Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tire in each test.
| # | Tire | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Comfort | Value | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Subj. Dry Handling Points | % | Braking M | Handling s | Circle s | Straight Aqua Km/H | Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | % | Subj. Comfort Points | Noise dB | % | Rolling Resistance kg / t | Energy Consumption kWh/100km | % | |||
| 1 | Hankook iON Evo | 97.7% | 34.8 ★ | 7.75 ★ | 100% | 48.6 3 | 83.6 ★ | 11.49 ★ | 81.5 ★ | 3.26 2 | 98.6% | 7 ★ | 71.9 2 | 99.7% | .7 | 14.12 | 83.8% |
| 2 ▲1 | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | 95.2% | 37.1 3 | 7.438 2 | 94.2% | 48.7 | 86.4 3 | 11.59 2 | 72.9 | 2.77 | 94.8% | 6.5 2 | 72.2 3 | 95.9% | .536 ★ | 12.86 ★ | 100% |
| 3 ▼1 | Continental UltraContact NXT | 94.9% | 37 2 | 7 | 93.4% | 47.2 ★ | 87 | 11.71 | 74.5 | 2.9 | 95.8% | 6.5 2 | 72.4 | 95.7% | .587 2 | 12.95 2 | 95.3% |
| 4 ▲1 | Pirelli Powergy | 93.6% | 37.2 | 7.188 3 | 93.4% | 49.4 | 86.3 2 | 11.7 3 | 74.8 | 2.79 | 94.6% | 6.5 2 | 71.4 ★ | 96.4% | .667 | 13.34 | 88.4% |
| 5 ▼1 | Michelin Primacy 5 | 92.9% | 38.3 | 6.688 | 90.1% | 47.8 2 | 87.3 | 12.1 | 77.8 3 | 3.21 3 | 96% | 6.5 2 | 72.7 | 95.5% | .677 | 13.78 | 86.2% |
| 6 ▲1 | Sava Intensa SUV 2 | 92.1% | 38.2 | 7.063 | 91.1% | 52.7 | 87.1 | 11.77 | 79 2 | 3.45 ★ | 95.3% | 6 | 72.6 | 92% | .784 | 14.21 | 79.4% |
| 7 ▼1 | Barum Bravuris 6 | 90.2% | 39.3 | 6.125 | 86.9% | 52.6 | 89.7 | 12.1 | 72.9 | 2.82 | 91.1% | 6.5 2 | 72.7 | 95.5% | .6 3 | 12.96 3 | 94.3% |
| 8 | Kormoran Ultra High Performance | 87.8% | 38.7 | 5.688 | 87.1% | 57.4 | 93.2 | 12.55 | 72.2 | 3.03 | 87.9% | 5.5 | 72.3 | 88.7% | .664 | 13.27 | 88.8% |
| 9 | Imperial EcoSport SUV | 86.1% | 40.7 | 5.813 | 83.7% | 58.1 | 91.9 | 12.19 | 73.5 | 3.08 | 89% | 6 | 72.7 | 92% | .841 | 14.4 | 76.5% |
| 10 | Tomket Tomket Suv | 83.1% | 42 | 5.438 | 80.7% | 62.3 | 95.4 | 12.44 | 71.1 | 2.62 | 84.4% | 6 | 72.9 | 91.8% | .786 | 13.76 | 80.8% |
Scroll for more
Dry
100%
Wet
99%
Comfort
100%
Value
84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
34.8 M
★
Subj. Dry Handling
7.75 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
48.6 M
3
Wet Handling
83.6 s
★
Wet Circle
11.49 s
★
Straight Aqua
81.5 Km/H
★
Curved Aquaplaning
3.26 m/sec2
2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
7 Points
★
Noise
71.9 dB
2
Value
Rolling Resistance
.7 kg / t
Energy Consumption
14.12 kWh/100km
Dry
94%
Wet
95%
Comfort
96%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.1 M
3
Subj. Dry Handling
7.438 Points
2
Wet
Wet Braking
48.7 M
Wet Handling
86.4 s
3
Wet Circle
11.59 s
2
Straight Aqua
72.9 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.77 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
6.5 Points
2
Noise
72.2 dB
3
Value
Rolling Resistance
.536 kg / t
★
Energy Consumption
12.86 kWh/100km
★
Dry
93%
Wet
96%
Comfort
96%
Value
95%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37 M
2
Subj. Dry Handling
7 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
47.2 M
★
Wet Handling
87 s
Wet Circle
11.71 s
Straight Aqua
74.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.9 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
6.5 Points
2
Noise
72.4 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
.587 kg / t
2
Energy Consumption
12.95 kWh/100km
2
Dry
93%
Wet
95%
Comfort
96%
Value
88%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.2 M
Subj. Dry Handling
7.188 Points
3
Wet
Wet Braking
49.4 M
Wet Handling
86.3 s
2
Wet Circle
11.7 s
3
Straight Aqua
74.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.79 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
6.5 Points
2
Noise
71.4 dB
★
Value
Rolling Resistance
.667 kg / t
Energy Consumption
13.34 kWh/100km
Dry
90%
Wet
96%
Comfort
96%
Value
86%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.3 M
Subj. Dry Handling
6.688 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
47.8 M
2
Wet Handling
87.3 s
Wet Circle
12.1 s
Straight Aqua
77.8 Km/H
3
Curved Aquaplaning
3.21 m/sec2
3
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
6.5 Points
2
Noise
72.7 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
.677 kg / t
Energy Consumption
13.78 kWh/100km
Dry
91%
Wet
95%
Comfort
92%
Value
79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.2 M
Subj. Dry Handling
7.063 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
52.7 M
Wet Handling
87.1 s
Wet Circle
11.77 s
Straight Aqua
79 Km/H
2
Curved Aquaplaning
3.45 m/sec2
★
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
6 Points
Noise
72.6 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
.784 kg / t
Energy Consumption
14.21 kWh/100km
Dry
87%
Wet
91%
Comfort
96%
Value
94%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.3 M
Subj. Dry Handling
6.125 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
52.6 M
Wet Handling
89.7 s
Wet Circle
12.1 s
Straight Aqua
72.9 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.82 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
6.5 Points
2
Noise
72.7 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
.6 kg / t
3
Energy Consumption
12.96 kWh/100km
3
Dry
87%
Wet
88%
Comfort
89%
Value
89%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.7 M
Subj. Dry Handling
5.688 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
57.4 M
Wet Handling
93.2 s
Wet Circle
12.55 s
Straight Aqua
72.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.03 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
5.5 Points
Noise
72.3 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
.664 kg / t
Energy Consumption
13.27 kWh/100km
Dry
84%
Wet
89%
Comfort
92%
Value
77%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
40.7 M
Subj. Dry Handling
5.813 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
58.1 M
Wet Handling
91.9 s
Wet Circle
12.19 s
Straight Aqua
73.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.08 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
6 Points
Noise
72.7 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
.841 kg / t
Energy Consumption
14.4 kWh/100km
Dry
81%
Wet
84%
Comfort
92%
Value
81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
42 M
Subj. Dry Handling
5.438 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
62.3 M
Wet Handling
95.4 s
Wet Circle
12.44 s
Straight Aqua
71.1 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.62 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
6 Points
Noise
72.9 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
.786 kg / t
Energy Consumption
13.76 kWh/100km
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tires based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tire's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tire moves when your custom weighting is applied.
