Falken Azenis FK520 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
The interesting part is that neither tire is a simple “dry vs wet” cliché. The FK520 often produces very strong braking numbers (including standout wet braking in several tests) and consistently dominates longevity, rolling resistance and cost-per-km metrics. The Proxes Sport 2, meanwhile, tends to look best when the question is outright pace and stability at the limit-dry handling speed, subjective steering confidence, and aquaplaning reserves-yet it repeatedly gives back ground on wear and ownership cost.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been eight tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Falken Azenis FK520 | five | |
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 | two | |
| one draws in one tests | ||
While it might look like the Falken Azenis FK520 is better than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Strong braking performance with several standout results (e.g., SUV 2026: 32.5 m dry and 51.3 m wet vs Toyo's 34.6 m and 55.4 m)
- Clearly superior wear/longevity across tests (typically +28-37% more projected mileage, e.g., 52,080 km vs 38,420 km in AutoBild 2026)
- Better value metrics and usually lower purchase/operating cost (e.g., AutoBild 2026 value: 12.86 vs 16.4; ADAC 2025 value: 9.42 vs 12.11)
- Lower rolling resistance in most shared tests (notably SUV 2026 and AutoBild 2026), supporting efficiency
- Stronger dry handling pace and more confident subjective steering/turn-in (e.g., AutoBild 2026 subjective dry: 8.7 vs 5.3; SUV 2026 dry handling: 104.9 vs 102.4 km/h)
- Better wet handling trend (category wins: 5-0 across shared summaries), usually feeling more composed at the limit
- Often superior aquaplaning reserves, especially in straight and curved aquaplaning in key tests (SUV 2026: +5.3% straight, +17.4% curved)
- Competitive dry braking in most 18-19" performance tests (frequently edging the Falken by ~1-2%)
Dry Braking
Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.03% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Dry Braking: Toyo Proxes Sport 2
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was 1.01% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Toyo Proxes Sport 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was 0.98% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Toyo Proxes Sport 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 scored 39.08% more points than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Toyo Proxes Sport 2
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 stopped the vehicle in 2.15% less distance than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Wet Braking: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 stopped the vehicle in 0.26% less distance than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was 1.62% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Toyo Proxes Sport 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during four wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was 0.67% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Toyo Proxes Sport 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 scored 17.81% more points than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was 0.07% faster around a wet circle than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Circle: Toyo Proxes Sport 2
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 floated at a 1.41% higher speed than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Straight Aqua: Toyo Proxes Sport 2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 slipped out at a 2.68% higher speed than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Toyo Proxes Sport 2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Gravel Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one gravel handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 0.63% faster around a lap than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Gravel Handling [Km/H]: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Gravel Handling winner was calculated >>
Gravel Traction
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during one gravel traction tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 had 4.35% better traction on gravel than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Gravel Traction: Toyo Proxes Sport 2
See how the Gravel Traction winner was calculated >>
Sand Traction
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one sand traction tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 had 20.82% better traction in sand than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Sand Traction: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Sand Traction winner was calculated >>
Grass Traction
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one grass traction tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 had 5.42% better traction on grass than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Grass Traction: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Grass Traction winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 scored 6.54% more points than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during three noise tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 measured 0.38% quieter than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Noise: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during four wear tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 is predicted to cover 24.93% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Wear: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during four value tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 proved to have a 25.08% better value based on price/1000km than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Value: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during two price tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 cost 4.84% less than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Price: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 had a 4.19% lower rolling resistance than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 and Toyo Proxes Sport 2 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 lost 24.74% less particle wear matter than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
Best In Abrasion: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Falken Azenis FK520 Driver Reviews
Drivers report the Falken Azenis FK520 delivers excellent dry grip, very strong wet braking/traction, and predictable, progressive handling, while remaining comfortable and relatively quiet. Value for money is a standout, with several users comparing its performance favorably to premium brands, and wear generally viewed as good for a UHP tire. A minority note that steering precision/feedback isn't as sharp as top-tier UUHP options, and it's not the best choice for track days or prolonged hard driving due to some heat fade. Overall sentiment is strongly positive given the performance-to-price ratio.
Based on 38 reviews with an average rating of 83%
Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Driver Reviews
Drivers overwhelmingly praise the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 for outstanding dry and wet grip, sharp steering response, and confidence-inspiring, predictable handling even at high speeds. Many note strong value for money versus premium rivals, with several reporting good ride comfort for a sport tire and promising wear. Aquaplaning resistance and braking performance receive consistent compliments. A recurring minor downside is the lack of rim protection.
Based on 8 reviews with an average rating of 92%
It is simply a better tire in absolutely every single way. I drive like a ****, and these tires just give so much confidence. I can brake stupidly quick in both dry and mildly wet conditions, even through the corners. They hook up so well and are incredibly predictable - they really bite the road and mitigate so much understeer in my 2006 Leon FR.
When there’s a more significant layer of water on the road they don’t... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Toyo Proxes Sport 2 is the pick for drivers prioritizing handling sharpness and aquaplaning confidence over total cost of ownership. It is regularly faster in dry handling (e.g., 104.9 vs 102.4 km/h in the 2026 SUV test; 100.7 vs 98.5 km/h in AutoBild 2026; quickest in AZ 2025) and often leads subjective dry handling by a wide margin (AutoBild 2026: 8.7 vs 5.3 points). It also tends to post stronger aquaplaning reserves (SUV 2026: 89.9 vs 85.4 km/h straight aquaplaning and 2.56 vs 2.18 m/s² curved). The consistent “gotcha” is wear and therefore value: it repeatedly sits near the bottom for projected mileage, which makes it harder to justify unless you specifically want its more athletic character.
Practical takeaway: if you want the more economical, longer-lasting tire with strong braking and efficiency, the FK520 is usually the better buy; if you want the more responsive, higher-limit feel (especially in standing water/aquaplaning scenarios), the Proxes Sport 2 is the more rewarding driver's tire-just expect to pay for it in tread life.
Key Differences
- Longevity/value: FK520 consistently lasts much longer (e.g., 52,080 km vs 38,420 km) and therefore wins cost-per-km/value in every test that reports it, while Proxes Sport 2 is repeatedly penalized for short mileage
- Handling character: Proxes Sport 2 is generally quicker and more confidence-inspiring in dry handling (and wins wet handling across the dataset), whereas FK520 is more often described as vague/delayed in steering response despite acceptable lap-speed in some tests
- Aquaplaning focus: Proxes Sport 2 tends to lead aquaplaning metrics (notably SUV 2026 curved aquaplaning 2.56 vs 2.18 m/s²), while FK520's aquaplaning results are more mixed-sometimes competitive, sometimes behind depending on test
- Braking split by test/condition: FK520 has multiple notable wet-braking wins (e.g., 27.8 vs 29.5 m in the 2026 braking test; 43.4 vs 46.1 m in AutoBild 2026), while Proxes Sport 2 more frequently edges dry braking by small margins (~1-2%) in several tests
- Efficiency: FK520 usually delivers lower rolling resistance (e.g., 7.35 vs 8.25 kg/t in SUV 2026; 7.71 vs 8.61 kg/t in AutoBild 2026), whereas Proxes Sport 2 only occasionally comes out ahead (e.g., AutoBild UHP 2023)
- Use-case versatility: FK520 shows unusual off-tarmac strengths in the SUV test (best-in-test sand traction; also good grass traction), while Proxes Sport 2 is comparatively stronger on high-speed wet stability but weaker on sand and sometimes gravel metrics
Overall Winner: Falken Azenis FK520
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Falken Azenis FK520 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Falken Azenis FK520 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.