Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Michelin Alpin 6
- TR Score
- 8.1/10
- Owners say
- 84% · 36
- TR Score
- 9.1/10
- Owners say
- 85% · 35
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin Alpin 6 finished ahead 12 times and the Krisalp HP3 once. The Krisalp HP3 resisted straight aquaplaning at a 4.5% higher speed; the Alpin 6 lasted 24.5% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Michelin Alpin 6 if you want the most dependable all-round winter tire-especially for wet-road safety and high annual mileage-where its shorter wet braking and clearly better wear justify the higher price. Choose the Kleber Krisalp HP3 if you drive in snowier regions or slushy motorway conditions and want strong snow/aquaplaning performance with a lower upfront cost, accepting that wet braking and overall on-road precision are typically not as strong as the Michelin.
Where the Krisalp HP3 is stronger
- Strong snow performance focus (frequent wins in snow braking/handling; e.g., 25.5 m vs 26.4 m snow braking in Auto Bild 2022)
- Excellent straight-line aquaplaning resistance across multiple tests (e.g., 83.4 vs 78.5 km/h in Auto Bild 2024; 80.5 vs 78.7 km/h in Auto Bild 2022)
- Typically lower purchase price and better price-per-performance metrics (e.g., Auto Bild 2022 price 545 vs 720; better value index in multiple Auto Bild results)
Where the Alpin 6 is stronger
- Consistently shorter wet braking distances (numerous wins; often ~4-9% advantage, e.g., 53.3 vs 58.3 m in Auto Bild 2022)
- Higher overall test placements and broader all-conditions balance (12/13 shared tests higher overall, including multiple podiums and wins)
- Significantly better predicted mileage/wear resistance (e.g., 50,500 vs 41,730 km Auto Bild 2024; 53,300 vs 41,700 km ADAC 2023)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Krisalp HP3 vs Alpin 6 at a glance
| Category | Krisalp HP3 | Gap | Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won13 shared tests | 1 | 12 | |
| Dry12 measurements | 1 | The Alpin 6 stopped 3% shorter in the dry (6 tests) | 10 |
| Wet31 measurements | 10 | The Alpin 6 stopped 5.5% shorter in the wet (10 tests) | 21 |
| Snow23 measurements | 20 | The Krisalp HP3 stopped 3.8% shorter on snow (10 tests) | 3 |
| Ice1 measurement | 0 | 1 | |
| Comfort7 measurements | 4 | The Krisalp HP3 was 0.5 dB quieter (6 tests) | 3 |
| Value12 measurements | 2 | The Alpin 6 lasted 24.5% longer in the wear tests (5 tests) | 8 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.1/10 | The Alpin 6 by 1.0 | 9.1/10 |
| Owner rating36 and 35 reviews | 84% | Too close to call | 85% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 71% | The Alpin 6 by 5 points | 76% |
| Pricein the 5 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Alpin 6 was dearer in 5 of 5 | +23.9% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 75 | 29 sizes made in both | 42 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 13 tests, 2019 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Krisalp HP3 | Field | Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test | P8 of 20 | P5 of 20 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test | P16 of 55 | P5 of 55 | |
| 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test | P10 of 16 | P2 of 16 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test | P11 of 20 | P1 of 20 | |
| 2022 Winter Tire Market Overview | P16 of 56 | P3 of 56 | |
| 2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/60 R16 | P6 of 17 | P3 of 17 | |
| 2022/23 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test | P8 of 9 | P7 of 9 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test | P3 of 20 | P2 of 20 | |
| 2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tire Test | P4 of 18 | P1 of 18 | |
| 2021 Winter Tire Market Overview | P11 of 50 | P12 of 50 | |
| The Best Winter Tires for 2020 | P4 of 19 | P2 of 19 | |
| 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test | P15 of 20 | P3 of 20 | |
| 2019 Winter Tire Test Market Overview | P8 of 53 | P3 of 53 |
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 13 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Krisalp HP3
Alpin 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 12 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Krisalp HP3
Alpin 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Krisalp HP3
Alpin 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36 reviews and the Alpin 6 85% from 35. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Krisalp HP3 | Gap | Alpin 6 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 145 | 3% | 141 | 0-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80.7 | = | 80.7 | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69.5 | 0.7% | 70 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 12.5% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 138 | 5.5% | 131 | 0-10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 133 | 4% | 128 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 102.8 | 2.1% | 100.6 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 44.4 | 2.1% | 45.3 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.9% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.78 | 1.4% | 12.6 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50.7 | 4.5% | 48.5 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | 2.7% | 12.9 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 82 | 3.8% | 85 | 10-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.7 | 7.8% | 5.1 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 454 | 1.4% | 460 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 113.3 | 2% | 115.6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 38.7 | 1.3% | 38.2 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.6% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.5 | 1.9% | 11.3 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72 | 10.6% | 64 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 11.1% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.58 | 0.5 dB | 71.12 | 4-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23,532 | 24.5% | 29,339 | 0-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.72 | 1.7% | 8.57 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.7 | = | 5.7 | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56 | 8.9% | 51 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Krisalp HP3 scores 8.1 and the Alpin 6 9.1 out of 10.
