Hankook Ventus Evo vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 24
- TR Score
- 8.4/10
- Owners say
- 70% · 18
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Ventus Evo finished ahead 4 times and the N Fera Sport SU2 once. The Ventus Evo lasted 18.5% longer in the wear tests; the N Fera Sport SU2 was 0.9 dB quieter.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Hankook Ventus Evo if you want the strongest all-round summer performance with the most consistent braking safety margins and better measured wear/value. Choose the Nexen N'Fera Sport SU2 if you're shopping to a tighter budget and prioritize low noise and a friendly, predictable sporty feel-accepting that outright braking and precision generally won't match the Hankook, especially in the most heavily weighted test categories.
Where the Ventus Evo is stronger
- Consistently class-leading braking: wins dry and wet braking in all 5 shared tests (e.g., 42.7 m vs 48.3 m wet braking in Auto Bild 2025)
- Stronger objective handling pace in most datasets (e.g., dry handling 120.9 vs 114.7 km/h; wet handling 83.6 vs 82.0 km/h)
- Better longevity and cost-per-km where measured (e.g., 56,310 km vs 47,810 km in Auto Bild 2026; better value metric)
Where the N Fera Sport SU2 is stronger
- Often quieter and more refined on noise metrics (wins noise in 3 shared tests)
- Generally good ride comfort for the price; described as not driving like the cheapest tire in its group
- Competent, predictable handling balance for everyday sporty driving; mid-pack circle performance in AutoView
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Ventus Evo vs N Fera Sport SU2 at a glance
| Category | Ventus Evo | Gap | N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won5 shared tests | 4 | 1 | |
| Dry10 measurements | 8 | The Ventus Evo stopped 2.5% shorter in the dry (5 tests) | 2 |
| Wet14 measurements | 13 | The Ventus Evo stopped 5.3% shorter in the wet (5 tests) | 1 |
| Comfort6 measurements | 1 | The N Fera Sport SU2 was 0.9 dB quieter (3 tests) | 4 |
| Value5 measurements | 4 | The Ventus Evo lasted 18.5% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) | 1 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.4/10 | The Ventus Evo by 1.0 | 8.4/10 |
| Owner rating24 and 18 reviews | 86% | The Ventus Evo by 16 points | 70% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 78% | The Ventus Evo by 40 points | 38% |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | +12.8% | The Ventus Evo was dearer in 2 of 2 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 106 | 75 sizes made in both | 138 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 5 tests, 2025 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Ventus Evo | Field | N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 AutoView Sport Tire Test | P6 of 7 | P5 of 7 | |
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test | P1 of 20 | P9 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P2 of 50 | P3 of 50 | |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test | P4 of 20 | P14 of 20 | |
| 2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout | P3 of 52 | P16 of 52 |
Performance profile
12 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Ventus Evo
N Fera Sport SU2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 3 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Ventus Evo
N Fera Sport SU2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Ventus Evo
N Fera Sport SU2
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the N Fera Sport SU2 70% from 18. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Ventus Evo | Gap | N Fera Sport SU2 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 112 | 2.5% | 115 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69.1 | 3.8% | 66.5 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 20.2% | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 44.2 | 1.5% | 44.9 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 109 | 5.3% | 116 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 48.8 | 2.2% | 47.8 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 19.2% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.56 | 2.5% | 14.94 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 53.2 | 0.7% | 53.6 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10.7 | 3.9% | 10.4 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 2.4% | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 64.78 | 0.9 dB | 63.91 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30,370 | 18.5% | 25,660 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.19 | 0.6% | 8.23 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,470 | 14.5% | 1,719 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ventus Evo scores 9.4 and the N Fera Sport SU2 8.4 out of 10.
| Ventus Evo | Category | N Fera Sport SU2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | Dry | 78 | ||
| 99 | Wet | 76 | ||
| 50 | Comfort | 91 | ||
| 47 | Value | 29 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Ventus Evo | Category | N Fera Sport SU2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.3 | Dry Grip | 8.1 | ||
| 9.2 | Wet Grip | 7.7 | ||
| 8.3 | Road Feedback | 7.8 | ||
| 9 | Handling | 7.7 | ||
| 7.8 | Wear | 5.6 | ||
| 7.9 | Comfort | 6.4 | ||
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the N Fera Sport SU2 70% from 18. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Hankook Ventus Evo
- 86%from 24 reviews
- 78%would buy again
- 106,316 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Hankook Ventus Evo very highly overall, with most praising strong dry and wet grip that inspires confidence. A clear majority also highlight low road noise and a comfortable, compliant ride for an everyday performance tire. The main drawback is steering feel: around one in three owners say it lacks initial feedback or sharpness versus premium rivals, even if outright grip remains strong.
- Very strong dry grip
- Very strong wet grip
- Generally quiet at speed
- Comfortable, compliant ride
- Steering feel lacks feedback/initial bite for some drivers
- Can be a bit noisy on certain surfaces or at particular speeds
- Ride can feel slightly firm on low-profile fitments
Summarised by AI from 21 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 24 Ventus Evo reviewsI bought set of these in SUV version to replace OEM worn-out Bridgestone Dueller tires. The Hankooks were one of few options available in size for Lexus RX and the price was very good. Obviously, they are sport-biased, not intended for a comfortable relaxed SUV. Their grip both in dry and wet is perfect, steering precise. But, they are not the choice for maximum comfort and silence. Winter set (Conti 870P) in the same size are significantly quieter and more comfortable. However, these tires are a smart choice- good price, peak safety and also good wear- after 20000km stil about 4-5mm. I would buy them again, but not for RX.
