GT Radial ClimateActive vs Vredestein Quatrac
- TR Score
- 9.1/10
- Owners say
- 87% · 4
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 30
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 4 times and the ClimateActive not once. The ClimateActive had 2.6% lower rolling resistance; the Quatrac lasted 26% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Vredestein Quatrac if you want the most rounded all-season with consistently stronger wet performance and significantly better wear (best for high-mileage drivers, frequent rain, and those wanting one set that “just works”). Choose the GT-Radial ClimateActive if upfront cost and decent all-season capability matter most, you drive fewer miles, and your winters are generally mild-accepting shorter tread life and less consistent top-tier wet performance.
Where the ClimateActive is stronger
- Can be very competitive in aquaplaning in some tests (ADAC 2026 straight: 87.3 vs 86.0 km/h; curved: 3.8 vs 3.6 m/s²)
- Shows pockets of strong winter performance, including ice braking in ADAC 2026 (20.9 m vs 22.3 m) and multiple snow braking/traction wins across tests
- Often lower rolling resistance than the Quatrac (e.g., AutoBild 2024: 7.77 vs 8.10 kg/t; AutoBild 2025: 7.59 vs 7.67 kg/t)
Where the Quatrac is stronger
- Consistently stronger wet braking and wet handling across shared tests (e.g., AutoBild 2025 wet braking: 58.0 vs 62.2 m)
- Higher overall test performance and balance (wins all 4 shared overall comparisons; 1st place in both AutoBild 2024 and 2025)
- Much better tread life and environmental metrics (ADAC 2026: 43,600 vs 35,300 km; AutoBild 2024: 55,140 vs 42,900 km; also lower abrasion in both)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
ClimateActive vs Quatrac at a glance
| Category | ClimateActive | Gap | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won4 shared tests | 0 | 4 | |
| Dry6 measurements | 1 | The Quatrac stopped 0.8% shorter in the dry (4 tests) | 5 |
| Wet15 measurements | 3 | The Quatrac stopped 3% shorter in the wet (4 tests) | 12 |
| Snow10 measurements | 5 | Level between the two. | 5 |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort4 measurements | 1 | The Quatrac was 0.6 dB quieter (3 tests) | 3 |
| Value8 measurements | 2 | The Quatrac lasted 26% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) | 5 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.1/10 | The Quatrac by 0.4 | 9.5/10 |
| Owner rating4 and 30 reviews | 87% | The ClimateActive by 6 points | 81% |
| Pricein the 3 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Quatrac was dearer in 2 of 3 | +16.1% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 88 | 25 sizes made in both | 39 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2024 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | ClimateActive | Field | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC All Season Tire Test - 185/65 R15 | P8 of 16 | P4 of 16 | |
| 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tire Test | P6 of 11 | P1 of 11 | |
| 2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test | P9 of 15 | P1 of 15 | |
| 2024 All Season Tire Market Overview | P8 of 37 | P5 of 37 |
Performance profile
15 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
ClimateActive
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
ClimateActive
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
ClimateActive
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the ClimateActive 87% from 4 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | ClimateActive | Gap | Quatrac | Wins | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 135 | 0.8% | 134 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 57.9 | 0.3% | 58.1 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 173 | 3% | 167 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 134 | 0.2% | 135 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 47.8 | 3.1% | 49.3 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.01 | 1.1% | 13.85 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 48.6 | 1.9% | 49.4 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 10.2 | 3.9% | 10.5 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 64 | 0.8% | 64 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 627 | 1.1% | 637 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 47 | 2.2% | 48.4 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.1 | 2.5% | 12.8 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 69 | 6.3% | 73 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 4.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.93 | 0.6 dB | 71.3 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 24,296 | 26% | 30,677 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.68 | 2.6% | 7.89 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.26 | 0.1% | 5.26 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 75 | 20% | 60 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 871 | 23.2% | 669 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the ClimateActive scores 9.1 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
| ClimateActive | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72 | Dry | 79 | ||
| 81 | Wet | 96 | ||
| 46 | Comfort | 59 | ||
| 30 | Value | 55 | ||
| 72 | Snow | 66 | ||
| 76 | Ice | 93 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| ClimateActive | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.3 | Dry Grip | 8.2 | ||
| 9 | Wet Grip | 8.6 | ||
| 7.3 | Road Feedback | 7.2 | ||
| 7.8 | Handling | 8.1 | ||
| 9 | Wear | 8.7 | ||
| 9.8 | Comfort | 7.9 | ||
| 7.5 | Snow Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 7 | Ice Grip | 7.2 | ||
Owners rate the ClimateActive 87% from 4 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
GT Radial ClimateActive
- 87%from 4 reviews
- 25,500 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the GT Radial ClimateActive delivers strong all-season performance, with confident grip in dry and heavy rain and notably good traction in mud and gravel. Comfort and refinement are frequently praised, and multiple users highlight strong value versus premium alternatives like the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Wear so far appears competitive based on early mileage reports, with only a minority noting slightly vague steering/less road feedback.
