In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 to find out which tire is best for your own driving.
There are a few basic differences between the two tires. The Bridgestone Potenza Sport is an Max-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is an Ultra-High-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tires directly!
Out of these four tests:
While it might look like the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is better than the Kumho Ecsta PS71 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 2.98% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test 255/35 R19 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:35.4M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 36.58M |
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:32.6M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 34.2M |
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:34.9M | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 34.8M |
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:32.6M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 34.1M |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 2.91% faster around a lap than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test 255/35 R19 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:52.37s | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 53.94s |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 1.66% faster around a lap than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:120.6Km/H | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 118.6Km/H |
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 2.35% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test 255/35 R19 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:53.41M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 56.18M |
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:27.6M | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 27.4M |
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:28.8M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 30.2M |
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:43.1M | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 42.8M |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 3.89% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:34.6M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 36M |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 5.64% faster around a wet lap than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test 255/35 R19 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:88.57s | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 93.86s |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was 0.41% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:73.5Km/H | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 73.8Km/H |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 1.22% faster around a wet circle than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:14.55s | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 14.73s |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 floated at a 4% higher speed than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Straight Aqua: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test 255/35 R19 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:86.87Km/H | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 90.07Km/H |
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:78.9Km/H | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 83.7Km/H |
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:79.1Km/H | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 81.3Km/H |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 slipped out at a 3.68% higher speed than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test 255/35 R19 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:2.51m/sec2 | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 2.89m/sec2 |
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:3.1m/sec2 | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 3m/sec2 |
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:3.04m/sec2 | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 3.09m/sec2 |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 scored 8.89% more points than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test 255/35 R19 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:8 Points | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 8.8 Points |
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:4.3 Points | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 4.7 Points |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two noise tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport measured 0.44% quieter than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Noise: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test 255/35 R19 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:74.4dB | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 74.8dB |
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:73.8dB | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 73.6dB |
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:74.6dB | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 75.4dB |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two wear tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is predicted to cover 17.53% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wear: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:50500KM | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 37300KM |
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:45880KM | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 42180KM |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one value tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport proved to have a 3.13% better value based on price/1000km than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Value: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:9.58Price/1000 | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 11.05Price/1000 |
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:8.37Price/1000 | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 7.49Price/1000 |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 had a 5.42% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test 255/35 R19 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:10.29kg / t | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 9.285kg / t |
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:9.24kg / t | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 9.19kg / t |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 used 1.72% less fuel than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport:5.8l/100km | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 5.7l/100km |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport emitted 25.55% less particle wear matter than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Abrasion: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Bridgestone Potenza Sport:63.8mg/km/t | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 85.7mg/km/t |
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and Kumho Ecsta PS71.
In total the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has been reviewed 112 times and drivers have given the tire 81% overall.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 has been reviewed 76 times and drivers have given the tire 78% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
In conclusion the Bridgestone Potenza Sport performed better in dry braking, dry handling [s], dry handling [km/h], wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [s], wet circle, noise, wear, value and abrasion, while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 performed better in wet handling [km/h], straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, subj. comfort, rolling resistance and fuel consumption.
Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Bridgestone Potenza Sport seems to be the best tire overall.
However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.
Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.