| Krisalp HP3 | Category | Alpin 6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34 | Dry | 68 | ||
| 72 | Wet | 88 | ||
| 55 | Comfort | 56 | ||
| 51 | Value | 67 | ||
| 90 | Snow | 59 | ||
| 20 | Ice | 43 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Krisalp HP3 | Category | Alpin 6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | Dry Grip | 8.9 | ||
| 8.5 | Wet Grip | 9.1 | ||
| 8.2 | Road Feedback | 8.5 | ||
| 8.1 | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| 8.4 | Wear | 8.7 | ||
| 8.8 | Comfort | 9 | ||
| 8.9 | Snow Grip | 8.1 | ||
| 8 | Ice Grip | 7.3 | ||
Owners rate the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36 reviews and the Alpin 6 85% from 35. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Kleber Krisalp HP3
- 84%from 36 reviews
- 71%would buy again
- 459,168 milesdriven by reviewers
Most drivers rate the Kleber Krisalp HP3 highly, praising its strong snow and wet performance, low noise/comfort for a winter tire, and decent wear/value. Dry grip and handling precision are adequate for normal driving but can feel soft with noticeable understeer if pushed; several users report a 'jelly/boat-like' feel. A minority mention noise at certain speeds, vibration/manufacturing issues in specific batches, and weaker performance on ice or slush at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is positive with safety and winter capability as standout strengths.
- snow traction and braking
- wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
- low noise/comfort for a winter tire
- good wear and value
- soft sidewalls/boat-like feel; weak handling precision when pushed
- dry grip/cornering weaker vs summer tires
- ice/slush performance can be limited at higher speeds
Summarised by AI from 26 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 36 Krisalp HP3 reviewsGreat snow and ice grip, much better than any winter tire i had before.
Good durability as well. Dry grip is fine, wet grip not as much and must be kept in mind. Not very noisy for a winter tire either. Would buy again if they are on discount.
Michelin Alpin 6
- 85%from 35 reviews
- 76%would buy again
- 257,110 milesdriven by reviewers
Across 30 reviews, the Michelin Alpin 6 is most often praised for strong dry and especially wet-road grip, high comfort, and generally low noise, with many drivers highlighting excellent longevity and slow wear over multiple seasons. Most users describe it as a confidence-inspiring winter tire for cold, wet, and highway driving. The main recurring complaint is that snow and ice performance can be only average (and for some, notably weak in braking/traction and lateral stability), making it feel better suited to mild winters than frequent deep-snow conditions.
- Strong wet grip and wet-road stability (including aquaplaning resistance)
- Good dry/cold grip and confident roadholding
- High comfort/ride quality
- Long tread life / excellent wear resistance
- Mixed to weak snow/ice performance for a notable share of drivers (traction/braking/lateral stability), better suited to mild-winter conditions
Summarised by AI from 30 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 35 Alpin 6 reviewsAfter 6 years and ~37.000km of use, the tire still looks good, has a usable tread left. From the beginning till now it performance excellent in dry and wet conditions. Yesterday I've covert 300km of motorway in a very strong storm and they felt really good on a tarmac that was soaked.
On the other hand, the tire really disappointed on snow covered roads. We live in the mountains and when the roads are covered with snow, the tire loses traction very easily uphill.