- Strong wet and dry grip with confident all-year performance
- Good traction on mud/gravel (useful for fields and rougher surfaces)
- Comfortable ride and generally quiet/refined driving
- Good value for money versus premium competitors
- Steering/handling can feel a bit vague or have reduced road feedback
Summarised by AI from 4 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 4 ClimateActive reviewsI fitted this tire on a new Fiat 600 hybrid, straight at car delivery, replacing the OE summer Goodyear's. I therefore have no benchmark compared to the summer OE's.
Fitted in early December, i had the chance to drive them on dry, wet and also some snow due to latest weather conditions.
the tire was superb in all levels of grip. it is also very quiet and comfortable, despite the 18 inch and (relative) low aspect ratio.
Handling is soft and with delayed response, but i attribute this more to the car overall soft suspensions and chassis settings, rather than the tire itself.
A very good tire at a fantastic price point. And apparently the press agrees with me.
Well done GT!
Vredestein Quatrac
- 81%from 30 reviews
- 86%would buy again
- 345,646 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Vredestein Quatrac is a strong all-season tire, most often praised for excellent wet-road grip and confident performance in cold conditions, including light-to-moderate snow and ice. Many reviewers highlight strong longevity (often projecting 60-80k km) along with good comfort and generally low noise, making it a solid value alternative to pricier rivals. A minority note higher cabin noise on certain vehicles and slightly less sharp/softer dry handling (especially in hotter temperatures) compared with more summer-focused tires.
- Excellent wet grip and confident wet braking
- Strong cold-weather performance (snow/ice capable for an all-season)
- Good longevity/treadwear and even wear reported by many
- Comfortable ride quality
- Can be noisier for some vehicles/sizes (noted by a minority)
- Dry handling/steering feel not as sporty or can feel softer in heat versus summer-oriented tires
Summarised by AI from 28 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 30 Quatrac reviewsFinally retired these at 55k miles. They were real good over all. Average: price and comfort. Above average: off road, snow and ice grip. Way above average: wet and dry grip. The wear was good too, if my alignment didn't go out I could've gotten about 62k out of these.
These tires went through hell and back. I took my car off road several times with these, they went through several snow storms including a couple blizzards. They never once let me down. I once got mired about 4" deep in muddy sand and was able to get out (fwd civic).
I ended up buying a new set of these. Very satisfied overall, I doubt there's another tire that has such good performance across the board without being costly. My new set was around mid $700s in total including mount, balance and disposal.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 88 sizes of the ClimateActive and 39 of the Quatrac, 25 of them made in both.
| Category | ClimateActive | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 88 sizes, 15 to 22 inch | 39 sizes, 15 to 18 inch |
| Made in both | 25 sizes 165/65 R15175/55 R15175/65 R15185/55 R15185/65 R15195/50 R15195/55 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15195/45 R16195/50 R16195/55 R16and 13 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A84%B16% | B100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C53%B41%D5% | C69%D19%B8%A2%E2% |
| EU label noise | 69-73 dB B96%A4% | 70-72 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 187 of 187 | 106 of 106 |
| On the market since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Replaced | - | Vredestein Quatrac 5 (2014) |
| Awards | Winner: All-Season Value Performer of the Year (WhatTire, 2026/27) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Quatrac was the dearer tire in 2 of the 3 tests that listed prices, by 16.1% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
GT-Radial's ClimateActive and Vredestein's Quatrac sit in the same “premium-touring” all-season bracket on paper, but across four shared tests they behave like two different philosophies: the GT-Radial aims to deliver credible year-round safety at a lower asking price, while the Quatrac chases class-leading balance with fewer compromises.
Looking at consistent patterns across ADAC and AutoBild testing, the Quatrac repeatedly separates itself in the disciplines that most often decide real-world confidence-wet braking/handling and overall composure-while also posting standout ownership metrics like wear and abrasion. The ClimateActive's counterpunch is more situational: it can be competitive (and occasionally better) in aquaplaning and certain winter metrics in specific sizes/tests, and it tends to roll a bit easier (lower rolling resistance), which can appeal to efficiency-minded drivers.
Conclusion
Across the shared tests, the Vredestein Quatrac is the more convincing all-rounder and the safer “default pick.” It won all four head-to-head overall rankings (including two AutoBild test victories) and was consistently better in wet braking-where differences were sometimes meaningful, such as 58.0 m vs 62.2 m in AutoBild's 2025 SUV test (about a 4.2 m advantage). It also tends to be the more complete dynamic tire in wet handling and aquaplaning resistance in the AutoBild tests, while delivering markedly better longevity: +28.5% wear life in AutoBild 2024 (55,140 km vs 42,900 km) and +23.5% in ADAC 2026 (43,600 km vs 35,300 km), alongside lower abrasion.
The GT-Radial ClimateActive makes sense when budget and acceptable all-season competence are the priority, particularly for lower annual mileage and milder climates. It shows flashes of strength-e.g., strong aquaplaning in ADAC 2026 (87.3 vs 86.0 km/h straight aquaplaning and 3.8 vs 3.6 m/s² curved) and some winter-event wins (including ice braking in ADAC 2026: 20.9 m vs 22.3 m). The practical takeaway: if you want the best blend of wet safety, everyday refinement, and long-term value through mileage, the Quatrac is the clearer buy; if you want a cheaper tire that remains generally competent and you won't punish it with high mileage or frequent severe winter driving, the ClimateActive is a reasonable compromise.
ClimateActive vs Quatrac: your questions
Is the GT Radial ClimateActive or the Vredestein Quatrac the better tire?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 4 times and the ClimateActive not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the ClimateActive scores 9.1 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the ClimateActive or the Quatrac?
The Quatrac led 12 of the 15 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Quatrac led 5 of the 6 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 0.8% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.
Which is better in snow?
Across the shared tests the snow measurements are split 5-5 between the ClimateActive and the Quatrac.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The ClimateActive had 2.6% lower rolling resistance (2 tests); the Quatrac lasted 26% longer in the wear tests (2 tests). Owners rate wear 9/10 for the ClimateActive and 8.7/10 for the Quatrac.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Quatrac was 0.6 dB quieter (3 tests). Owners rate comfort 9.8/10 for the ClimateActive and 7.9/10 for the Quatrac.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the ClimateActive 87% from 4 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Quatrac was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 16.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The ClimateActive is made in 88 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the Quatrac in 39 (15 to 18 inch). 25 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the ClimateActive is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac B and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The ClimateActive is the newer design: it reached the market in 2024, the Quatrac in 2020. The Quatrac replaced the Vredestein Quatrac 5.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
3-12 in 16 shared tests
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs GT-Radial ClimateActive
4-0 in 4 shared tests
vs
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Vredestein Quatrac
6-5 in 11 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion