Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Ceat SportDrive
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 finished ahead 2 times and the SportDrive once. The Ecsta PS71 was stronger in dry and wet, the SportDrive in comfort and value.
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Ecsta PS71
SportDrive
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Ecsta PS71
SportDrive
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | Ecsta PS71 | Gap | SportDrive | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Ecsta PS71 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 114 | 4.4% | 119 | 3-0 |
| Wet Ecsta PS71 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 92 | 11.6% | 105 | 3-0 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 118 | 14.3% | 138 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 52 | 10.1% | 47.2 | 1-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 9.8 | 3.4% | 9.5 | 1-0 |
| Comfort SportDrive ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 73.6 | 2.1 dB | 71.5 | 0-1 |
| Value SportDrive ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 23,177 | 20.9% | 28,024 | 0-1 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.7 | 3.5% | 5.5 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 85.7 | 6.1% | 80.5 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 3 tests, 2023 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Ecsta PS71 | Field | SportDrive |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P13 of 18 | P12 of 18 | |
| 2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout | P4 of 52 | P28 of 52 | |
| 2023 Summer Tire Market Overview | P12 of 50 | P21 of 50 |
Ecsta PS71 vs SportDrive: your questions
Is the Kumho Ecsta PS71 or the Ceat SportDrive the better tire?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 finished ahead 2 times and the SportDrive once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ecsta PS71 scores 8.5 and the SportDrive 7.9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Ecsta PS71 or the SportDrive?
The Ecsta PS71 led 6 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 11.6% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Ecsta PS71 led 3 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.4% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Ecsta PS71 77% from 94 reviews; the SportDrive has no owner reviews yet.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
4-3 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
3-2 in 5 shared tests
vs
Giti GitiSportS2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
4-0 in 4 shared tests
vs
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
1-2 in 3 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.