Menu

Test Charts / Auto Express

2025 Auto Express All Season Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R17
Tires tested
6
Disciplines
12
Test vehicle
Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefVredestein Ultrac+
118 ft -3 ft 0 mph
121 ft Best 0 mph
125 ft +4 ft 15 mph
131 ft +10 ft 22 mph
133 ft +12 ft 24 mph
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
138 ft +17 ft 28 mph
139 ft +18 ft 29 mph
139 ft +18 ft 29 mph

The difference between best and worst was 18.1% (21 ft ≈ 1.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefVredestein Ultrac+
49.5 s -0.50 s
50 s Best
50.1 s +0.10 s
50.15 s +0.15 s
50.15 s +0.15 s
50.3 s +0.30 s
50.97 s +0.97 s
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
51.12 s +1.12 s

The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (1.62 s).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefVredestein Ultrac+
96 ft 0 ft 0 mph
96 ft Best 0 mph
97 ft +1 ft 7 mph
98 ft +2 ft 9 mph
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
101 ft +5 ft 17 mph
103 ft +7 ft 20 mph
103 ft +7 ft 20 mph
113 ft +17 ft 30 mph

The difference between best and worst was 17.8% (17 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefVredestein Ultrac+
83.64 s -2.76 s
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
85.38 s -1.02 s
86.4 s Best
86.92 s +0.52 s
87.01 s +0.61 s
87.89 s +1.49 s
87.98 s +1.58 s
88.8 s +2.40 s

The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (5.16 s).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefVredestein Ultrac+
11.89 s -0.13 s
12.02 s Best
12.19 s +0.17 s
12.31 s +0.29 s
12.32 s +0.30 s
12.32 s +0.30 s
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
12.5 s +0.48 s
12.75 s +0.73 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.2% (0.86 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
50.8 mph +0.2 mph
50.6 mph Best
49.8 mph -0.8 mph
RefVredestein Ultrac+
48.8 mph -1.8 mph
48.3 mph -2.3 mph
47.8 mph -2.8 mph
47.7 mph -2.9 mph
47.4 mph -3.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (3.4 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefVredestein Ultrac+
11.9 ft/s² +1.0 ft/s²
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
11.4 ft/s² +0.5 ft/s²
10.9 ft/s² Best
10.4 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
10.4 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
10.1 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
9.7 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
9.1 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 23.2% (2.8 ft/s²).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (30 - 3 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
94 ft -3 ft 0 mph
97 ft Best 0 mph
98 ft +1 ft 8 mph
99 ft +2 ft 8 mph
99 ft +2 ft 8 mph
99 ft +2 ft 9 mph
113 ft +16 ft 30 mph
RefVredestein Ultrac+
178 ft +81 ft 54 mph

The difference between best and worst was 88.9% (84 ft ≈ 5.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
4.06 s -0.05 s
4.11 s Best
4.24 s +0.13 s
4.25 s +0.14 s
4.33 s +0.22 s
4.34 s +0.23 s
5.01 s +0.90 s
RefVredestein Ultrac+
8.97 s +4.86 s

The difference between best and worst was 120.9% (4.91 s).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
52.77 s -0.53 s
53.3 s Best
53.41 s +0.11 s
53.62 s +0.32 s
53.68 s +0.38 s
55.18 s +1.88 s
55.75 s +2.45 s
RefVredestein Ultrac+
83.41 s +30.11 s

The difference between best and worst was 58.1% (30.64 s).

Comfort

1

Noise

Internal noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefVredestein Ultrac+
63.1 dB -4.10 dB
67.2 dB Best
67.8 dB +0.60 dB
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
67.9 dB +0.70 dB
67.9 dB +0.70 dB
68.2 dB +1.00 dB
68.2 dB +1.00 dB
68.5 dB +1.30 dB

The difference between best and worst was 8.6% (5.4 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.56 kg/t Best $0
RefVredestein Ultrac+
7.93 kg/t +0.37 kg/t $14
8.14 kg/t +0.58 kg/t $23
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
8.23 kg/t +0.67 kg/t $26
8.38 kg/t +0.82 kg/t $32
8.43 kg/t +0.87 kg/t $34
9.04 kg/t +1.48 kg/t $58
10 kg/t +2.44 kg/t $95

The difference between best and worst was 32.3% (2.44 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons uses about 26 gal ($95) more fuel than the Dunlop All Season 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
29.8 → 3.1 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.