Michelin X Ice Snow vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
- TR Score
- 7.9/10
- Owners say
- 85% · 19
- TR Score
- 8.8/10
- Owners say
- 75% · 10
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 finished ahead 1 times and the X Ice Snow not once. The Hakkapeliitta 10 stopped 21.8% shorter on ice.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Pick Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 if you routinely drive on ice-packed or hard snow (rural routes, unplowed roads, prolonged sub-zero conditions) and can accept stud noise, higher consumption, and comfort trade-offs-also verify stud legality in your region. Choose Michelin X Ice Snow if your winters mix slush, wet, and dry pavement with occasional snow/ice; you'll get quieter cruising, lower fuel use, better aquaplaning safety, and solid all-round winter capability at a friendlier price.
Where the X Ice Snow is stronger
- Exceptional comfort and low noise (10/10 noise and damping; consistently top subjective noise scores)
- Lower rolling resistance and better fuel economy (e.g., 5.726 vs 5.946 l/100km; best RR in 2022 test)
- Strong aquaplaning resistance (e.g., 62 vs 57.6 km/h straight-line aqua)
Where the Hakkapeliitta 10 is stronger
- Class-leading ice and snow traction/braking (multiple double-digit advantages; perfect 80/80 winter grip in 2025)
- Predictable, confident behavior on extreme slipperiness with precise steering feel on ice
- Consistently strong winter-surface lap times and subjective control in snow/ice
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
X Ice Snow vs Hakkapeliitta 10 at a glance
| Category | X Ice Snow | Gap | Hakkapeliitta 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won4 shared tests | 0 | 1 | |
| Dry3 measurements | 1 | 2 | |
| Wet7 measurements | 2 | The Hakkapeliitta 10 stopped 4.9% shorter in the wet (2 tests) | 5 |
| Snow6 measurements | 1 | The Hakkapeliitta 10 was 0.8% quicker in the snow traction test (2 tests) | 4 |
| Ice6 measurements | 0 | The Hakkapeliitta 10 stopped 21.8% shorter on ice (2 tests) | 6 |
| Comfort3 measurements | 3 | 0 | |
| Value1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 7.9/10 | The Hakkapeliitta 10 by 0.9 | 8.8/10 |
| Owner rating19 and 10 reviews | 85% | The X Ice Snow by 10 points | 75% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 88% | The X Ice Snow by 18 points | 70% |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Hakkapeliitta 10 was dearer in 2 of 2 | +9.2% |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2021 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | X Ice Snow | Field | Hakkapeliitta 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tire Test | P4 of 7Nordic Friction Winter Tires | P2 of 8Studded Winter Tires | |
| 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tire Test | P6 of 7Nordic Friction Winter Tires | P1 of 7Studded Winter Tires | |
| The Best Studded / Friction Winter Tires for 2024 | P5 of 6Nordic Friction Winter Tires | P2 of 6Studded Winter Tires | |
| 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tire Test | P4 of 6Nordic Friction Winter Tires | P1 of 9Studded Winter Tires |
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
X Ice Snow
Hakkapeliitta 10
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 8 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
X Ice Snow
Hakkapeliitta 10
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
X Ice Snow
Hakkapeliitta 10
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the X Ice Snow 85% from 19 reviews and the Hakkapeliitta 10 75% from 10. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | X Ice Snow | Gap | Hakkapeliitta 10 | Wins | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 104 | 0.1% | 105 | 1-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 14.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 127 | 4.9% | 120 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 38.65 | 0.6% | 38.4 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 2.9% | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 38.5 | 7.6% | 35.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 168 | 0.4% | 167 | 1-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 6 | 0.8% | 5.95 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 53.6 | 0.6% | 53.3 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 25% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 148 | 21.8% | 115 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 6 | 30.1% | 4.2 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 68.6 | 21.1% | 54.1 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 66.7% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 100% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 35.7% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 5.73 | 3.7% | 5.95 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the X Ice Snow scores 7.9 and the Hakkapeliitta 10 8.8 out of 10.
