Menu

Test Charts / Auto Zeitung

2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
205/55 R16
Tires tested
14
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
150 ft Best 0 mph
153 ft +3 ft 10 mph
153 ft +3 ft 11 mph
155 ft +5 ft 14 mph
156 ft +6 ft 15 mph
156 ft +6 ft 16 mph
157 ft +7 ft 16 mph
157 ft +7 ft 16 mph
158 ft +8 ft 18 mph
159 ft +9 ft 19 mph
160 ft +10 ft 20 mph
160 ft +10 ft 20 mph
164 ft +14 ft 23 mph
164 ft +14 ft 23 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (14 ft ≈ 1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the King Meiler Winter Tact WT81 would still be travelling at 23 mph when the Hankook Winter i cept RS2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
10 Points Best
9 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
4 Points -6.00 Points
4 Points -6.00 Points
3 Points -7.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 70% (7 Points).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
167 ft Best 0 mph
178 ft +11 ft 20 mph
178 ft +11 ft 20 mph
181 ft +14 ft 22 mph
182 ft +15 ft 23 mph
182 ft +15 ft 23 mph
182 ft +15 ft 23 mph
187 ft +20 ft 26 mph
187 ft +20 ft 26 mph
191 ft +24 ft 28 mph
192 ft +25 ft 29 mph
194 ft +27 ft 30 mph
202 ft +35 ft 33 mph
221 ft +54 ft 39 mph

The difference between best and worst was 32.2% (54 ft ≈ 3.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the King Meiler Winter Tact WT81 would still be travelling at 39 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
10 Points Best
9 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
4 Points -6.00 Points
3 Points -7.00 Points
2 Points -8.00 Points
2 Points -8.00 Points
1 Points -9.00 Points
1 Points -9.00 Points
1 Points -9.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 90% (9 Points).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
52.9 mph Best
51.4 mph -1.5 mph
51.1 mph -1.8 mph
51.0 mph -1.9 mph
49.8 mph -3.1 mph
49.6 mph -3.3 mph
49.3 mph -3.6 mph
48.0 mph -4.9 mph
47.7 mph -5.2 mph
47.5 mph -5.4 mph
46.6 mph -6.3 mph
44.6 mph -8.3 mph
44.2 mph -8.7 mph
41.7 mph -11.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 21.2% (11.2 mph).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
84 ft Best 0 mph
84 ft Best 0 mph
85 ft +1 ft 7 mph
85 ft +1 ft 9 mph
85 ft +1 ft 9 mph
86 ft +2 ft 10 mph
86 ft +2 ft 10 mph
86 ft +2 ft 11 mph
86 ft +2 ft 12 mph
87 ft +3 ft 14 mph
87 ft +3 ft 14 mph
87 ft +3 ft 14 mph
89 ft +5 ft 18 mph
90 ft +6 ft 19 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Toyo Snowprox S954 would still be travelling at 19 mph when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
493 lbf Best
489 lbf -4 lbf
488 lbf -5 lbf
488 lbf -5 lbf
484 lbf -9 lbf
482 lbf -11 lbf
482 lbf -11 lbf
481 lbf -12 lbf
479 lbf -14 lbf
477 lbf -16 lbf
469 lbf -24 lbf
467 lbf -26 lbf
465 lbf -28 lbf
458 lbf -35 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 7% (35 lbf).

Subj. Snow Handling

Subjective Snow Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
10 Points Best
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
4 Points -6.00 Points
3 Points -7.00 Points
2 Points -8.00 Points
2 Points -8.00 Points
1 Points -9.00 Points
1 Points -9.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 90% (9 Points).

Comfort

1

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
10 Points Best
10 Points Best
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
4 Points -6.00 Points
1 Points -9.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 90% (9 Points).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
8.06 kg/t Best $0
8.17 kg/t +0.11 kg/t $4
8.26 kg/t +0.20 kg/t $7
8.4 kg/t +0.34 kg/t $12
8.47 kg/t +0.41 kg/t $15
8.48 kg/t +0.42 kg/t $15
8.74 kg/t +0.68 kg/t $25
8.81 kg/t +0.75 kg/t $27
8.88 kg/t +0.82 kg/t $30
9.12 kg/t +1.06 kg/t $39
9.21 kg/t +1.15 kg/t $42
9.22 kg/t +1.16 kg/t $42
9.41 kg/t +1.35 kg/t $49
9.42 kg/t +1.36 kg/t $50

The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (1.36 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 uses about 14 gal ($50) more fuel than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.