Menu

Nexen N Blue HD Test Results

Tested 2012 to 2014 3 publications

Tested 4 times by independent publications, the Nexen N Blue HD averages a finish of 12th.

  • 4Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 1Podium finishes
  • 12thAverage finish
  • 46%Field beaten on average
  • 3Publications

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Nexen N Blue HD. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Michelin Energy Saver+ 4 shared: 1 ahead, 3 behind 4 1 3 - 25%
Bridgestone Turanza T001 4 shared: 1 ahead, 3 behind 4 1 3 - 25%
Vredestein Sportrac 5 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Fulda EcoControl HP 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Nokian Line 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Continental Premium Contact 5 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Dunlop Sport BluResponse 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 4 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

The Nexen N Blue HD has a mixed overall record, with fuel consumption a more consistent positive and wear a repeated concern. ADAC placed it 14th of 19 in its 2013 European summer touring test in 185/60 R15, praising fuel consumption but criticising high wear. The 2014 ADAC test in 195/65 R15 again placed it 14th, this time of 17, with relatively low fuel consumption offset by wet-road and wear weaknesses. The separate 2013 54 Tire Braking Test in 195/65 R15 placed it 18th of 54, a more competitive result, although no individual braking breakdown is available here.

Its 3rd of 8 in the 2012 Auto Express Summer Tire Test in 205/55 R16 is an unusually strong overall placing against that later record. The field was closely grouped, with all eight within 2% overall, and Auto Express said strong wet and aquaplaning performance compensated for a near-last dry result. That wet-road praise contrasts with ADAC’s criticism in 2014, so it should not be treated as a consistent wet-grip strength. With no measured discipline margins here, the clearest repeated findings are favorable fuel consumption and unsatisfactory wear, alongside variation in grip between tests.

Performance Strengths

  • Rolling resistance Strong in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • ADAC gave top marks for fuel consumption in its 2013 European summer touring test.
    • ADAC praised relatively low fuel consumption in its 2014 195/65 R15 test.
  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • Auto Express praised aquaplaning performance in its 2012 summer test.
  • Wet grip Strong in 1 of 2 tests
    Details

Performance Weaknesses

  • Tread life Strong in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • ADAC criticised high wear in 2013 and wear weaknesses in 2014.
  • Dry handling Minor in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • Auto Express described a near-last dry result in 2012.
  • Wet grip Minor in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • ADAC criticised wet performance in 2014, contrasting with Auto Express’s favorable 2012 verdict.

Every test, newest first 4

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2014 1 test
2013 2 tests
2012 1 test
P3 of 8 Beat 71% of the field

2012 Auto Express Summer Tire Test

Auto Express 205/55 R16

Nearly last in the dry, the new Nexen NBlue HD was saved by its strong wet and aquaplaning performance to secure 3rd place

WinnerGoodyear EfficientGrip

Back to the Nexen N Blue HD overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Nexen tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.