| X Ice Snow | Category | Hakkapeliitta 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Dry | 36 | ||
| 28 | Wet | 22 | ||
| 53 | Comfort | 47 | ||
| 64 | Value | 61 | ||
| 61 | Snow | 86 | ||
| 79 | Ice | 89 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| X Ice Snow | Category | Hakkapeliitta 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.8 | Dry Grip | 7.3 | ||
| 7.9 | Wet Grip | 7.1 | ||
| 7.6 | Road Feedback | 6.5 | ||
| 7.5 | Handling | 7.8 | ||
| 9 | Wear | 7.4 | ||
| 8.8 | Comfort | 6.3 | ||
| 9.4 | Snow Grip | 9.2 | ||
| 8.6 | Ice Grip | 8.8 | ||
Owners rate the X Ice Snow 85% from 19 reviews and the Hakkapeliitta 10 75% from 10. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Michelin X Ice Snow
- 85%from 19 reviews
- 88%would buy again
- 250,466 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers describe the Michelin X-Ice Snow as a confidence-inspiring winter tire with standout traction in snow and strong overall control in mixed winter conditions (slush, packed snow, and typical ice), often noting predictable handling and good braking. Many also report good comfort and low wear over multiple winters, making it a popular choice for harsh climates and long winter commutes. A smaller subset mentions that road noise can be higher than expected (or increases with wear) and that grip on smooth/glare/black ice can feel weaker than studded options or some prior winter tires.
- Excellent traction and mobility in deep snow
- Strong winter grip and confidence in mixed conditions (slush/packed snow)
- Predictable handling with good lateral stability
- Good comfort and generally quiet ride for a winter tire
- Road noise can be higher than expected or increase as the tire wears
- Ice grip on smooth/glare/black ice can feel weaker than studded tires or some competing/prior winter tires
- Dry/wet road performance is only average compared with non-winter tires
Summarised by AI from 16 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 19 X Ice Snow reviewsHad these on our Corolla for the last 5 winters and they have performed great. Wear is minimal, although we only have 15,000mi on them. We get surprisingly good gas mileage (37-40mpg). Snow performance is amazing. Even in the wet, sloppy snow/slush, they performed great. Changing lanes in these conditions and not getting pulled around is very confidence-inspiring. Ice performance is very good as well. Had one small slip on some black ice in a corner on an on-ramp, but other than that they have been great in the winter.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
- 75%from 10 reviews
- 70%would buy again
- 83,700 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers generally describe the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 as a top-tier studded winter tire, delivering outstanding traction and confidence on hard-packed snow and ice, with several owners calling it “bulletproof” in harsh conditions. The most consistent drawback is noticeable road noise on dry pavement, and multiple users also report weaker dry/wet handling feel or wet braking compared with premium studless alternatives. A smaller subset report that winter performance can drop off markedly after 2-3 seasons/around 20k miles despite remaining tread, which hurts perceived value for some.
- Exceptional snow and ice traction (braking, acceleration, cornering)
- High confidence and stability in severe winter conditions
- Strong performance in deep snow vs studless competitors
- Good tread life/low wear reported by several owners
- Noticeable road noise/“racket” on dry pavement (typical of studded tires)
- Dry/wet handling feel and wet braking not as strong as some premium alternatives (less feedback, can feel wobbly)
Summarised by AI from 9 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 10 Hakkapeliitta 10 reviewsBought these for northeast winter and 2025/26 was a bear (2023 CX-5). I travel over High Point mountain NJ up and down and Wurtsboro mountain NY up in morn down at end of day daily over 40 miles one way (look them up, not fun). NJ does a great job clearing the roads NY O boy not so much. These were bullet proof unplowed NY roads no problem up the mountains and down I drank my coffee calmly. Held the track on one lane each way country road unplowed while crazy trailer driver flying in from the other way (had me checking my life ins. in my head) but no problem the Hakka's and CX-5 just did their thing despite his stupidity. Never a slip never a slit slide never a wheel spin. My buddies and I refer to them as the beasts, loud in the dry yea couples miles less MPH (2) yup , who cares!
