Falken Azenis FK520 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
- TR Score
- 9.1/10
- Owners say
- 82% · 55
- TR Score
- 9.1/10
- Owners say
- 92% · 9
In the 8 independent tests that ran both tires, the Falken Azenis FK520 finished ahead 5 times and the Proxes Sport 2 twice, with one level. The Azenis FK520 lasted 33.3% longer in the wear tests; the Proxes Sport 2 held 3.2% more grip in curved aquaplaning.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Falken Azenis FK520 if you want the better ownership proposition (much longer wear, better value, usually lower rolling resistance) with generally strong braking-ideal for high-mileage road driving. Choose the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 if your priority is sharper, more athletic handling and stronger aquaplaning reserves, and you're willing to accept materially shorter tread life and a higher cost-per-kilometer.
Where the Azenis FK520 is stronger
- Strong braking performance with several standout results (e.g., SUV 2026: 32.5 m dry and 51.3 m wet vs Toyo's 34.6 m and 55.4 m)
- Clearly superior wear/longevity across tests (typically +28-37% more projected mileage, e.g., 52,080 km vs 38,420 km in AutoBild 2026)
- Better value metrics and usually lower purchase/operating cost (e.g., AutoBild 2026 value: 12.86 vs 16.4; ADAC 2025 value: 9.42 vs 12.11)
Where the Proxes Sport 2 is stronger
- Stronger dry handling pace and more confident subjective steering/turn-in (e.g., AutoBild 2026 subjective dry: 8.7 vs 5.3; SUV 2026 dry handling: 104.9 vs 102.4 km/h)
- Better wet handling trend (category wins: 5-0 across shared summaries), usually feeling more composed at the limit
- Often superior aquaplaning reserves, especially in straight and curved aquaplaning in key tests (SUV 2026: +5.3% straight, +17.4% curved)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Azenis FK520 vs Proxes Sport 2 at a glance
| Category | Azenis FK520 | Gap | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won8 shared tests | 5 | 1 level | 2 |
| Dry14 measurements | 4 | The Proxes Sport 2 averaged a 1.1% higher speed on the dry handling course (4 tests) | 10 |
| Wet30 measurements | 12 | The Proxes Sport 2 held 3.2% more grip in curved aquaplaning (5 tests) | 17 |
| Off road4 measurements | 3 | 1 | |
| Comfort8 measurements | 4 | 2 | |
| Value13 measurements | 11 | The Azenis FK520 lasted 33.3% longer in the wear tests (4 tests) | 1 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.1/10 | Level | 9.1/10 |
| Owner rating55 and 9 reviews | 82% | The Proxes Sport 2 by 10 points | 92% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 76% | The Proxes Sport 2 by 24 points | 100% |
| Pricein the 6 tests that listed prices | Level | Level | |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 133 | 97 sizes made in both | 113 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 8 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Azenis FK520 | Field | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Summer SUV Tire Test | P8 of 9 | P6 of 9 | |
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test | P13 of 20 | P17 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P14 of 50 | P16 of 50 | |
| 2025 AZ Summer Tire Test | P8 of 10 | P7 of 10 | |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P8 of 18 | P11 of 18 | |
| 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test | P8 of 20 | P14 of 20 | |
| 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tire Test | P7 of 13 | P7 of 13 | |
| 2023 Summer Tire Market Overview | P8 of 50 | P10 of 50 |
Performance profile
11 measurements from the 8 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Azenis FK520
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 13 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Azenis FK520
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Azenis FK520
Not ahead in any category
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Azenis FK520 82% from 55 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Azenis FK520 | Gap | Proxes Sport 2 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 113 | = | 113 | 3-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69.4 | 1% | 68.7 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 67.5 | 1.1% | 68.1 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 64.2% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 129 | 2% | 131 | 4-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 124 | 0.3% | 124 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 74 | 1.6% | 72.8 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50.4 | 0.7% | 50.8 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 21.7% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.62 | 0.2% | 14.61 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 53.1 | 1.3% | 53.9 | 3-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.5 | 3.2% | 9.8 | 2-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 39.3 | 0.6% | 39 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,233 | 4.5% | 2,335 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,410 | 26.3% | 1,908 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 598 | 5.7% | 565 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 7.1% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.6 | 0.3 dB | 70.87 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28,518 | 33.3% | 21,409 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.23 | 4.2% | 8.59 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.6 | = | 5.6 | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 61.9 | 27.9% | 85.9 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,305 | 24.7% | 1,734 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0.1 | 20.3% | 0.12 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Azenis FK520 scores 9.1 and the Proxes Sport 2 9.1 out of 10.
| Azenis FK520 | Category | Proxes Sport 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 | Dry | 92 | ||
| 83 | Wet | 81 | ||
| 57 | Comfort | 48 | ||
| 54 | Value | 14 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Azenis FK520 | Category | Proxes Sport 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | Dry Grip | 9.4 | ||
| 8.3 | Wet Grip | 9.3 | ||
| 7.9 | Road Feedback | 9 | ||
| 8.4 | Handling | 9.4 | ||
| 7.7 | Wear | 8.8 | ||
| 8.1 | Comfort | 8.5 | ||
Owners rate the Azenis FK520 82% from 55 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Falken Azenis FK520
- 82%from 55 reviews
- 76%would buy again
- 403,489 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners generally rate the Falken Azenis FK520 highly (average 79.6%), most often praising its strong dry grip and capable wet grip for the money. Comfort and refinement also come through well, with many describing it as quiet and compliant for a UHP-style tire, and around one in five explicitly calling it great value. The main recurring drawbacks are mixed steering feel (some find it sharp, others a bit numb) and a smaller but notable group reporting vibration/balance issues; wet handling is also more divided than outright wet grip.
- Strong dry grip, comparable to premium brands
- Reassuring wet grip
- Comfortable ride despite sporty intent
- Low road noise on motorway speeds
- Occasional vibration or balancing issues at speed
- Steering feel can be a bit numb or lacking feedback
- Wet handling feels less confidence-inspiring for some
Summarised by AI from 49 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 55 Azenis FK520 reviewsFalken Azenis fk520 have been a great tire, noise level is not intrusive and they give a good return on fuel economy. These tires are very progressive and give good feed back. Having watched a back to back comparison with the Michelin PS4, the Falkens are punching way above their price range. If you want near PS4 performance at kumho prices, you won't go far wrong...will definitely try out the latest incarnation, Falken azenis R820 when the fk520's are done.
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
- 92%from 9 reviews
- 100%would buy again
- 88,100 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 delivers standout performance for the price, with consistently strong dry and wet grip, high confidence at speed, and sharp, predictable handling/steering response. Many comparisons against premium competitors (Michelin/Goodyear/Continental/Bridgestone) describe the Toyo as matching or exceeding them in real-world traction and stability while offering excellent value. Wear/longevity feedback is generally very positive where reported, with several users noting robust tread life. A smaller number of drivers mention trade-offs such as limited rim-protection and a sport-tire firmness (and occasional noise) depending on vehicle setup.
- Strong dry grip and traction
- Excellent wet grip and confidence in the rain
- Sharp handling, steering response, and stability at speed
- Predictable behavior under hard braking/cornering
Summarised by AI from 9 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 9 Proxes Sport 2 reviewsI have had these tires on my Audi TT 2.0 TFSI Quattro for a year and a half now and coming from an avid PS4S user I must say I'm shocked at how good these are for the money! They were about £70 per corner cheaper than the PS4S' for the TT in 255/35/19 so initially I was sceptical but I am amazing at the handling, dry AND wet grip they provide and the longevity of the tires! I have covered a good mix of country roads, motorways and long trips across Europe in the year and a half I have had these on and they have never missed a beat! I'm so confident in the wet, even when driving very "spiritedly"! Granted they aren't as comfortable as a BluEarth GT AE51 for example but the car is lowered on coil overs so its not all the tires fault. 10/10 would defiantly purchase again and recommend to others.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 133 sizes of the Azenis FK520 and 113 of the Proxes Sport 2, 97 of them made in both.
| Category | Azenis FK520 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 133 sizes, 17 to 22 inch | 113 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 97 sizes 205/45 R17205/50 R17215/45 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17235/45 R17235/55 R17235/65 R17245/40 R17245/45 R17225/35 R18and 85 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A95%B5% | A100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C68%A12%B12%D8% | C72%D28% |
| EU label noise | 68-72 dB B51%A49% | 71-72 dB B80%A20% |
| Replaced | Falken Azenis FK510 (2016) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | Within 1% of each other on average across the 6 tests that listed prices. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Falken's Azenis FK520 and Toyo's Proxes Sport 2 sit in the same modern summer performance space, but they go about “fast road” capability in noticeably different ways. Across eight shared professional tests (from 18" UHP sizes up to 19" SUV fitments), the data repeatedly shows a split between measurable efficiency/value on the Falken side and sharper dynamic performance-especially handling feel and aquaplaning headroom-on the Toyo side.
