Linglong Sport Master 4S vs Vredestein Quatrac
- TR Score
- 8.7/10
- Owners say
- -
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 30
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 2 times and the Sport Master 4S not once. The Sport Master 4S stopped 7% shorter in the dry; the Quatrac stopped 7.6% shorter in the wet.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Vredestein Quatrac for true year-round security, especially in rainy or snowy regions. Choose Linglong Sport Master 4S if you drive mainly in mild, dry climates and want strong dry stopping and lower upfront cost.
Where the Sport Master 4S is stronger
- Excellent dry braking (wins both tests)
- Competitive dry handling in 18-inch size
- Lower purchase price / strong value score
Where the Quatrac is stronger
- Class-leading wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
- Superior snow braking, traction, and handling
- Quieter and lower rolling resistance
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Sport Master 4S vs Quatrac at a glance
| Category | Sport Master 4S | Gap | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won2 shared tests | 0 | 2 | |
| Dry4 measurements | 3 | The Sport Master 4S stopped 7% shorter in the dry (2 tests) | 1 |
| Wet10 measurements | 0 | The Quatrac stopped 7.6% shorter in the wet (2 tests) | 10 |
| Snow8 measurements | 1 | The Quatrac stopped 14.6% shorter on snow (2 tests) | 7 |
| Comfort3 measurements | 0 | The Quatrac was 2.1 dB quieter (2 tests) | 2 |
| Value4 measurements | 1 | The Quatrac had 6.7% lower rolling resistance (2 tests) | 3 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.7/10 | The Quatrac by 0.8 | 9.5/10 |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Quatrac was dearer in 2 of 2 | +32.2% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 60 | 23 sizes made in both | 39 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Sport Master 4S | Field | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tire Test | P10 of 11 | P1 of 11 | |
| 2025 AutoBild All Season Tire Test | P14 of 15 | P4 of 15 |
Performance profile
12 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Sport Master 4S
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Sport Master 4S
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Sport Master 4S | Gap | Quatrac | Wins | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 123 | 7% | 133 | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 60.1 | 0.6% | 59.7 | 1-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 181 | 7.6% | 167 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 46.4 | 6.5% | 49.4 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 14.29 | 1.5% | 14.07 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 44.1 | 8.6% | 47.9 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 8.2 | 18.7% | 9.8 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 92 | 14.6% | 78 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 635 | 10% | 699 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 45.5 | 5.7% | 48.1 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 11 | 8.7% | 11.9 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 13.4 | 7.3% | 12.5 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 72.95 | 2.1 dB | 70.85 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 27,620 | 3.1% | 28,490 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 8.81 | 6.7% | 8.21 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 1,041 | 20.6% | 1,311 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Sport Master 4S scores 8.7 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
| Sport Master 4S | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93 | Dry | 79 | ||
| 67 | Wet | 96 | ||
| 52 | Comfort | 59 | ||
| 28 | Value | 55 | ||
| 26 | Snow | 66 | ||
| - | Ice | 93 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Sport Master 4S | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Dry Grip | 8.2 | ||
| - | Wet Grip | 8.6 | ||
| - | Road Feedback | 7.2 | ||
| - | Handling | 8.1 | ||
| - | Wear | 8.7 | ||
| - | Comfort | 7.9 | ||
| - | Snow Grip | 8.3 | ||
| - | Ice Grip | 7.2 | ||
Owners rate the Quatrac 81% from 30 reviews; the Sport Master 4S has no owner reviews yet. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Linglong Sport Master 4S
No owner reviews yet. Be the first to review it →
Vredestein Quatrac
- 81%from 30 reviews
- 86%would buy again
- 345,646 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Vredestein Quatrac is a strong all-season tire, most often praised for excellent wet-road grip and confident performance in cold conditions, including light-to-moderate snow and ice. Many reviewers highlight strong longevity (often projecting 60-80k km) along with good comfort and generally low noise, making it a solid value alternative to pricier rivals. A minority note higher cabin noise on certain vehicles and slightly less sharp/softer dry handling (especially in hotter temperatures) compared with more summer-focused tires.
