Test Charts / Auto Bild
2026 Auto Bild 205/55 R16 Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 14
- Disciplines
- 14
- Test vehicle
- VW Golf
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
115 ft | -19 ft | 0 mph |
| 134 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 137 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
140 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph |
| 140 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 141 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 141 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 142 ft | +8 ft | 18 mph | |
| 142 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 142 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 144 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph | |
| 145 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 146 ft | +12 ft | 23 mph | |
| 147 ft | +13 ft | 23 mph | |
| 150 ft | +16 ft | 26 mph | |
| 154 ft | +20 ft | 29 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 34.4% (39 ft ≈ 2.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nexen Winguard Sport 3 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
51.3 mph | +0.4 mph |
| 50.9 mph | Best | |
| 50.8 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 50.7 mph | -0.2 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
50.6 mph | -0.3 mph |
| 50.5 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 50.5 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 50.4 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 50.4 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 50.3 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 50.3 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 50.2 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 50.2 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 50.0 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 50.0 mph | -0.9 mph |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
138 ft | -14 ft | 0 mph |
| 152 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 153 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 154 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 155 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 156 ft | +4 ft | 12 mph | |
| 156 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 156 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 157 ft | +5 ft | 14 mph | |
| 157 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 160 ft | +8 ft | 18 mph | |
| 162 ft | +10 ft | 20 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
163 ft | +11 ft | 21 mph |
| 166 ft | +14 ft | 23 mph | |
| 166 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph | |
| 175 ft | +23 ft | 29 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 26.3% (37 ft ≈ 2.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nexen Winguard Sport 3 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
42.5 mph | +0.2 mph |
| 42.3 mph | Best | |
| 42.1 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 42.1 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 41.9 mph | -0.4 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
41.9 mph | -0.4 mph |
| 41.8 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 41.7 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 41.6 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 41.6 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 41.4 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 41.4 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 41.3 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 41.0 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 40.8 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 40.3 mph | -2.0 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (2.2 mph).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
15.4 s | -0.33 s |
| 15.73 s | Best | |
| 15.81 s | +0.08 s | |
| 15.92 s | +0.19 s | |
RefReference All Season |
15.99 s | +0.26 s |
| 16.02 s | +0.29 s | |
| 16.05 s | +0.32 s | |
| 16.05 s | +0.32 s | |
| 16.06 s | +0.33 s | |
| 16.1 s | +0.37 s | |
| 16.21 s | +0.48 s | |
| 16.23 s | +0.50 s | |
| 16.23 s | +0.50 s | |
| 16.31 s | +0.58 s | |
| 16.34 s | +0.61 s | |
| 16.4 s | +0.67 s |
The difference between best and worst was 6.5% (1 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 52.8 mph | Best | |
| 51.9 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 51.1 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 50.5 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 50.0 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 49.9 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 49.8 mph | -3.0 mph | |
| 49.7 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 49.5 mph | -3.3 mph | |
| 49.5 mph | -3.3 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
48.5 mph | -4.3 mph |
| 48.0 mph | -4.8 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
46.0 mph | -6.8 mph |
| 43.0 mph | -9.8 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 18.5% (9.8 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 13.1 ft/s² | Best | |
| 12.1 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 12.1 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 12.1 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
RefReference Summer |
11.8 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² |
| 11.5 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -2.3 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -2.9 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -3.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -3.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -3.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.5 ft/s² | -3.6 ft/s² | |
| 9.5 ft/s² | -3.6 ft/s² | |
RefReference All Season |
9.2 ft/s² | -3.9 ft/s² |
| 9.2 ft/s² | -3.9 ft/s² | |
| 5.6 ft/s² | -7.5 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 57.5% (7.5 ft/s²).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 79 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 79 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 79 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 79 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 80 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 81 ft | +5 ft | 19 mph | |
| 81 ft | +5 ft | 20 mph | |
| 82 ft | +6 ft | 20 mph | |
| 82 ft | +6 ft | 20 mph | |
| 83 ft | +7 ft | 22 mph | |
| 83 ft | +7 ft | 22 mph | |
| 83 ft | +7 ft | 22 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
86 ft | +10 ft | 26 mph |
| 89 ft | +13 ft | 30 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
188 ft | +112 ft | 62 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 145.5% (112 ft ≈ 7.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Toyo Observe EWS1 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 1,227 lbf | Best | |
| 1,209 lbf | -18 lbf | |
| 1,205 lbf | -22 lbf | |
| 1,205 lbf | -22 lbf | |
| 1,198 lbf | -29 lbf | |
| 1,181 lbf | -46 lbf | |
| 1,174 lbf | -53 lbf | |
| 1,174 lbf | -53 lbf | |
| 1,171 lbf | -56 lbf | |
| 1,151 lbf | -76 lbf | |
| 1,151 lbf | -76 lbf | |
| 1,148 lbf | -79 lbf | |
| 1,145 lbf | -82 lbf | |
RefReference All Season |
1,108 lbf | -119 lbf |
| 1,093 lbf | -134 lbf | |
RefReference Summer |
464 lbf | -763 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 62.2% (763 lbf).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 39.1 mph | Best | |
| 38.5 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 38.4 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 38.1 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 38.0 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 37.3 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 37.1 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 37.0 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 36.8 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 36.7 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 36.7 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 36.6 mph | -2.5 mph | |
| 35.4 mph | -3.7 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
35.0 mph | -4.1 mph |
| 33.1 mph | -6.0 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 15.3% (6 mph).
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 14.5 ft/s² | Best | |
| 12.8 ft/s² | -1.7 ft/s² | |
| 12.6 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 12.5 ft/s² | -2.0 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -2.1 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -2.1 ft/s² | |
| 12.3 ft/s² | -2.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.3 ft/s² | -2.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.3 ft/s² | -2.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.2 ft/s² | -2.3 ft/s² | |
| 12.0 ft/s² | -2.5 ft/s² | |
| 11.9 ft/s² | -2.6 ft/s² | |
| 11.8 ft/s² | -2.7 ft/s² | |
| 11.8 ft/s² | -2.7 ft/s² | |
RefReference All Season |
11.0 ft/s² | -3.5 ft/s² |
RefReference Summer |
7.2 ft/s² | -7.3 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 50.3% (7.3 ft/s²).
Comfort
2Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9.6 Points | Best | |
| 9.4 Points | -0.20 Points | |
| 9.4 Points | -0.20 Points | |
| 9.4 Points | -0.20 Points | |
| 9 Points | -0.60 Points | |
| 9 Points | -0.60 Points | |
| 9 Points | -0.60 Points | |
| 9 Points | -0.60 Points | |
| 8.8 Points | -0.80 Points | |
| 8.6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8.6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8.6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8.4 Points | -1.20 Points | |
| 7.8 Points | -1.80 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 18.8% (1.8 Points).
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 68.8 dB | Best | |
| 69.9 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 70.1 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 70.3 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 70.5 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 71.1 dB | +2.30 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 71.3 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +3.10 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +3.50 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +3.60 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +3.80 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
72.7 dB | +3.90 dB |
RefReference All Season |
72.9 dB | +4.10 dB |
| 73.4 dB | +4.60 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (4.6 dB).
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.94 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.98 kg/t | +0.04 kg/t | $1 | |
| 8.34 kg/t | +0.40 kg/t | $15 | |
| 8.36 kg/t | +0.42 kg/t | $16 | |
| 8.46 kg/t | +0.52 kg/t | $19 | |
| 8.5 kg/t | +0.56 kg/t | $21 | |
| 8.59 kg/t | +0.65 kg/t | $24 | |
| 8.62 kg/t | +0.68 kg/t | $25 | |
| 8.64 kg/t | +0.70 kg/t | $26 | |
| 8.7 kg/t | +0.76 kg/t | $28 | |
| 8.74 kg/t | +0.80 kg/t | $30 | |
| 8.77 kg/t | +0.83 kg/t | $31 | |
| 9.49 kg/t | +1.55 kg/t | $57 | |
| 9.89 kg/t | +1.95 kg/t | $72 |
The difference between best and worst was 24.6% (1.95 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 uses about 20 gal ($72) more fuel than the Michelin Alpin 7.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 AvD Winter Tire Test
225/45 R1715 tires tested
8 of these 14 tires tested again
2026 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
205/55 R1611 tires tested
8 of these 14 tires tested again
2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test
205/55 R1655 tires tested
8 of these 14 tires tested again
