Menu

Yokohama iceGUARD iG53

The Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 is a Nordic studless winter tire with strong snow braking, low rolling resistance and a comfortable ride in its single test. Long wet and dry braking, difficult wet handling and high noise were the main compromises.

The quick answer

Owners say 50% from 1 owner reviews Read the reviews
Tests say 5th average finish across 1 independent tests Latest: P5 of 7 · 2022 See every test
Strengths & weaknesses Value, Ice Dry, Wet Relative to its rivals across every test we hold

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated June 2026.

  • 1owner reviews
  • 20,000miles driven
  • 1professional tests
  • 48sizes available

Tire Reviews Score

Yokohama iceGUARD iG53

3.2/10

Better than 11% of Nordic winter tires

  • Limited Confidence
  • 1 test
  • 1 owner review
Scores of the 44 Nordic winter tires we have tested

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent tests1 test · 1 publication · 2022 11% 100%
Owner reviewsFewer than 5 reviews, so they do not count yet – 0%
Combined 11% 3.2

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Category by category

How it compares with other Nordic winter tires in each area, and how much each area counts. 50 is the middle of the group.

Category Better than Weight Tests
SnowBraking, traction and handling on snow 9% 31% 1
IceBraking, traction and handling on ice 47% 30% 1
WetBraking, handling and aquaplaning in the wet 7% 18% 1
DryBraking and handling on dry roads 7% 9% 1
ValueWear, efficiency and cost 76% 7% 1
ComfortNoise and ride comfort 44% 5% 1

Faded bars rest on one or two tests.

By discipline

The same results grouped by what the tire was doing. They are not counted a second time.

TractionEvery traction test, on any surface 31% 1
HandlingEvery handling test, on any surface 8% 1
BrakingEvery braking test, on any surface 5% 1

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Its own test results decide 81% of the test figure. The other 19% is the average for its group, and it shrinks as more tests arrive.

High needs at least 3 tests, with its own results deciding 90% or more. Medium needs 2 tests and 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as tests arrive.

The tests behind it

  1. 2022 2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test Tire Reviews · 205/55 R16 P5 / 7
1 Tests
0 Test Wins
5th Average
5th Best
5th Worst
The latest test

2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test P5 of 7

The Yokohama Iceguard IG53 peaked in snow braking where it had a surprise win, but that was the only standout result. It had the longest braking in the wet and dry, it was mid pack on ice and has the noisiest tire on test. It did however have one of the lowest rolling resistances on test. A tire like this is certainly a better buy than a tire like the Federal, but it still sits behind the rest of the group.

Strong: Snow Braking, Subj. Comfort Weak: Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Handling, Subj. Wet Handling, Snow Handling, Snow Circle, Noise Winner: Continental VikingContact 7

Every independent test of the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20222022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire TestTire Reviews · 205/55 R16P5 / 7Tested by Tire Reviews

Videos

The BEST Tires for Snow & Ice Tested! Nokian vs Michelin vs Continental vs Yokohama vs Cooper + more

The BEST Tires for Snow & Ice Tested! Nokian vs Michelin vs Continental vs Yokohama vs Cooper + more

Dimensions & Label Scores
View All

Size Range44 sizes available

175-295Width30-65Profile15-21Rim82-109 T-HLoad/Speed Index2019First On Market

EU LabelAcross 44 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.

Noise

69-73dB B

3PMSF on every size

Ice grip

Popular sizes215/55 R16
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 in the wet?
Across the 1 wet-braking test it has featured in, the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 stops 17% longer than premium rivals, 6.1% longer than mid-range rivals and 15.2% longer than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews wet score of 7/100, and owners rate it 2/10 in the wet from 1 review.
How good is the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 in the dry?
Across the 1 dry-braking test it has featured in, the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 stops 9% longer than premium rivals, 2.1% longer than mid-range rivals and 5.6% longer than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews dry score of 7/100, and owners rate it 6/10 in the dry from 1 review.
How good is the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 in the snow?
Across the 1 snow-braking test it has featured in, the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 stops 2.9% shorter than premium rivals, 1.6% shorter than mid-range rivals and 2.4% shorter than budget rivals. Across the 1 snow-traction test, it is 4% worse than premium rivals, 3.8% worse than mid-range rivals and 1.8% better than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews snow score of 9/100, and owners rate it 8/10 in the snow from 1 review.
How good is the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 on ice?
Across the 1 ice-braking test it has featured in, the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 stops level with premium rivals, 10.3% longer than mid-range rivals and 13.3% shorter than budget rivals. Across the 1 ice-traction test, it is 8% better than premium rivals, 11.7% worse than mid-range rivals and 30.2% better than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews ice score of 47/100, and owners rate it 8/10 on ice from 1 review.
How fuel efficient is the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53?
Across the 1 test measuring rolling resistance, the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53's rolling resistance is 3.9% lower than premium rivals, 6.6% lower than mid-range rivals and 28.8% lower than budget rivals.
More questions about the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 (2)
What is the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53's EU tire label rating?
Across its range, the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 most commonly carries EU label ratings of C for fuel efficiency, E for wet grip and 72 dB for noise.
What sizes does the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 come in?
The Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 is available in 48 sizes, ranging from 175-295/30-65 R15-21.
Owner Questions
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!

Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 Owner Reviews

Review this tire

Owner ratings averaged from 1 ratings

  • Owner score 50%
  • Comfort 80%
  • Snow Grip 80%
  • Ice Grip 80%
  • Dry Grip 60%
  • Road Feedback 50%
  • Handling 40%
  • Wear 30%
  • Wet Grip 20%

All 1 Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 reviews

Score spread across 1 written reviews
50%
Member
Initial Impressions
After, now, 6 winter seasons: these are going in the bin.

From new, wet performance was abysmal and concerning bordering on alarmingly bad. Damp roads, wet roads, slush, or anything with a breath of moisture in the air: wet traction is just outright bad.

Dry performance is just fine for a midrange winter tire. I do need to adjust my driving style when I first mount them for the season but nothing I wouldn’t say is “bad”. On grooved concrete roads, though, the tires will try and wander - it’s a bit disconcerting the first time.

Snow and ice performance, unlike the damp, is actually quite good.

These are not something I would ever buy again. The wet performance is unbelievably awful, and as temperatures float above / below freezing : it’s just unacceptable.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 6
  • Wet Grip 2
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 4
  • Wear 3
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 1
  • Snow Grip 8
  • Ice Grip 8
Helpful 26

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53?
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.