Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2020 AutoBild Van All Season Commercial Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
235/65 R16
Tires tested
8
Disciplines
11

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
138 ft -9 ft
147 ft Best
149 ft +2 ft
158 ft +11 ft
159 ft +12 ft
163 ft +16 ft
164 ft +17 ft
164 ft +17 ft
166 ft +19 ft
RefReference Winter
172 ft +25 ft

The difference between best and worst was 24.4% (34 ft ≈ 2.3 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
37.2 mph +0.2 mph
37.0 mph Best
37.0 mph Best
36.8 mph -0.2 mph
36.8 mph -0.2 mph
36.6 mph -0.4 mph
36.5 mph -0.5 mph
36.5 mph -0.5 mph
36.1 mph -0.9 mph
RefReference Winter
36.0 mph -1.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (1.2 mph).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
162 ft -8 ft
170 ft Best
178 ft +8 ft
180 ft +10 ft
182 ft +12 ft
183 ft +13 ft
190 ft +20 ft
190 ft +20 ft
190 ft +20 ft
RefReference Winter
204 ft +34 ft

The difference between best and worst was 25.7% (42 ft ≈ 2.8 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
42.6 mph 0.0 mph
42.6 mph Best
42.4 mph -0.2 mph
42.3 mph -0.3 mph
42.3 mph -0.3 mph
41.8 mph -0.8 mph
41.8 mph -0.8 mph
41.4 mph -1.2 mph
RefReference Winter
41.3 mph -1.3 mph
40.6 mph -2.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.8% (2 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
58.7 mph Best
RefReference Summer
58.2 mph -0.5 mph
57.9 mph -0.8 mph
57.7 mph -1.0 mph
57.5 mph -1.2 mph
56.5 mph -2.2 mph
56.5 mph -2.2 mph
RefReference Winter
55.9 mph -2.8 mph
55.9 mph -2.8 mph
55.9 mph -2.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.9% (2.8 mph).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
80 ft -1 ft
81 ft Best
81 ft Best
83 ft +2 ft
84 ft +3 ft
86 ft +5 ft
87 ft +6 ft
98 ft +17 ft
99 ft +18 ft

The difference between best and worst was 24.3% (19 ft ≈ 1.3 Car Lengths).

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
1,003 lbf Best
991 lbf -12 lbf
RefReference Winter
978 lbf -25 lbf
971 lbf -32 lbf
928 lbf -75 lbf
925 lbf -78 lbf
906 lbf -97 lbf
868 lbf -135 lbf
863 lbf -140 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 13.9% (140 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
28.1 mph +0.1 mph
28.0 mph Best
28.0 mph 0.0 mph
27.9 mph -0.1 mph
27.8 mph -0.2 mph
27.7 mph -0.3 mph
27.5 mph -0.5 mph
27.5 mph -0.5 mph
27.3 mph -0.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.1% (0.8 mph).

Comfort

2

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
70.5 dB Best
RefReference Summer
71 dB +0.50 dB
71 dB +0.50 dB
71.6 dB +1.10 dB
72.3 dB +1.80 dB
72.4 dB +1.90 dB
72.5 dB +2.00 dB
72.5 dB +2.00 dB
RefReference Winter
74.7 dB +4.20 dB
74.7 dB +4.20 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6% (4.2 dB).

Tire Weight

Tire Weight Per Set

Lower is better ↓
Tire Weight
Position / TireResultGap to best
123.5 lb Best
130.5 lb +7.0 lb
134.0 lb +10.5 lb
135.8 lb +12.3 lb
135.8 lb +12.3 lb
143.7 lb +20.2 lb
145.5 lb +22.0 lb
148.2 lb +24.7 lb

The difference between best and worst was 20% (24.7 lb).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.36 kg/t Best $0
6.8 kg/t +0.44 kg/t $20
RefReference Winter
6.8 kg/t +0.44 kg/t $20
6.84 kg/t +0.48 kg/t $22
6.9 kg/t +0.54 kg/t $25
RefReference Summer
6.98 kg/t +0.62 kg/t $29
7.21 kg/t +0.85 kg/t $39
7.22 kg/t +0.86 kg/t $40
7.23 kg/t +0.87 kg/t $40
7.4 kg/t +1.04 kg/t $48

The difference between best and worst was 16.4% (1.04 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Vredestein Comtrac 2 All Season uses about 13 gal ($48) more fuel than the Continental VanContact 4Season.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.