Menu

2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tires VS UHP Tires

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
8 min read Updated

Adjust Result Weighting

The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system based on the test methodology. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.

Dry 30%
Wet 40%
Comfort 10%
Value 20%
Dry 30% · Wet 40% · Comfort 10% · Value 20%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet
Comfort
Value

Test Results Data

BEST Good Average Below Average
# Tire Total Score Dry Wet Comfort Value
Braking M Handling Km/H % Braking M Handling Km/H Circle m/s Straight Aqua Km/H Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 % Noise dB % Price Rolling Resistance kg / t Energy Consumption kWh/100km %
1 ▲3 Falken e.Ziex 98.4% 34.3 3 90.3 98.8% 24 2 49.4 8.41 81.3 7.2 96.8% 71.9 100% 252 5.7 13.2 99.7%
2 ▲1 Michelin e.Primacy 97.8% 34.9 89.5 97.6% 23.9 49.8 8.46 81.8 7.68 97.6% 71.9 100% 371 5.9 2 13.4 3 97.1%
3 ▲6 Pirelli Scorpion Elect 95.8% 36.6 88.8 94.9% 24.6 49.1 8.38 83.2 8.09 96.1% 71.9 100% 308 6.4 3 13.2 94.2%
4 ▼3 Continental SportContact 7 95.8% 34.1 91.9 100% 24.3 50.4 8.72 2 83.3 2 8.8 3 98.1% 73 98.5% 285 7.2 15 83.4%
5 ▼3 Continental Premium Contact 6 94.7% 34.1 90 99% 24.7 50 8.58 81.8 8 96.4% 72.1 99.7% 213 3 7.4 15 82.5%
6 ▲1 Falken Azenis FK520 94.6% 34.9 90.8 3 98.3% 24.2 3 49.6 8.52 82.6 8.06 97.2% 73.4 98% 216 7.6 14.7 82.4%
7 ▼1 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 94.2% 34.9 89.9 97.8% 24.3 50.5 3 8.69 3 83.8 8.93 2 98.3% 73 98.5% 400 8 15.3 78.4%
8 Maxxis Victra Sport VS5 SUV 92.7% 35.5 89.9 96.9% 25 50.8 2 8.69 3 83.3 2 8.45 96.7% 72.9 98.6% 177 8.8 15.3 75.8%
9 ▲1 GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV 92.4% 35.8 89.6 96.4% 26.9 49.9 8.44 83.2 8.77 92.9% 72.9 98.6% 198 2 7.7 14.6 82.3%
10 ▼5 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 92% 34.9 90.9 2 98.3% 26 51.6 8.97 82.2 9.14 95.8% 73.5 97.8% 304 9.1 16.1 72.2%
Scroll for more
1
98.4%
Dry 99% Wet 97% Comfort 100% Value 100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.3 M 3
Dry Handling 90.3 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 24 M 2
Wet Handling 49.4 Km/H
Wet Circle 8.41 m/s
Straight Aqua 81.3 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 7.2 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 71.9 dB
Value
Price 252
Rolling Resistance 5.7 kg / t
Energy Consumption 13.2 kWh/100km
2
97.8%
Dry 98% Wet 98% Comfort 100% Value 97%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.9 M
Dry Handling 89.5 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 23.9 M
Wet Handling 49.8 Km/H
Wet Circle 8.46 m/s
Straight Aqua 81.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 7.68 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 71.9 dB
Value
Price 371
Rolling Resistance 5.9 kg / t 2
Energy Consumption 13.4 kWh/100km 3
3
95.8%
Dry 95% Wet 96% Comfort 100% Value 94%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.6 M
Dry Handling 88.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 24.6 M
Wet Handling 49.1 Km/H
Wet Circle 8.38 m/s
Straight Aqua 83.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 8.09 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 71.9 dB
Value
Price 308
Rolling Resistance 6.4 kg / t 3
Energy Consumption 13.2 kWh/100km
Dry 100% Wet 98% Comfort 99% Value 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.1 M
Dry Handling 91.9 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 24.3 M
Wet Handling 50.4 Km/H
Wet Circle 8.72 m/s 2
Straight Aqua 83.3 Km/H 2
Curved Aquaplaning 8.8 m/sec2 3
Comfort
Noise 73 dB
Value
Price 285
Rolling Resistance 7.2 kg / t
Energy Consumption 15 kWh/100km
Dry 99% Wet 96% Comfort 100% Value 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.1 M
Dry Handling 90 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 24.7 M
Wet Handling 50 Km/H
Wet Circle 8.58 m/s
Straight Aqua 81.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 8 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 72.1 dB
Value
Price 213 3
Rolling Resistance 7.4 kg / t
Energy Consumption 15 kWh/100km
6
94.6%
Dry 98% Wet 97% Comfort 98% Value 82%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.9 M
Dry Handling 90.8 Km/H 3
Wet
Wet Braking 24.2 M 3
Wet Handling 49.6 Km/H
Wet Circle 8.52 m/s
Straight Aqua 82.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 8.06 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 73.4 dB
Value
Price 216
Rolling Resistance 7.6 kg / t
Energy Consumption 14.7 kWh/100km
Dry 98% Wet 98% Comfort 99% Value 78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.9 M
Dry Handling 89.9 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 24.3 M
Wet Handling 50.5 Km/H 3
Wet Circle 8.69 m/s 3
Straight Aqua 83.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 8.93 m/sec2 2
Comfort
Noise 73 dB
Value
Price 400
Rolling Resistance 8 kg / t
Energy Consumption 15.3 kWh/100km
Dry 97% Wet 97% Comfort 99% Value 76%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.5 M
Dry Handling 89.9 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 25 M
Wet Handling 50.8 Km/H 2
Wet Circle 8.69 m/s 3
Straight Aqua 83.3 Km/H 2
Curved Aquaplaning 8.45 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 72.9 dB
Value
Price 177
Rolling Resistance 8.8 kg / t
Energy Consumption 15.3 kWh/100km
Dry 96% Wet 93% Comfort 99% Value 82%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.8 M
Dry Handling 89.6 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 26.9 M
Wet Handling 49.9 Km/H
Wet Circle 8.44 m/s
Straight Aqua 83.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 8.77 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 72.9 dB
Value
Price 198 2
Rolling Resistance 7.7 kg / t
Energy Consumption 14.6 kWh/100km
Dry 98% Wet 96% Comfort 98% Value 72%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.9 M
Dry Handling 90.9 Km/H 2
Wet
Wet Braking 26 M
Wet Handling 51.6 Km/H
Wet Circle 8.97 m/s
Straight Aqua 82.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 9.14 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 73.5 dB
Value
Price 304
Rolling Resistance 9.1 kg / t
Energy Consumption 16.1 kWh/100km
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tires based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tire's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tire moves when your custom weighting is applied.
comments powered by Disqus