Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad
2024 Summer SUV Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 235/55 R19
- Tires tested
- 11
- Disciplines
- 14
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 110 ft | 0 ft | 4 mph | |
| 112 ft | +2 ft | 12 mph | |
| 113 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 113 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 115 ft | +5 ft | 17 mph | |
| 116 ft | +6 ft | 19 mph | |
| 116 ft | +6 ft | 19 mph | |
| 117 ft | +7 ft | 20 mph | |
| 119 ft | +9 ft | 22 mph | |
| 119 ft | +9 ft | 23 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 8.7% (9 ft ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Ceat Sport Drive SUV would still be travelling at 23 mph when the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed (100 - 0 )
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 67.5 mph | Best | |
| 67.1 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 66.8 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 66.7 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 66.7 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 66.2 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 66.2 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 66.1 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 66.1 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 66.1 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 66.1 mph | -1.4 mph |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 162 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 164 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 165 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 166 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 167 ft | +5 ft | 14 mph | |
| 170 ft | +8 ft | 17 mph | |
| 176 ft | +14 ft | 23 mph | |
| 177 ft | +15 ft | 23 mph | |
| 178 ft | +16 ft | 24 mph | |
| 185 ft | +23 ft | 29 mph | |
| 195 ft | +33 ft | 33 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 20.3% (33 ft ≈ 2.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Maxxis Victra Sport VS5 SUV would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 52.0 mph | Best | |
| 51.4 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 51.1 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 51.0 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 50.4 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 49.5 mph | -2.5 mph | |
| 48.7 mph | -3.3 mph | |
| 48.5 mph | -3.5 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (3.5 mph).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 20.36 s | Best | |
| 20.58 s | +0.22 s | |
| 20.81 s | +0.45 s | |
| 20.91 s | +0.55 s | |
| 20.92 s | +0.56 s | |
| 20.99 s | +0.63 s | |
| 21.23 s | +0.87 s | |
| 21.37 s | +1.01 s | |
| 21.38 s | +1.02 s | |
| 21.59 s | +1.23 s | |
| 21.75 s | +1.39 s |
The difference between best and worst was 6.8% (1.39 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 mph | Best | |
| 55.8 mph | -2.2 mph | |
| 55.3 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 55.2 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 55.1 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 54.2 mph | -3.8 mph | |
| 54.0 mph | -4.0 mph | |
| 54.0 mph | -4.0 mph | |
| 53.9 mph | -4.1 mph | |
| 53.7 mph | -4.3 mph | |
| 52.3 mph | -5.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 9.8% (5.7 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 ft/s² | Best | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 8.8 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 8.7 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 8.7 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 8.4 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 8.3 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 8.2 ft/s² | -0.8 ft/s² | |
| 7.8 ft/s² | -1.2 ft/s² | |
| 7.5 ft/s² | -1.5 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 16.1% (1.5 ft/s²).
Off road
5Gravel Handling
Gravel Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 55.1 mph | Best | |
| 54.3 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 54.2 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 54.2 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 54.1 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 54.1 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 53.8 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 53.7 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 53.5 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 53.3 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 53.2 mph | -1.9 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 3.5% (1.9 mph).
Gravel Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 1,840 lbf | Best | |
| 1,809 lbf | -31 lbf | |
| 1,778 lbf | -62 lbf | |
| 1,758 lbf | -82 lbf | |
| 1,744 lbf | -96 lbf | |
| 1,739 lbf | -101 lbf | |
| 1,728 lbf | -112 lbf | |
| 1,700 lbf | -140 lbf | |
| 1,692 lbf | -148 lbf | |
| 1,659 lbf | -181 lbf | |
| 1,608 lbf | -232 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 12.6% (232 lbf).
Sand Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2,479 lbf | Best | |
| 2,366 lbf | -113 lbf | |
| 2,346 lbf | -133 lbf | |
| 2,155 lbf | -324 lbf | |
| 2,135 lbf | -344 lbf | |
| 2,089 lbf | -390 lbf | |
| 2,069 lbf | -410 lbf | |
| 2,035 lbf | -444 lbf | |
| 1,956 lbf | -523 lbf | |
| 1,947 lbf | -532 lbf | |
| 1,935 lbf | -544 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 21.9% (544 lbf).
Grass Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 548 lbf | Best | |
| 498 lbf | -50 lbf | |
| 494 lbf | -54 lbf | |
| 453 lbf | -95 lbf | |
| 442 lbf | -106 lbf | |
| 433 lbf | -115 lbf | |
| 431 lbf | -117 lbf | |
| 412 lbf | -136 lbf | |
| 394 lbf | -154 lbf | |
| 385 lbf | -163 lbf | |
| 334 lbf | -214 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 39.1% (214 lbf).
Mud Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 557 lbf | Best | |
| 548 lbf | -9 lbf | |
| 543 lbf | -14 lbf | |
| 528 lbf | -29 lbf | |
| 525 lbf | -32 lbf | |
| 506 lbf | -51 lbf | |
| 504 lbf | -53 lbf | |
| 503 lbf | -54 lbf | |
| 493 lbf | -64 lbf | |
| 492 lbf | -65 lbf | |
| 472 lbf | -85 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 15.3% (85 lbf).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 68.6 dB | Best | |
| 69.2 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 69.9 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 70 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 70 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 70.3 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 70.4 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 70.8 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 71 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +3.30 dB | |
| 72.8 dB | +4.20 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 6.1% (4.2 dB).
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.2 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.63 kg/t | +0.43 kg/t | $18 | |
| 7.73 kg/t | +0.53 kg/t | $22 | |
| 7.73 kg/t | +0.53 kg/t | $22 | |
| 7.83 kg/t | +0.63 kg/t | $26 | |
| 8.15 kg/t | +0.95 kg/t | $39 | |
| 8.25 kg/t | +1.05 kg/t | $43 | |
| 8.44 kg/t | +1.24 kg/t | $51 | |
| 8.55 kg/t | +1.35 kg/t | $55 | |
| 8.85 kg/t | +1.65 kg/t | $67 | |
| 9.23 kg/t | +2.03 kg/t | $83 |
The difference between best and worst was 28.2% (2.03 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport uses about 23 gal ($83) more fuel than the Pirelli Scorpion.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tire Test
255/55 R1810 tires tested
4 of these 11 tires tested again
2026 Summer SUV Tire Test
255/45 R199 tires tested
3 of these 11 tires tested again
2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tire Test
235/55 R196 tires tested
3 of these 11 tires tested again