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- 70%from 18 reviews
- 38%would buy again
- 141,160 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers describe the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 as a strong value-focused performance tire with very good dry and wet grip, confident handling, and stability at speed for the money. However, a large share of users report short tread life (often with heavy/uneven shoulder wear) and many also mention poor refinement as the tire ages, including increased road noise and a harsher ride. Overall sentiment is mixed, with performance praised but longevity and comfort commonly limiting repeat purchases.
- Very good dry grip and handling
- Strong wet grip and confidence in rain
- Good value/price versus premium brands
- Stable and predictable at higher speeds
- Fast wear/short tread life (often uneven shoulder wear)
- High road noise and mediocre comfort/harsh ride
- Weaker performance in cold temperatures
Summarised by AI from 15 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 18 N Fera Sport SU2 reviewsI've driven the tire's about 40 000km on my family diesel wagon.The final result is four summers and they're gone.The protector is about 4mm,the outer side of the tires is melted like slick tire,and pieces of rubber come off.After a little bump one of the tires got a puncture in the side board,which surprised me a little,but for the price everything is OK.The grip is very good in wet and dry,they perform good in dynamic driving...when they new :)
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 106 sizes of the Ventus Evo and 138 of the N Fera Sport SU2, 75 of them made in both.
| Category | Ventus Evo | N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 106 sizes, 17 to 22 inch | 138 sizes, 16 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 75 sizes 205/45 R17205/55 R17215/45 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17225/60 R17205/40 R18215/40 R18215/45 R18225/40 R18225/45 R18and 63 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A97%B3% | A64%B34%C2% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C83%A10%B7%D1% | C36%A26%D25%B13% |
| EU label noise | 68-73 dB B76%A24% | 68-75 dB B80%A20% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 0 of 184 | 2 of 266 |
| Replaced | Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 (2021) | Nexen N Fera SU1 (2012) |
| Awards | Winner: Performance Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2026/27) Winner: Performance Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2025) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Ventus Evo was the dearer tire in 2 of the 2 tests that listed prices, by 12.8% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Hankook's Ventus Evo and Nexen's N'Fera Sport SU2 target a very similar buyer: someone shopping for a fast summer road tire with credible wet safety and enough refinement for daily use. On paper they sit in the same modern “sport” bracket (max-performance vs ultra-high-performance), but across five shared tests they separate into two distinct personalities: the Hankook as the more complete performance tire, and the Nexen as the value-led option that feels better than its price suggests.
What makes this comparison interesting is the consistency of the hard safety metrics versus the variability of subjective feel. The Ventus Evo dominates braking-especially in the wet-while the SU2 repeatedly scores well for noise/comfort and can feel more agreeable in certain subjective handling measures. One outlier test (AutoView 225/45 R18) flips the script on handling feel for Hankook, highlighting how fitment/size and vehicle pairing can change impressions even when core stopping performance remains strong.
Conclusion
Across the shared data, the Hankook Ventus Evo is the clear performance-and-safety pick. It wins every single dry braking result and every wet braking result (5/5 in both), often by meaningful margins-most notably in Auto Bild 2025 wet braking where it stops in 42.7 m versus the Nexen's 48.3 m (a large real-world gap). It also tends to carry higher objective handling speeds (dry handling 120.9 vs 114.7 km/h in Auto Bild 2025; wet handling 83.6 vs 82.0 km/h in Auto Bild 2026), and it backs that up with stronger wear/value math in the tests that measured it (e.g., 56,310 km vs 47,810 km estimated wear in Auto Bild 2026, plus better €/1000 km value).
The Nexen N'Fera Sport SU2 earns its place by being the more comfort/quietness-tilted and budget-friendly entry that doesn't behave like a “cheap” tire in normal driving. It's frequently quieter (wins noise in 3 tests) and is repeatedly described as stable and cohesive, albeit with a slightly delayed turn-in. Where it gives ground is in the most important weighted areas in several tests-braking and, at times, precision at the limit-so while it's a sensible step-up sports tire for cost-conscious drivers, it's not the best choice if your priority is maximum emergency-stop performance or top-tier all-round capability.
Practical takeaway: if you want the tire that most consistently converts grip into shorter stopping distances and higher lap/track-type metrics while still offering strong wear/value, pick the Ventus Evo; if you're prioritizing a quieter, decent-handling summer tire at a lower buy-in and can accept middling-to-back-of-pack braking in certain group tests, the SU2 is the rational value play.
Ventus Evo vs N Fera Sport SU2: your questions
Is the Hankook Ventus Evo or the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 the better tire?
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Ventus Evo finished ahead 4 times and the N Fera Sport SU2 once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ventus Evo scores 9.4 and the N Fera Sport SU2 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Ventus Evo or the N Fera Sport SU2?
The Ventus Evo led 13 of the 14 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.3% shorter in the wet across 5 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Ventus Evo led 8 of the 10 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.5% shorter in the dry across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Ventus Evo lasted 18.5% longer in the wear tests (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.8/10 for the Ventus Evo and 5.6/10 for the N Fera Sport SU2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The N Fera Sport SU2 was 0.9 dB quieter (3 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.9/10 for the Ventus Evo and 6.4/10 for the N Fera Sport SU2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the N Fera Sport SU2 70% from 18. 78% of Ventus Evo owners would buy it again, against 38% for the N Fera Sport SU2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Ventus Evo was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 12.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Ventus Evo is made in 106 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the N Fera Sport SU2 in 138 (16 to 22 inch). 75 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Ventus Evo is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the N Fera Sport SU2 A and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
6-2 in 8 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
8-1 in 9 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
2-3 in 6 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-0 in 2 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion