Menu

Test Charts / Die Reifentester

2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tire Test - 225/40 R18

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/40 R18
Tires tested
9
Disciplines
12
Test vehicle
VW Golf GTI Clubsport

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
121 ft Best 0 mph
124 ft +3 ft 12 mph
125 ft +4 ft 15 mph
127 ft +6 ft 18 mph
129 ft +8 ft 20 mph
129 ft +8 ft 20 mph
130 ft +9 ft 22 mph
131 ft +10 ft 23 mph
136 ft +15 ft 27 mph

The difference between best and worst was 12.8% (15 ft ≈ 1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ would still be travelling at 27 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
83 Points Best
82 Points -1.00 Points
79 Points -4.00 Points
77 Points -6.00 Points
77 Points -6.00 Points
75 Points -8.00 Points
73 Points -10.00 Points
72 Points -11.00 Points
72 Points -11.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 13.3% (11 Points).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
99 ft Best 0 mph
100 ft +1 ft 6 mph
101 ft +2 ft 9 mph
101 ft +2 ft 11 mph
102 ft +3 ft 13 mph
102 ft +3 ft 14 mph
103 ft +4 ft 14 mph
103 ft +4 ft 14 mph
104 ft +5 ft 17 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5% (5 ft ≈ 0.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Michelin CrossClimate 3 would still be travelling at 17 mph when the Nokian Seasonproof 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
85 Points Best
84 Points -1.00 Points
79 Points -6.00 Points
78 Points -7.00 Points
78 Points -7.00 Points
77 Points -8.00 Points
76 Points -9.00 Points
75 Points -10.00 Points
74 Points -11.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 12.9% (11 Points).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
56.4 mph Best
54.0 mph -2.4 mph
53.7 mph -2.7 mph
53.7 mph -2.7 mph
53.4 mph -3.0 mph
53.0 mph -3.4 mph
52.4 mph -4.0 mph
50.5 mph -5.9 mph
49.7 mph -6.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (6.7 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
9.4 ft/s² Best
8.8 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
8.6 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
8.4 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
8.2 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
8.1 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
8.1 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
7.9 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
7.1 ft/s² -2.3 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 25.3% (2.3 ft/s²).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
86 ft Best 0 mph
88 ft +2 ft 11 mph
89 ft +3 ft 13 mph
90 ft +4 ft 15 mph
90 ft +4 ft 16 mph
91 ft +5 ft 17 mph
92 ft +6 ft 20 mph
93 ft +7 ft 21 mph
94 ft +8 ft 22 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.4% (8 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nokian Seasonproof 2 would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
522 lbf Best
518 lbf -4 lbf
512 lbf -10 lbf
512 lbf -10 lbf
493 lbf -29 lbf
486 lbf -36 lbf
483 lbf -39 lbf
471 lbf -51 lbf
454 lbf -68 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 13.1% (68 lbf).

Subj. Snow Handling

Subjective Snow Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
79 Points Best
79 Points Best
77 Points -2.00 Points
76 Points -3.00 Points
74 Points -5.00 Points
73 Points -6.00 Points
71 Points -8.00 Points
69 Points -10.00 Points
69 Points -10.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 12.7% (10 Points).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
82 Points Best
81 Points -1.00 Points
79 Points -3.00 Points
79 Points -3.00 Points
76 Points -6.00 Points
74 Points -8.00 Points
73 Points -9.00 Points
72 Points -10.00 Points
71 Points -11.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 13.4% (11 Points).

Subj. Noise

Subjective in car noise levels

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
81 Points Best
79 Points -2.00 Points
78 Points -3.00 Points
77 Points -4.00 Points
75 Points -6.00 Points
75 Points -6.00 Points
74 Points -7.00 Points
74 Points -7.00 Points
72 Points -9.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (9 Points).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.71 kg/t Best $0
7.75 kg/t +0.04 kg/t $2
8 kg/t +0.29 kg/t $11
8.04 kg/t +0.33 kg/t $13
8.19 kg/t +0.48 kg/t $18
8.37 kg/t +0.66 kg/t $25
8.51 kg/t +0.80 kg/t $30
8.94 kg/t +1.23 kg/t $47
9.05 kg/t +1.34 kg/t $51

The difference between best and worst was 17.4% (1.34 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 uses about 14 gal ($51) more fuel than the Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.