Menu

Premium VS Budget Winter Tires

Jonathan Benson
Tested and written by Jonathan Benson
2 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Testing Methodology
    1. Categories Tested
  3. Dry
  4. Wet
  5. Snow
  6. Results
  7. Nokian WR Snowproof
  8. Tristar SnowPower 2

Testing Methodology

Test Driver
Jonathan Benson
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Test Location
Professional Proving Ground
Test Year
2019
Tires Tested
2
Show full testing methodology Hide methodology

Every tire is tested using calibrated instrumented measurement and structured subjective assessment. Reference tires are retested throughout each session to correct for changing conditions, ensuring fair, repeatable comparisons. Multiple reference sets are used where needed so that control tire wear does not affect accuracy.

We use professional-grade testing equipment including GPS data loggers, accelerometers, and calibrated microphones. All tires are broken in and conditioned before testing begins. For full details on our equipment, preparation process, and calibration procedures, see our complete testing methodology.

Categories Tested

Dry Braking

For dry braking, I drive the test vehicle at an entry speed of 110 km/h and apply full braking effort to a standstill with ABS active on clean, dry asphalt. I typically use an 100–5 km/h measurement window. My standard programme is five runs per tire set where possible, although the sequence can extend to as many as fifteen runs if conditions and tire category justify it. I analyse the full set of runs and discard statistical outliers before averaging. Reference tires are run repeatedly throughout the session to correct for changing conditions.

Dry Handling

For dry handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated handling circuit with ESC disabled where possible so I can assess the tire's natural balance, transient response, and limit behaviour without electronic intervention masking the result. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tire set, depending on the circuit, tire type, and consistency of conditions. I exclude laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Control runs are carried out frequently throughout the session, and I often use multiple sets of control tires so that wear on the references does not become a meaningful variable. For more track-focused products, I also do endurance testing, which is a set number of laps at race pace to determine tire wear patterns and heat resistance over longer driving.

Wet Braking

For wet braking, I drive the test vehicle at an entry speed of 88 km/h and apply full braking effort to a standstill with ABS active on an asphalt surface with a controlled water film. I typically use an 80–5 km/h measurement window to isolate tire performance from variability in the initial brake application. My standard programme is eight runs per tire set where possible, although the sequence can extend to as many as fifteen runs if conditions and tire category justify it. I analyse the full set of runs and discard statistical outliers before averaging. To correct for changing conditions, I run reference tires repeatedly throughout the session — in wet testing, typically every three candidate test sets.

Wet Handling

For wet handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated handling circuit. I generally use specialist wet circuits with kerb-watering systems designed to maintain a consistent surface condition. ESC is disabled where possible so I can assess the tire's natural balance, transient response, and limit behaviour without electronic intervention masking the result. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tire set, depending on the circuit, tire type, and consistency of conditions. I exclude laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Control runs are carried out frequently throughout the session, and I often use multiple sets of control tires so that wear on the references does not become a meaningful variable.

Snow Braking

For snow braking, I drive the test vehicle at an entry speed of 50 km/h and apply full braking effort to a standstill with ABS active on a groomed, compacted snow surface, measuring 45-5 km/h. I generally use a wide VDA (vehicle dynamic area) and progressively move across the surface between runs so that no tire ever brakes on the same piece of snow twice. My standard programme is twelve runs per tire set, although the sequence can extend further if the data justify it. I analyse the full set of runs and discard statistical outliers before averaging. The surface is regularly groomed throughout the session. To correct for changing snow surface conditions, I run reference tires repeatedly — typically every two candidate test sets.

Snow Handling

For snow handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated snow handling circuit with ESC disabled where possible. The circuit is groomed and prepared after every run while tires are being changed, so each set runs on a consistently prepared surface. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tire set, excluding laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Because snow surfaces degrade more rapidly than asphalt, control runs are carried out more frequently — typically every two candidate test sets.

Score Weighting Hide Score Weighting

How each category is weighted in the overall score:

Dry 24%
Dry Braking 50%
Dry Handling 50%
Wet 41%
Wet Braking 50%
Wet Handling 50%
Snow 35%
Snow Braking 46%
Snow Handling 54%
Are cheap winter tires safe? To find out, we travelled to Finland, twice, to do snow, ice, wet and dry testing.

All tests were done using two cars, a VW Golf wearing 205/55 R16 tires, and a heavier, larger Volvo S90 fitted with 245/45 R18 tires.

To see how the testing went, watch the video below!

Dry

Dry Braking

Spread: 0.13 M (0.5%)|Avg: 28.81 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Tristar SnowPower 2
    28.74 M
  2. Nokian WR Snowproof
    28.87 M

Dry Handling

Spread: 0.30 s (0.6%)|Avg: 51.42 s
Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian WR Snowproof
    51.27 s
  2. Tristar SnowPower 2
    51.57 s

Wet

Wet Braking

Spread: 3.51 M (11.1%)|Avg: 33.52 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian WR Snowproof
    31.76 M
  2. Tristar SnowPower 2
    35.27 M

Wet Handling

Spread: 0.60 s (1.6%)|Avg: 37.90 s
Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian WR Snowproof
    37.60 s
  2. Tristar SnowPower 2
    38.20 s

Snow

Snow Braking

Spread: 7.90 M (21.9%)|Avg: 39.95 M
Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian WR Snowproof
    36.00 M
  2. Tristar SnowPower 2
    43.90 M

Snow Handling

Spread: 7.30 s (7.5%)|Avg: 100.85 s
Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian WR Snowproof
    97.20 s
  2. Tristar SnowPower 2
    104.50 s

Results

1st

Nokian WR Snowproof

205/55 R16
Nokian WR Snowproof
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 2nd 28.87 M 28.74 M +0.13 M 99.55%
Dry Handling 1st 51.27 s 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 1st 31.76 M 100%
Wet Handling 1st 37.6 s 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 1st 36 M 100%
Snow Handling 1st 97.2 s 100%
2nd

Tristar SnowPower 2

205/55 R16
Tristar SnowPower 2
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 1st 28.74 M 100%
Dry Handling 2nd 51.57 s 51.27 s +0.3 s 99.42%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 2nd 35.27 M 31.76 M +3.51 M 90.05%
Wet Handling 2nd 38.2 s 37.6 s +0.6 s 98.43%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Snow Braking 2nd 43.9 M 36 M +7.9 M 82%
Snow Handling 2nd 104.5 s 97.2 s +7.3 s 93.01%

Discussion

16 comments
  1. Marko Martinović archived

    It will be interesting to compare a premium and budget winter tires after 15 000 to kilometers to see wich tires keep better preformance during the tires wear.

    #5510
  2. Dare archived

    Hello Jonathan. I really enjoy your videos. You helped me understand so much about tire. Right now I want to buy good all season tires. I am going to buy VW Polo 1.4 TDI 2006, and it has a strange tire size. 185/60/14 I think. And I am also limited by budget. I live in Serbia in southern parts and we have per average 37 snow days, and thats nothing. Sometimes we get 20 snow days. Most of the time its just dry. So the tire need to be only good in dry and hot, becouse we can get a pretty hot summer sometimes. Right now I am looking at Fulda MultiControl 52e and Kleber Quadraxer 2 49e.
    I want a nice riding, comfortable, low noise with good fuel economy tire that will survive summer.
    Are there any other choices exept these? I will pay more for the right tire but for a right price.

    #5381
    1. TireReviews Dare archived

      The CrossClimate is the master of dry performance in the all season category, all the rest can only be described as average at the moment. The Bridgestone A005 looks to be very good in braking but has high wear.

      #5392
      1. Dare TireReviews archived

        How about Conti Allseasoncontact rr Vredestein Quatrac 5 ? I cant find CrossClimate Plus version in 14' size. They only sell regular version. Is it a still good choice?

        #5394
        1. TireReviews Dare archived

          The regular CrossClimate is still a great choice, they didn't change much for the + version

          #5400
  3. Mark archived

    Hey TireReviews, I would love to see a test on the Michellin CrossClimate+ vs UHP Summer, vs UHP Winter Vs Budget Summer in the wet and dry in say 10 degree ish heat (plus or minis a bit). If it performs well at these temps (considering the mild UK winters we've been having) it could actually just be the best UK tire for most of the time.

    #5369
    1. TireReviews Mark archived

      Something like that in the works at the moment

      #5370
  4. FritzHatezYouAll archived

    Expected a bigger difference, interresting test.

    #5354
  5. Yo doge archived

    Awesome video, as always.
    And I have one question.
    I live in south east europe and we very rarely have snow here but temps are low and it rains pretty often. Should i buy winter or all season or all weather tires for conditions like these?

    #5351
    1. TireReviews Yo doge archived

      Mild winter, buy all seasons, wow.

      #5352
  6. Bill Hartman archived

    Very informative video/post, thank you for taking the time to do it. It convinced me to not go cheap on winter tires despite the short season where I live. I do have a follow up question if you have time.

    I have a Tesla Model 3 with dual motor/AWD, How much difference in dry, wet, and snow/ice would there be between a "studless ice/snow" tire and a "performance winter/snow" tire? Looking at the difference between the Michelin X-Ice Xi3 and Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3. So how much worse in wet/dry is the X-Ice? And how much worse in the snow/ice is the Sottozero?

    Where I live it rains a lot and low temps are in the 34f/2c - 41f/5c range. We only get snow once or twice during the winter, but I do drive through snowy passes a few times a month so I don't want to have sub-optimal snow/ice ability. Thank you!

    #5347
  7. jayfou archived

    Another great video! Just to add - the Golf starts around 1,400 kg, the Volvo around 1,800 kg, depending mainly on the engine and gearbox.

    #5340