Test Charts / Auto Bild
2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 245/45 R18
- Tires tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 12
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
122 ft | -15 ft |
| 137 ft | Best | |
| 143 ft | +6 ft | |
| 143 ft | +6 ft | |
| 144 ft | +7 ft | |
| 144 ft | +7 ft | |
| 144 ft | +7 ft | |
| 145 ft | +8 ft | |
| 145 ft | +8 ft | |
| 145 ft | +8 ft | |
| 146 ft | +9 ft | |
| 146 ft | +9 ft | |
| 147 ft | +10 ft | |
| 148 ft | +11 ft | |
| 148 ft | +11 ft | |
| 149 ft | +12 ft | |
| 150 ft | +13 ft | |
| 150 ft | +13 ft | |
| 151 ft | +14 ft | |
| 151 ft | +14 ft | |
| 153 ft | +16 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 25% (31 ft ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
68.9 mph | +0.2 mph |
| 68.7 mph | Best | |
| 68.7 mph | 0.0 mph | |
| 68.6 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 68.6 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 68.4 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 68.4 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 68.3 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 68.2 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 68.1 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 68.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 68.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 67.9 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 67.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 67.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 67.2 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 67.1 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 66.5 mph | -2.2 mph | |
| 66.4 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 66.2 mph | -2.5 mph | |
| 66.1 mph | -2.6 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 4.1% (2.8 mph).
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 155 ft | Best | |
| 158 ft | +3 ft | |
RefReference Summer |
161 ft | +6 ft |
| 163 ft | +8 ft | |
| 164 ft | +9 ft | |
| 166 ft | +11 ft | |
| 170 ft | +15 ft | |
| 175 ft | +20 ft | |
| 175 ft | +20 ft | |
| 176 ft | +21 ft | |
| 176 ft | +21 ft | |
| 177 ft | +22 ft | |
| 177 ft | +22 ft | |
| 180 ft | +25 ft | |
| 180 ft | +25 ft | |
| 180 ft | +25 ft | |
| 180 ft | +25 ft | |
| 180 ft | +25 ft | |
| 184 ft | +29 ft | |
| 186 ft | +31 ft | |
| 186 ft | +31 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 19.9% (31 ft ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 46.2 mph | Best | |
| 46.2 mph | Best | |
| 46.2 mph | 0.0 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
46.0 mph | -0.2 mph |
| 45.9 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 45.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 45.5 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 45.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 45.1 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 45.1 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 44.7 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 44.7 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 44.6 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 44.6 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 44.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 44.3 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 44.3 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 43.8 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 43.6 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 43.5 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 43.2 mph | -3.0 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 6.5% (3 mph).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
58.2 mph | +1.5 mph |
| 56.7 mph | Best | |
| 55.8 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 55.7 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 55.7 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 55.1 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 55.0 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 55.0 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 54.7 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 54.5 mph | -2.2 mph | |
| 54.5 mph | -2.2 mph | |
| 54.4 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 54.4 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 54.2 mph | -2.5 mph | |
| 53.5 mph | -3.2 mph | |
| 53.4 mph | -3.3 mph | |
| 52.9 mph | -3.8 mph | |
| 52.2 mph | -4.5 mph | |
| 52.1 mph | -4.6 mph | |
| 51.6 mph | -5.1 mph | |
| 50.9 mph | -5.8 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 12.6% (7.3 mph).
Snow
3Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 80 ft | Best | |
| 80 ft | 0 ft | |
| 80 ft | 0 ft | |
| 81 ft | +1 ft | |
| 81 ft | +1 ft | |
| 81 ft | +1 ft | |
| 81 ft | +1 ft | |
| 81 ft | +1 ft | |
| 82 ft | +2 ft | |
| 82 ft | +2 ft | |
| 82 ft | +2 ft | |
| 82 ft | +2 ft | |
| 82 ft | +2 ft | |
| 83 ft | +3 ft | |
| 83 ft | +3 ft | |
| 83 ft | +3 ft | |
| 84 ft | +4 ft | |
| 85 ft | +5 ft | |
| 85 ft | +5 ft | |
| 86 ft | +6 ft | |
RefReference Summer |
168 ft | +88 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 110.7% (88 ft ≈ 6 Car Lengths).