So, the tire is really great if you live in areas that don't see a lot of snow.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 75 sizes of the Krisalp HP3 and 42 of the Alpin 6, 29 of them made in both.
| Category | Krisalp HP3 | Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| Sizes made | 75 sizes, 14 to 20 inch | 42 sizes, 15 to 20 inch |
| Made in both | 29 sizes 185/65 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15205/60 R15195/45 R16195/50 R16195/55 R16195/60 R16205/45 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16215/55 R16and 17 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B90%C10% | B100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | D50%C48%B2% | C74%D26% |
| EU label noise | 68-71 dB A81%B19% | 69 dB A90%B10% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 112 of 112 | 72 of 72 |
| On the market since | 2016 | 2018 |
| Replaced | Kleber Krisalp HP2 (2013) | Michelin Alpin 5 (2014) |
| Awards | - | Winner: Best Winter Tires (DriverReviews, 2024/25) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Alpin 6 was the dearer tire in 5 of the 5 tests that listed prices, by 23.9% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This is a classic “smart value vs proven premium” winter-tire matchup: the Kleber Krisalp HP3 (touring winter) against the Michelin Alpin 6 (premium-touring winter). Across 13 shared professional tests, the Michelin is almost always the higher finisher overall (12 test wins to 1), but the way each tire gets its results is very different-and highly relevant to real-world driving.
Broadly, the Alpin 6 builds its advantage on the surfaces that most often decide everyday winter safety-especially wet braking and overall balance-while also delivering notably higher mileage. The Krisalp HP3 counters with consistently strong snow metrics and standout aquaplaning resistance, and it typically costs meaningfully less, which is why it keeps appearing as a “good value” alternative even when it isn't the outright performance leader.
Conclusion
If you prioritize all-round winter safety on mixed cold/wet roads, the Michelin Alpin 6 is the more complete tire and the more consistent top-tier performer. It repeatedly stops shorter in the wet (e.g., 56.6 m vs 59.1 m in Auto Bild 2024; 53.3 m vs 58.3 m in Auto Bild 2022; 36.4 m vs 38.5 m in ADAC 2023), and it pairs that with strong dry behavior and premium refinement. Just as importantly for total cost of ownership, it also dominates wear/longevity: 50,500 km vs 41,730 km (Auto Bild 2024) and 53,300 km vs 41,700 km (ADAC 2023) are big, repeatable gaps.
The Kleber Krisalp HP3 makes the most sense when your winter includes frequent snow and slush, and when budget matters. It wins snow braking in the shared data (10 wins to 0) and often has better straight-line aquaplaning thresholds (e.g., 83.4 km/h vs 78.5 km/h in Auto Bild 2024; 86.2 vs 81.5 km/h in ADAC 2023). The trade-off is clear: on wet braking-the key “black-ice season” metric-it's repeatedly a step behind, and several reports note less precision/understeer on wet and dry. Practical takeaway: choose Michelin for the best all-round safety and long-life value; choose Kleber if you want strong snow/aquaplaning performance at a lower upfront price and can accept longer wet stops.
Krisalp HP3 vs Alpin 6: your questions
Is the Kleber Krisalp HP3 or the Michelin Alpin 6 the better tire?
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin Alpin 6 finished ahead 12 times and the Krisalp HP3 once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Krisalp HP3 scores 8.1 and the Alpin 6 9.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Krisalp HP3 or the Alpin 6?
The Alpin 6 led 21 of the 31 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.5% shorter in the wet across 10 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Alpin 6 led 10 of the 12 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3% shorter in the dry across 6 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Krisalp HP3 led 20 of the 23 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.8% shorter on snow across 10 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Alpin 6 lasted 24.5% longer in the wear tests (5 tests). Owners rate wear 8.4/10 for the Krisalp HP3 and 8.7/10 for the Alpin 6.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Krisalp HP3 was 0.5 dB quieter (6 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.8/10 for the Krisalp HP3 and 9/10 for the Alpin 6.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36 reviews and the Alpin 6 85% from 35. 71% of Krisalp HP3 owners would buy it again, against 76% for the Alpin 6.
Which is more expensive?
In the 5 tests that listed prices, the Alpin 6 was the dearer tire in 5 of them, by 23.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Krisalp HP3 is made in 75 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the Alpin 6 in 42 (15 to 20 inch). 29 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Krisalp HP3 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Alpin 6 B and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The Alpin 6 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2018, the Krisalp HP3 in 2016. The Krisalp HP3 replaced the Kleber Krisalp HP2. The Alpin 6 replaced the Michelin Alpin 5.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Barum Polaris 6 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
2-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-10 in 15 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin Alpin 6
13-1 in 14 shared tests
vs
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
13-5 in 20 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Alpin 6
15-9 in 24 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion