Menu

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say summarised from 87 reviews

Owners rate the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 highly overall (average 80.7%), most often praising its strong dry grip and confident, predictable dry handling, backed up by a comfortable, generally quiet ride. Wet grip is also widely seen as secure for a touring tire, with many calling it reassuring in heavy rain, though a minority report some instability or weaker aquaplaning resistance. The main recurring drawback is longevity: wear and performance consistency split opinion, with around one in four owners mentioning tread life and around one in ten saying grip drops off noticeably as the tire wears, sometimes accompanied by increased noise.

What owners mention most counted across 81 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 97 ratings

  • Owner score 81%
  • Dry Grip 88%
  • Wet Grip 83%
  • Handling 82%
  • Road Feedback 81%
  • Comfort 80%
  • Wear 78%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Reviews - Page 2

Score spread across 84 written reviews
89%
SENOL
Initial Impressions
Comfort and driving safety are my priorities. I'm very satisfied with the price-quality balance of these tires.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 83
53%
Neyfun
Initial Impressions
The grip is fine. I drive normally, respecting speed limits, so this tire doesn't bother me in that regard.

However, the comfort is a disaster. The tire feels unstable on my vehicle, causing jolts at low speeds and significant vibrations in the steering wheel at all speeds. It's extremely sensitive to road surfaces. It's also noisy.
I don't know if this is the case with all vehicles, but I strongly advise against it for my model.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 1
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 1
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 78

Tyre reviews and ratingsTire Reviews Replies

This sounds like a potential balance of suspension freshness. Worth investigating at a new garage in case the fitting garage wasn't great at balancing.
84%
tim26
Initial Impressions
It was mostly used on intercity roads and sometimes within the city. It has excellent road handling and braking in hot weather and heavy rain. Sometimes the tires spin out. Another disadvantage is the sudden loss of tire grip on sharp turns.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 82

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Hankook Ventus Prime 4? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Hankook Ventus Prime 4?
93%
Member
Initial Impressions
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 235/40/r18 95w XL. I used these tires on my BMW F30 for approximately 45,000 km. I chose them because they prioritize comfort, low road noise, and good driving dynamics. The Hankooks never disappointed me. I don't want to compare them to my previous tires (Pirelli) because they were very worn and had accumulated many kilometers. From day one to 45,000 km, the Hankooks always felt good. Road grip, braking distance, comfort, and road noise were all positive. Water drainage was a little weak in heavy rain. Other than that, I didn't see any negative aspects. However, I didn't expect sporty performance from the tires. It was a tire I used daily, occasionally pushing it in corners. In that respect, it satisfied me. It wasn't an ultra-quiet tire in terms of road noise, but road noise never bothered me. When I wanted to drive dynamically, I didn't see any significant shortcomings. It's a very balanced tire. Even at 45,000 km, the tires looked like new. There was no abrasion or cracks. Even the treads were as soft as new, meaning they hadn't hardened. That aspect really impressed me. I used the same tires, in size 225/45 R19, on my Mercedes for a short time. I was very happy with those tires too. However, the tires I bought for my two cars and was satisfied with were made in Hungary. We bought Hankook Ventus Prime tires, also made in South Korea, for another friend. His tires developed abrasion and cracks after 30,000 km. We concluded that the quality of the South Korean-made tires might be lower. Now I've ordered the same tires for my BMW G20. The previous tires were runflat and very hard, so they needed replacing. I hope I'll be satisfied with these tires as well.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 100
60%
Member
Initial Impressions
On the wear strip after 15k miles steady driving! Avoid
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 244
83%
Member
Initial Impressions
It was nice, I was pleased.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 294
63%
Member
Hyundai accent blue/solaris/verna 195/50/16 original size. I use size 195/55/16 to increase comfort. I was using continental ecocontact5 before. I wanted to save a little, but I regretted it.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 5
  • Wet Grip 4
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 289
85%
Dimitar Atanasov Contributor
I replaced my worn out Michelin pilot sport 4 with the Ventus prime 4 and the difference in comfort and noice was noticeable. Dry and wet grip were not on par with the Michelin, but not significantly worse. Used them for only around 5000km before I sold the car, but as a touring tire, and for half the price of the Michelin, you cannot go wrong with them. Especially comfort wise.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 296
86%
Normal person
  • Toyota Camry
  • 205/65 R16
  • 39,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Spirited
I'll start with the positives:
1- High safety with these tires. Despite having approximately three studs per tire, I didn't experience any vibration or sudden blowouts from any tire, even while driving at speeds exceeding 120 km/h.
2- The grip level remained almost constant over two years of use in desert city weather. The difference between the first day of use and the last was negligible, especially considering the high speeds I typically took on turns. This contrasts with other tire brands where the difference between old and new tires is significant.
3- Very low wear rate and long tire life. I reached 50,000 km with approximately half the tread remaining.
4- Excellent comfort.
5- Very quiet tire noise when new.

Disadvantages:
1- The biggest problem with this tire is its tendency to pick up nails from the road. Each tire has approximately three nail holes, a problem I haven't experienced with any other tire from any other company.
2- There's a significant difference in noise level between the new and old tires.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 6
Helpful 343
67%
Member
  • Honda City
  • 195/55 R15
  • 15,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Average
Perfect budget tire, which is quite good in both dry and wet grip. However is quite noisy and harsh ride in my opinion.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 3
  • Buy again 6
Helpful 299
74%
Member
Got this tire as I had previous good experience with Hankook. Overall I was happy with it but there was room for improvement. In the dry, it is silent and very direct, making it good for any environment and driving style, with short brake distance and good fuel efficiency. In the wet I was diasppointed, the car was very often unstable because of slight aquaplaning. I was unhappy with the material quality as well, this tire seems very prone to punctures (2 times in 4 months), costing me a lot to get them running again. They also collected a lot more dust than other tires on the sidewall, as I found. I felt safe using them until now but I know it is time to move on. There was god tread left in the tires when I got the removed.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 417
61%
Member
  • BMW 320i
  • 225/50 R17
  • 1,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Spirited
I had these tires on my BMW F30 LCI 320iA xDrive (225/50R17 98W XL) and absolutely hated them. They had a strange “feature”: after about 10-15 minutes of highway driving, they began to produce a faint but clearly audible whining noise at a constant pitch. Once the tires warmed up, their characteristics seemed to change. At first, I suspected something was wrong with the car, perhaps the differential or bearings, but after having it checked, everything was fine. The noise disappeared completely once I switched to new summer tires. In general, they were also much louder than the advertised 69 dB rating would suggest.

I’m now running Michelin Primacy 5 tires, which are quiet and excellent in every respect.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 2
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 357
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.