Menu

2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tire Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
4 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Dry
  3. Wet
  4. Snow
  5. Ice
  6. Environment
  7. Results
  8. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
  9. Michelin X Ice North 4
  10. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
  11. Nokian Nordman 8
  12. Continental IceContact 3
  13. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
  14. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
  15. Sava Eskimo Stud

Test Publication:
Moottori
205/55 R16 8 tires 5 categories
Images courtesy of Moottori
Test Publication:
Moottori
Images courtesy of Moottori
Test Size: 205/55 R16
Tires Tested: 8 tires
Test Categories:
5 categories (10 tests)
Similar Tests
We're a little late posting this so there won't be much commentary, but hopefully someone will find it useful in 2022! In 2021, Moottori performed an excellent studded tire test, and included 8 of the best studded winter tires, including the new Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 which goes on to win the test, with the Michelin X-Ice North 4 also performing really well. 

If you spend some time analysing the data, you'll see the winner of the test actually might not be the best tire for you. The test winning tires are all the best tires in the snow and ice, the trade off is dry and wet performance, so If you live in a "milder" extreme winter climate, think carefully about what you want from the tire.

As always, tires are a trade off, and extreme winter performance nearly always hurts how a tire grips in the dry, so think about how you use the studded winter tire before picking the right tire for you.

Here's the data. Enjoy!

Dry

Dry Braking

Spread: 2.88 M (9.4%)|Avg: 32.34 M
Dry braking in meters (80 - 5 km/h) (Lower is better)
  1. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
    30.77 M
  2. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
    31.30 M
  3. Sava Eskimo Stud
    31.86 M
  4. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
    32.57 M
  5. Michelin X Ice North 4
    32.79 M
  6. Nokian Nordman 8
    32.86 M
  7. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
    32.91 M
  8. Continental IceContact 3
    33.65 M

Wet

Wet Braking

Spread: 2.95 M (8.2%)|Avg: 37.30 M
Wet braking in meters (80 - 5 km/h) (Lower is better)
  1. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
    35.86 M
  2. Sava Eskimo Stud
    36.31 M
  3. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
    36.77 M
  4. Continental IceContact 3
    37.10 M
  5. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
    37.21 M
  6. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
    37.76 M
  7. Michelin X Ice North 4
    38.54 M
  8. Nokian Nordman 8
    38.81 M

Wet Handling

Spread: 1.24 s (3%)|Avg: 42.41 s
Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
    41.87 s
  2. Continental IceContact 3
    41.89 s
  3. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
    42.12 s
  4. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
    42.47 s
  5. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
    42.57 s
  6. Nokian Nordman 8
    42.57 s
  7. Sava Eskimo Stud
    42.66 s
  8. Michelin X Ice North 4
    43.11 s

Snow

Snow Traction

Spread: 0.43 s (9.2%)|Avg: 4.86 s
Snow acceleration time (5 - 40 km/h) (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
    4.65 s
  2. Michelin X Ice North 4
    4.77 s
  3. Nokian Nordman 8
    4.80 s
  4. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
    4.83 s
  5. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
    4.88 s
  6. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
    4.94 s
  7. Continental IceContact 3
    4.96 s
  8. Sava Eskimo Stud
    5.08 s

Snow Braking

Spread: 0.76 M (5.1%)|Avg: 15.21 M
Snow braking in meters (40 - 5 km/h) (Lower is better)
  1. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
    14.89 M
  2. Michelin X Ice North 4
    15.11 M
  3. Continental IceContact 3
    15.12 M
  4. Nokian Nordman 8
    15.18 M
  5. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
    15.23 M
  6. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
    15.26 M
  7. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
    15.26 M
  8. Sava Eskimo Stud
    15.65 M

Snow Handling

Spread: 2.76 s (3.3%)|Avg: 85.67 s
Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
    84.60 s
  2. Michelin X Ice North 4
    84.73 s
  3. Continental IceContact 3
    85.23 s
  4. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
    85.38 s
  5. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
    85.83 s
  6. Nokian Nordman 8
    85.86 s
  7. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
    86.37 s
  8. Sava Eskimo Stud
    87.36 s

Ice

Ice Traction

Spread: 3.43 s (82.3%)|Avg: 5.59 s
Ice acceleration time (5 - 30 km/h) (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
    4.17 s
  2. Michelin X Ice North 4
    4.39 s
  3. Nokian Nordman 8
    4.78 s
  4. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
    5.00 s
  5. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
    5.86 s
  6. Continental IceContact 3
    5.89 s
  7. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
    7.02 s
  8. Sava Eskimo Stud
    7.60 s

Ice Braking

Spread: 6.15 M (50.3%)|Avg: 14.90 M
Ice braking in meters (30 - 5 km/h) (Lower is better)
  1. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
    12.22 M
  2. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
    12.51 M
  3. Michelin X Ice North 4
    12.82 M
  4. Nokian Nordman 8
    13.16 M
  5. Continental IceContact 3
    15.42 M
  6. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
    16.56 M
  7. Sava Eskimo Stud
    18.13 M
  8. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
    18.37 M

Ice Handling

Spread: 10.27 s (16.7%)|Avg: 66.10 s
Ice handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
    61.54 s
  2. Michelin X Ice North 4
    62.70 s
  3. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
    63.73 s
  4. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
    66.54 s
  5. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
    66.88 s
  6. Nokian Nordman 8
    67.51 s
  7. Continental IceContact 3
    68.12 s
  8. Sava Eskimo Stud
    71.81 s

Environment

Noise

Spread: 2.80 dB (4.1%)|Avg: 69.39 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
  1. BFGoodrich G Force Stud
    67.50 dB
  2. Continental IceContact 3
    68.60 dB
  3. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
    68.70 dB
  4. Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
    69.60 dB
  5. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
    70.10 dB
  6. Sava Eskimo Stud
    70.10 dB
  7. Nokian Nordman 8
    70.20 dB
  8. Michelin X Ice North 4
    70.30 dB

Results

1st

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

205/55 R16
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 4th 32.57 M 30.77 M +1.8 M 94.47%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 5th 37.21 M 35.86 M +1.35 M 96.37%
Wet Handling 5th 42.57 s 41.87 s +0.7 s 98.36%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 6th 15.26 M 14.89 M +0.37 M 97.58%
Snow Traction 1st 4.65 s 100%
Snow Handling 1st 84.6 s 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Ice Braking 2nd 12.51 M 12.22 M +0.29 M 97.68%
Ice Traction 1st 4.17 s 100%
Ice Handling 1st 61.54 s 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 5th 70.1 dB 67.5 dB +2.6 dB 96.29%
2nd

Michelin X Ice North 4

205/55 R16
Michelin X Ice North 4
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 5th 32.79 M 30.77 M +2.02 M 93.84%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 7th 38.54 M 35.86 M +2.68 M 93.05%
Wet Handling 8th 43.11 s 41.87 s +1.24 s 97.12%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 2nd 15.11 M 14.89 M +0.22 M 98.54%
Snow Traction 2nd 4.77 s 4.65 s +0.12 s 97.48%
Snow Handling 2nd 84.73 s 84.6 s +0.13 s 99.85%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Ice Braking 3rd 12.82 M 12.22 M +0.6 M 95.32%
Ice Traction 2nd 4.39 s 4.17 s +0.22 s 94.99%
Ice Handling 2nd 62.7 s 61.54 s +1.16 s 98.15%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 8th 70.3 dB 67.5 dB +2.8 dB 96.02%
Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 7th 32.91 M 30.77 M +2.14 M 93.5%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 1st 35.86 M 100%
Wet Handling 1st 41.87 s 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 5th 15.23 M 14.89 M +0.34 M 97.77%
Snow Traction 4th 4.83 s 4.65 s +0.18 s 96.27%
Snow Handling 4th 85.38 s 84.6 s +0.78 s 99.09%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Ice Braking 1st 12.22 M 100%
Ice Traction 4th 5 s 4.17 s +0.83 s 83.4%
Ice Handling 3rd 63.73 s 61.54 s +2.19 s 96.56%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 4th 69.6 dB 67.5 dB +2.1 dB 96.98%
4th

Nokian Nordman 8

205/55 R16
Nokian Nordman 8
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 6th 32.86 M 30.77 M +2.09 M 93.64%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 8th 38.81 M 35.86 M +2.95 M 92.4%
Wet Handling 5th 42.57 s 41.87 s +0.7 s 98.36%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 4th 15.18 M 14.89 M +0.29 M 98.09%
Snow Traction 3rd 4.8 s 4.65 s +0.15 s 96.88%
Snow Handling 6th 85.86 s 84.6 s +1.26 s 98.53%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Ice Braking 4th 13.16 M 12.22 M +0.94 M 92.86%
Ice Traction 3rd 4.78 s 4.17 s +0.61 s 87.24%
Ice Handling 6th 67.51 s 61.54 s +5.97 s 91.16%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 7th 70.2 dB 67.5 dB +2.7 dB 96.15%
5th

Continental IceContact 3

205/55 R16
Continental IceContact 3
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 8th 33.65 M 30.77 M +2.88 M 91.44%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 4th 37.1 M 35.86 M +1.24 M 96.66%
Wet Handling 2nd 41.89 s 41.87 s +0.02 s 99.95%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 3rd 15.12 M 14.89 M +0.23 M 98.48%
Snow Traction 7th 4.96 s 4.65 s +0.31 s 93.75%
Snow Handling 3rd 85.23 s 84.6 s +0.63 s 99.26%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Ice Braking 5th 15.42 M 12.22 M +3.2 M 79.25%
Ice Traction 6th 5.89 s 4.17 s +1.72 s 70.8%
Ice Handling 7th 68.12 s 61.54 s +6.58 s 90.34%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 2nd 68.6 dB 67.5 dB +1.1 dB 98.4%
6th

Gislaved Nord Frost 200

205/55 R16
Gislaved Nord Frost 200
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 2nd 31.3 M 30.77 M +0.53 M 98.31%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 6th 37.76 M 35.86 M +1.9 M 94.97%
Wet Handling 3rd 42.12 s 41.87 s +0.25 s 99.41%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 6th 15.26 M 14.89 M +0.37 M 97.58%
Snow Traction 6th 4.94 s 4.65 s +0.29 s 94.13%
Snow Handling 7th 86.37 s 84.6 s +1.77 s 97.95%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Ice Braking 6th 16.56 M 12.22 M +4.34 M 73.79%
Ice Traction 5th 5.86 s 4.17 s +1.69 s 71.16%
Ice Handling 5th 66.88 s 61.54 s +5.34 s 92.02%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 3rd 68.7 dB 67.5 dB +1.2 dB 98.25%
7th

BFGoodrich G Force Stud

205/55 R16
BFGoodrich G Force Stud
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 1st 30.77 M 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 3rd 36.77 M 35.86 M +0.91 M 97.53%
Wet Handling 4th 42.47 s 41.87 s +0.6 s 98.59%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 1st 14.89 M 100%
Snow Traction 5th 4.88 s 4.65 s +0.23 s 95.29%
Snow Handling 5th 85.83 s 84.6 s +1.23 s 98.57%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Ice Braking 8th 18.37 M 12.22 M +6.15 M 66.52%
Ice Traction 7th 7.02 s 4.17 s +2.85 s 59.4%
Ice Handling 4th 66.54 s 61.54 s +5 s 92.49%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 1st 67.5 dB 100%
8th

Sava Eskimo Stud

205/55 R16
Sava Eskimo Stud
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 3rd 31.86 M 30.77 M +1.09 M 96.58%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 2nd 36.31 M 35.86 M +0.45 M 98.76%
Wet Handling 7th 42.66 s 41.87 s +0.79 s 98.15%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 8th 15.65 M 14.89 M +0.76 M 95.14%
Snow Traction 8th 5.08 s 4.65 s +0.43 s 91.54%
Snow Handling 8th 87.36 s 84.6 s +2.76 s 96.84%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Ice Braking 7th 18.13 M 12.22 M +5.91 M 67.4%
Ice Traction 8th 7.6 s 4.17 s +3.43 s 54.87%
Ice Handling 8th 71.81 s 61.54 s +10.27 s 85.7%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 5th 70.1 dB 67.5 dB +2.6 dB 96.29%

comments powered by Disqus