The interesting part is that neither tire is a simple “dry vs wet” cliché. The FK520 often produces very strong braking numbers (including standout wet braking in several tests) and consistently dominates longevity, rolling resistance and cost-per-km metrics. The Proxes Sport 2, meanwhile, tends to look best when the question is outright pace and stability at the limit-dry handling speed, subjective steering confidence, and aquaplaning reserves-yet it repeatedly gives back ground on wear and ownership cost.
Conclusion
Pattern-wise, the Falken Azenis FK520 is the smarter all-round purchase if you care about day-to-day running costs and braking security. It repeatedly leads projected mileage (e.g., 52,080 km vs 38,420 km in the 2026 AutoBild test; 46,700 km vs 36,600 km in ADAC; 40,000 km vs 30,000 km in AZ) and it's usually the better value-per-distance. It also frequently posts lower rolling resistance (e.g., 7.35 vs 8.25 kg/t in the 2026 SUV test; 7.71 vs 8.61 kg/t in AutoBild 2026), which is a real-world benefit for energy use. The trade-off is consistency and precision in dynamic driving: multiple reports flag vague or delayed steering response and weaker side guidance, which can reduce confidence even when pure braking distances look strong.
The Toyo Proxes Sport 2 is the pick for drivers prioritizing handling sharpness and aquaplaning confidence over total cost of ownership. It is regularly faster in dry handling (e.g., 104.9 vs 102.4 km/h in the 2026 SUV test; 100.7 vs 98.5 km/h in AutoBild 2026; quickest in AZ 2025) and often leads subjective dry handling by a wide margin (AutoBild 2026: 8.7 vs 5.3 points). It also tends to post stronger aquaplaning reserves (SUV 2026: 89.9 vs 85.4 km/h straight aquaplaning and 2.56 vs 2.18 m/s² curved). The consistent “gotcha” is wear and therefore value: it repeatedly sits near the bottom for projected mileage, which makes it harder to justify unless you specifically want its more athletic character.
Practical takeaway: if you want the more economical, longer-lasting tire with strong braking and efficiency, the FK520 is usually the better buy; if you want the more responsive, higher-limit feel (especially in standing water/aquaplaning scenarios), the Proxes Sport 2 is the more rewarding driver's tire-just expect to pay for it in tread life.
Azenis FK520 vs Proxes Sport 2: your questions
Is the Falken Azenis FK520 or the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 the better tire?
In the 8 independent tests that ran both tires, the Falken Azenis FK520 finished ahead 5 times and the Proxes Sport 2 twice, with one level. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Azenis FK520 scores 9.1 and the Proxes Sport 2 9.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Azenis FK520 or the Proxes Sport 2?
The Proxes Sport 2 led 17 of the 30 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 3.2% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 5 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Proxes Sport 2 led 10 of the 14 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it averaged a 1.1% higher speed on the dry handling course across 4 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Azenis FK520 lasted 33.3% longer in the wear tests (4 tests) and had 4.2% lower rolling resistance (5 tests). Owners rate wear 7.7/10 for the Azenis FK520 and 8.8/10 for the Proxes Sport 2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.1/10 for the Azenis FK520 and 8.5/10 for the Proxes Sport 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Azenis FK520 82% from 55 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. 76% of Azenis FK520 owners would buy it again, against 100% for the Proxes Sport 2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 6 tests that listed prices, the two were priced within 1% of each other on average.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Azenis FK520 is made in 133 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the Proxes Sport 2 in 113 (17 to 22 inch). 97 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Azenis FK520 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Proxes Sport 2 A and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Falken Azenis FK520 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
0-14 in 14 shared tests
vs 
Falken Azenis FK520 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
1-8 in 9 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Falken Azenis FK520 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
0-4 in 4 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Falken Azenis FK520
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Falken Azenis FK520
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
3-0 in 3 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion