

How it compares with other winter tires in each area, and how much each area counts. 50 is the middle of the group.

Category Better than Weight Tests
WetBraking, handling and aquaplaning in the wet 72% 30% 1
SnowBraking, traction and handling on snow 12% 23% 1
IceBraking, traction and handling on ice Not tested, counted as average 18% –
DryBraking and handling on dry roads 25% 17% 1
ValueWear, efficiency and cost 83% 6% 1
ComfortNoise and ride comfort 97% 5% 1

Faded bars rest on one or two tests.

By discipline

The same results grouped by what the tire was doing. They are not counted a second time.

BrakingEvery braking test, on any surface 95% 1
TractionEvery traction test, on any surface 41% 1
HandlingEvery handling test, on any surface 18% 1

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Its own test results decide 83% of the test figure. The other 17% is the average for its group, and it shrinks as more tests arrive.

High needs at least 3 tests, with its own results deciding 90% or more. Medium needs 2 tests and 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as tests arrive.

The tests behind it

  1. 2025 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 245/45 R19 P7 / 10
1 Tests
0 Test Wins
7th Average
7th Best
7th Worst
The latest test

2025 AZ Performance Winter Tire Test P7 of 10

The Triangle EffeXWinter TW421 represents the cheapest option in this test at just 87.50 euros per tire, but significant performance compromises accompany that low price. On snow, the tire manages acceptable grip levels though it becomes unstable in borderline conditions and exhibits sensitive responses to load changes that score only 12/30 for driving safety - not confidence-inspiring when conditions deteriorate. In wet weather, it delivers the second-best braking result surprisingly, and drives with pleasingly stable characteristics scoring 30/45 for safety, showing that budget tires can perform respectably in some areas. Dry performance reveals the best exterior noise result at 70.3 dB(A) and strong braking, though the handling suffers from instability during load changes scoring 13/30 for safety. The tire's environmental credentials are poor with high wear of 0.223 mm per 1000 km, short projected life of only 17,088 miles, and the shortest actual lifespan in the test. While it offers the lowest cost per kilometer at 3.18 euros, this calculation doesn't account for the safety compromises. The Triangle might suit extremely budget-conscious buyers in regions with minimal winter conditions, but its unpredictable handling and poor durability make it difficult to recommend.

Strong: Dry Braking, Subj. Comfort, Noise, Value Weak: Dry Handling, Subj. Dry Handling, Wet Circle, Snow Handling, Subj. Snow Handling, Snow Circle, Wear, Abrasion Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

Every independent test of the Triangle Effexwinter, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20252025 AZ Performance Winter Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 245/45 R19P7 / 10
Running Costs
View Test

In 245/45 R19, the Triangle Effexwinter is projected to cost €27.93 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €698 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tire Test.

Triangle Effexwinter€27.93
Tire purchase + fittingExtra fuel vs the most efficient tirecost per 1,000 miles
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2025 test; financing costs are excluded.
Dimensions & Label Scores
View All

Size Range64 sizes available

205-315Width35-60Profile16-21Rim91-114 H-WLoad/Speed Index2024First On Market

EU LabelAcross 64 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.

Noise

71-75dB A/B

3PMSF on every size

Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Triangle Effexwinter in the wet?
Across the 1 wet-braking test it has featured in, the Triangle Effexwinter stops 4.5% longer than premium rivals, 2.1% shorter than mid-range rivals and 1.3% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews wet score of 72/100.
How good is the Triangle Effexwinter in the dry?
Across the 1 dry-braking test it has featured in, the Triangle Effexwinter stops 2.6% shorter than premium rivals, 4.3% shorter than mid-range rivals and 1.4% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews dry score of 25/100.
How good is the Triangle Effexwinter in the snow?
Across the 1 snow-braking test it has featured in, the Triangle Effexwinter stops 1.1% longer than premium rivals, 1.1% shorter than mid-range rivals and 4.7% shorter than budget rivals. Across the 1 snow-traction test, it is 5% worse than premium rivals, 2.8% better than mid-range rivals and 5.3% better than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews snow score of 12/100.
How fuel efficient is the Triangle Effexwinter?
Across the 1 test measuring rolling resistance, the Triangle Effexwinter's rolling resistance is 0.5% higher than premium rivals, 6.1% lower than mid-range rivals and 14.6% lower than budget rivals.
How many miles does the Triangle Effexwinter last?
Based on test and owner data, the Triangle Effexwinter is expected to last around 17,088 miles (27,500 km).
More questions about the Triangle Effexwinter (3)
How much does the Triangle Effexwinter cost to run?
In 245/45 R19, the Triangle Effexwinter is projected to cost €27.93 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €698 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tire Test. Of the tires compared in that test, that makes it the cheapest to run.
What is the Triangle Effexwinter's EU tire label rating?
Across its range, the Triangle Effexwinter most commonly carries EU label ratings of C for fuel efficiency, B for wet grip and 72 dB for noise.
What sizes does the Triangle Effexwinter come in?
The Triangle Effexwinter is available in 64 sizes, ranging from 205-315/35-60 R16-21.
Owner Questions
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Triangle Effexwinter

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Triangle Effexwinter. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!

Triangle Effexwinter Owner Reviews

Have you driven on the Triangle Effexwinter tire?

Unfortunately we don't yet have any tire reviews of the Triangle Effexwinter but people are searching for information on it.

Please help millions of other drivers make an informed tire choice and pick the correct tires for their car by submitting your review of the Effexwinter.

Review Your Tires

Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.