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 696 lbf | Best | |
| 681 lbf | -15 lbf | |
| 677 lbf | -19 lbf | |
| 676 lbf | -20 lbf | |
| 676 lbf | -20 lbf | |
| 672 lbf | -24 lbf | |
| 661 lbf | -35 lbf | |
| 658 lbf | -38 lbf | |
| 654 lbf | -42 lbf | |
| 650 lbf | -46 lbf | |
| 648 lbf | -48 lbf | |
| 647 lbf | -49 lbf | |
| 646 lbf | -50 lbf | |
| 645 lbf | -51 lbf | |
| 642 lbf | -54 lbf | |
| 637 lbf | -59 lbf | |
| 636 lbf | -60 lbf | |
| 635 lbf | -61 lbf | |
| 624 lbf | -72 lbf | |
| 516 lbf | -180 lbf | |
RefReference Summer |
94 lbf | -602 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 86.4% (602 lbf).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 38.2 mph | Best | |
| 38.1 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 38.0 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 37.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 37.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 37.7 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 37.7 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 37.7 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 37.4 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 37.4 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 37.3 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 37.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 37.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 37.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 37.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 37.1 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 37.0 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 37.0 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 36.8 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 35.7 mph | -2.5 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
23.7 mph | -14.5 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 38% (14.5 mph).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.7 dB | Best | |
| 69.7 dB | Best | |
| 70.1 dB | +0.40 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
70.4 dB | +0.70 dB |
| 70.6 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 70.7 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71.1 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 71.1 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 71.3 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 71.4 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 72.8 dB | +3.10 dB | |
| 72.8 dB | +3.10 dB | |
| 74.2 dB | +4.50 dB | |
| 74.2 dB | +4.50 dB | |
| 74.7 dB | +5.00 dB | |
| 74.8 dB | +5.10 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 7.3% (5.1 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 29,807 miles | Best | |
| 27,769 miles | -2,038 miles | |
| 27,514 miles | -2,293 miles | |
| 27,005 miles | -2,802 miles | |
| 26,750 miles | -3,057 miles | |
| 26,750 miles | -3,057 miles | |
| 26,495 miles | -3,312 miles | |
| 26,241 miles | -3,566 miles | |
| 25,986 miles | -3,821 miles | |
| 25,221 miles | -4,586 miles | |
| 24,967 miles | -4,840 miles | |
| 24,967 miles | -4,840 miles | |
| 24,712 miles | -5,095 miles | |
| 24,712 miles | -5,095 miles | |
| 24,457 miles | -5,350 miles | |
| 24,457 miles | -5,350 miles | |
| 23,183 miles | -6,624 miles | |
| 21,910 miles | -7,897 miles | |
| 20,890 miles | -8,917 miles | |
| 18,598 miles | -11,209 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 37.6% (11,209 miles).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.41 Price/1000 | Best | €28.87 | |
| 11.12 Price/1000 | +0.71 Price/1000 | €29.09 | |
| 11.18 Price/1000 | +0.77 Price/1000 | €30.33 | |
| 11.6 Price/1000 | +1.19 Price/1000 | €25.74 | |
| 11.69 Price/1000 | +1.28 Price/1000 | €33.21 | |
| 11.77 Price/1000 | +1.36 Price/1000 | €31.80 | |
| 12.08 Price/1000 | +1.67 Price/1000 | €29.58 | |
| 12.08 Price/1000 | +1.67 Price/1000 | €32.57 | |
| 12.83 Price/1000 | +2.42 Price/1000 | €29.62 | |
| 12.99 Price/1000 | +2.58 Price/1000 | €32.56 | |
| 13.33 Price/1000 | +2.92 Price/1000 | €34.31 | |
| 13.55 Price/1000 | +3.14 Price/1000 | €29.96 | |
| 13.8 Price/1000 | +3.39 Price/1000 | €28.10 | |
| 14.56 Price/1000 | +4.15 Price/1000 | €37.85 | |
| 14.68 Price/1000 | +4.27 Price/1000 | €28.87 | |
| 14.72 Price/1000 | +4.31 Price/1000 | €34.87 | |
| 14.73 Price/1000 | +4.32 Price/1000 | €34.31 | |
| 14.77 Price/1000 | +4.36 Price/1000 | €30.32 | |
| 15.22 Price/1000 | +4.81 Price/1000 | €33.08 | |
| 16.22 Price/1000 | +5.81 Price/1000 | €28.94 |
The difference between best and worst was 55.8% (5.81 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Fulda Kristall Control HP2) works out €303 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Wintrac Pro).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2020 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.95 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.35 kg/t | +0.40 kg/t | $17 | |
| 7.42 kg/t | +0.47 kg/t | $20 | |
| 7.59 kg/t | +0.64 kg/t | $27 | |
| 7.67 kg/t | +0.72 kg/t | $30 | |
| 7.83 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | $37 | |
| 7.95 kg/t | +1.00 kg/t | $42 | |
| 7.97 kg/t | +1.02 kg/t | $43 | |
| 8.18 kg/t | +1.23 kg/t | $52 | |
| 8.23 kg/t | +1.28 kg/t | $54 | |
| 8.26 kg/t | +1.31 kg/t | $55 | |
| 8.34 kg/t | +1.39 kg/t | $59 | |
| 8.44 kg/t | +1.49 kg/t | $63 | |
| 8.5 kg/t | +1.55 kg/t | $66 | |
| 8.52 kg/t | +1.57 kg/t | $66 | |
| 8.53 kg/t | +1.58 kg/t | $67 | |
| 8.59 kg/t | +1.64 kg/t | $69 | |
| 8.67 kg/t | +1.72 kg/t | $73 | |
| 8.69 kg/t | +1.74 kg/t | $74 | |
| 8.85 kg/t | +1.90 kg/t | $80 |
The difference between best and worst was 27.3% (1.9 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro uses about 22 gal ($80) more fuel than the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2020 Winter Tire Market Overview - 52 Tire Braking Test
245/45 R1848 tires tested
20 of these 20 tires tested again
2019 Winter Tire Test Market Overview
225/45 R1747 tires tested
15 of these 20 tires tested again
2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tires tested
11 of these 20 tires tested again