- Excellent wet grip and confident wet braking
- Strong cold-weather performance (snow/ice capable for an all-season)
- Good longevity/treadwear and even wear reported by many
- Comfortable ride quality
- Can be noisier for some vehicles/sizes (noted by a minority)
- Dry handling/steering feel not as sporty or can feel softer in heat versus summer-oriented tires
Summarised by AI from 28 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 30 Quatrac reviewsFinally retired these at 55k miles. They were real good over all. Average: price and comfort. Above average: off road, snow and ice grip. Way above average: wet and dry grip. The wear was good too, if my alignment didn't go out I could've gotten about 62k out of these.
These tires went through hell and back. I took my car off road several times with these, they went through several snow storms including a couple blizzards. They never once let me down. I once got mired about 4" deep in muddy sand and was able to get out (fwd civic).
I ended up buying a new set of these. Very satisfied overall, I doubt there's another tire that has such good performance across the board without being costly. My new set was around mid $700s in total including mount, balance and disposal.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 60 sizes of the Sport Master 4S and 39 of the Quatrac, 23 of them made in both.
| Category | Sport Master 4S | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 60 sizes, 13 to 19 inch | 39 sizes, 15 to 18 inch |
| Made in both | 23 sizes 165/65 R15175/65 R15185/55 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15195/50 R15195/55 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15205/65 R15195/45 R16195/55 R16and 11 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B82%C18% | B100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C52%D48% | C69%D19%B8%A2%E2% |
| EU label noise | 68-72 dB A85%B15% | 70-72 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 112 of 112 | 106 of 106 |
| On the market since | - | 2020 |
| Replaced | Linglong Grip Master 4S (2022) | Vredestein Quatrac 5 (2014) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Quatrac was the dearer tire in 2 of the 2 tests that listed prices, by 32.2% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits the budget-oriented Linglong Sport Master 4S against the premium-touring Vredestein Quatrac-two all-season options aimed at very different buyers. Across two 2025 AutoBild tests (SUV 215/55 R17 and UHP 225/40 R18), the Quatrac topped the field overall twice, while the Linglong finished mid-to-lower pack but showed standout stopping power on dry roads.
The pattern is clear: Linglong delivers surprisingly short dry braking and solid value, whereas Vredestein dominates in wet grip, aquaplaning resistance, and winter capability. If your daily driving sees frequent rain or occasional snow, the Quatrac's safety margins are hard to ignore; if you drive in mild climates and want maximum dry bite for less money, the Linglong has niche appeal.
Conclusion
Vredestein Quatrac is the more complete all-season tire, winning both shared tests and leading convincingly in wet braking (≈7-8% shorter), wet handling (+5-7%), aquaplaning (+9-19%), and all key snow metrics (≈6-15% advantages). It's also quieter and more efficient, with slightly better wear in the 18-inch test-exactly the traits that build year-round confidence.
Linglong Sport Master 4S counters with best-in-test dry stopping in both sizes (up to ~9% advantage) and lower purchase price, plus strong abrasion results in the 18-inch test. But its snow limitations and higher rolling resistance narrow its viable use case. Choose Quatrac for all-weather safety and balanced manners; pick the Linglong if you prioritize short dry stops and upfront savings in a warm, mostly dry climate.
Sport Master 4S vs Quatrac: your questions
Is the Linglong Sport Master 4S or the Vredestein Quatrac the better tire?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 2 times and the Sport Master 4S not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Sport Master 4S scores 8.7 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Sport Master 4S or the Quatrac?
The Quatrac led 10 of the 10 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7.6% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Sport Master 4S led 3 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Quatrac led 7 of the 8 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 14.6% shorter on snow across 2 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Quatrac had 6.7% lower rolling resistance (2 tests).
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Quatrac was 2.1 dB quieter (2 tests).
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Quatrac 81% from 30 reviews; the Sport Master 4S has no owner reviews yet.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Quatrac was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 32.2% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Sport Master 4S is made in 60 sizes (13 to 19 inch) and the Quatrac in 39 (15 to 18 inch). 23 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Sport Master 4S is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
3-12 in 16 shared tests
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Linglong Sport Master 4S
4-0 in 4 shared tests
vs
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Vredestein Quatrac
6-5 in 11 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion