Toyo Proxes Sport 2 vs Nokian Powerproof 2
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Nokian Powerproof 2 finished ahead 2 times and the Proxes Sport 2 not once. The Proxes Sport 2 was stronger in comfort, the Powerproof 2 in wet and value.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Proxes Sport 2
Powerproof 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Proxes Sport 2
Powerproof 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | Proxes Sport 2 | Gap | Powerproof 2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 114 | 0.6% | 113 | 0-2 |
| Dry Handling mph | 62.6 | 0.6% | 62.2 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 8.7% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Powerproof 2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 124 | 4.7% | 118 | 0-2 |
| Wet Handling mph | 50.8 | 0.1% | 50.8 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 21.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 15.29 | 2.6% | 14.9 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 59 | 5.8% | 55.7 | 1-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 11.5 | 13.2% | 10.2 | 1-0 |
| Comfort Proxes Sport 2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Noise dB | 71.3 | 0.4 dB | 71.7 | 1-0 |
| Value Powerproof 2 ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 23,873 | 30.3% | 31,118 | 0-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.61 | 13.1% | 7.48 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion g | 1,734 | 20.1% | 1,386 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Proxes Sport 2 | Field | Powerproof 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test | P17 of 20 | P11 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P16 of 50 | P10 of 50 |
Proxes Sport 2 vs Powerproof 2: your questions
Is the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 or the Nokian Powerproof 2 the better tire?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Nokian Powerproof 2 finished ahead 2 times and the Proxes Sport 2 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Proxes Sport 2 scores 9.1 and the Powerproof 2 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Proxes Sport 2 or the Powerproof 2?
The Powerproof 2 led 4 of the 7 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.7% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 2-2 between the Proxes Sport 2 and the Powerproof 2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the Proxes Sport 2 and 9/10 for the Powerproof 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9 reviews and the Powerproof 2 95% from 1.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Proxes Sport 2 is made in 113 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the Powerproof 2 in 77 (16 to 21 inch). 58 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Proxes Sport 2 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Powerproof 2 A and B.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
3-0 in 3 shared tests
vs
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
2-0 in 3 shared tests
vs
Falken Azenis FK520 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
5-2 in 8 shared tests
vs
Linglong Sport Master vs Nokian Powerproof 2
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Toyo Proxes Sport 2 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
3-3 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.