Bought a set of sharp alloy rims for them to boot no tire changes, bad for your tires.My one friend going to take them for 400 USD (a gift after one season) and I am going for the Hakka 01 with new retractable stud tech, we shall see........yes I am a rubber head I have tire problem!
Sizes, EU label and lineage
| Category | X Ice Snow | Hakkapeliitta 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| On the market since | 2020 | - |
| Replaced | Michelin X Ice Xi3 (2011) | Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 |
| Replaced by | Michelin X Ice Snow+ | Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 |
| Price in the shared tests | The Hakkapeliitta 10 was the dearer tire in 2 of the 2 tests that listed prices, by 9.2% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This matchup pits two Nordic-focused winter tires with very different philosophies: the studless Michelin X Ice Snow versus the studded Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10. Across six shared tests from 2021-2025 and multiple sizes, the Nokian repeatedly asserts dominance on pure winter surfaces, while the Michelin prioritizes refinement, efficiency, and everyday usability on mixed winter roads.
The headline contrast is clear in the scoring: Nokian takes four overall test wins to Michelin's two, driven by emphatic ice and snow traction/braking advantages. Michelin counters with best-in-class comfort, low noise, better rolling resistance and fuel consumption, and stronger aquaplaning resistance-attributes that matter when roads are often wet, slushy, or dry rather than purely frozen.
Conclusion
If your winter reality is frequent ice and packed snow, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 is the benchmark. It delivered flawless 80/80 winter-grip points in one 2025 test and routinely outbraked and out-accelerated the Michelin on ice by double-digit percentages (e.g., −25% to −30% in ice braking/traction). The trade-offs are familiar for a studded tire: louder, less comfortable, higher rolling resistance, and weaker aquaplaning and asphalt precision.
For mixed winter use with long stretches of clear, wet, or slushy tarmac, the Michelin X Ice Snow makes a compelling case. It is markedly quieter and more comfortable, shows better aquaplaning resistance (e.g., 62 vs 57.6 km/h), lower fuel consumption, and lower rolling resistance, and it's typically cheaper. However, its ice grip lags the Nokian meaningfully in most recent tests, and dry/wet braking/handling can be middling in newer results. In short: choose Nokian for maximum frozen-road security; choose Michelin for everyday comfort and efficiency where ice is occasional and road noise matters.
X Ice Snow vs Hakkapeliitta 10: your questions
Is the Michelin X Ice Snow or the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 the better tire?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 finished ahead 1 times and the X Ice Snow not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the X Ice Snow scores 7.9 and the Hakkapeliitta 10 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the X Ice Snow or the Hakkapeliitta 10?
The Hakkapeliitta 10 led 5 of the 7 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.9% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Hakkapeliitta 10 led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Hakkapeliitta 10 led 4 of the 6 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it was 0.8% quicker in the snow traction test across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.8/10 for the X Ice Snow and 6.3/10 for the Hakkapeliitta 10.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the X Ice Snow 85% from 19 reviews and the Hakkapeliitta 10 75% from 10. 88% of X Ice Snow owners would buy it again, against 70% for the Hakkapeliitta 10.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Hakkapeliitta 10 was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 9.2% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Continental VikingContact 8 vs Michelin X Ice Snow
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Michelin X Ice Snow vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
0-6 in 8 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak Ice vs Michelin X Ice Snow
0-3 in 3 shared tests
vs
Michelin X Ice North 4 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Michelin X Ice Snow vs Pirelli Ice Zero FR
3-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
2-2 in 6 shared tests
vs
Continental VikingContact 7 vs Michelin X Ice Snow
5-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Michelin X Ice Snow
7-0 in 7 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion