Menu

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

This head-to-head pits Nokian's flagship studded winter tire, the Hakkapeliitta 10, against its Nordic friction counterpart, the Hakkapeliitta R5. Both target premium-touring winter use on passenger cars, but they approach grip very differently: the Hakka 10 leans on studs for maximum ice security, while the R5 prioritizes refinement, rolling efficiency and all-round road manners without studs.
Across six shared tests, a clear pattern emerges. The Hakkapeliitta 10 repeatedly crushes ice metrics (often by 25-45% in braking and traction) and is consistently strong on snow, while the R5 counters with better dry/wet road behavior, comfort, and fuel efficiency. Overall placings reflect this trade: the studded Hakka 10 takes more overall wins and higher winter scores, but the R5 is frequently the nicer tire to live with on bare pavement.
Hakkapeliitta-10 VS Hakkapeliitta-R5

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of six total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10four
four wins
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5two
two wins

While it might look like the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 is better than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Dominant ice braking and traction (often 25-45% advantage)
  • Consistently strong snow braking and stability
  • Improved wet braking versus past studded generations
  • High confidence on extreme winter surfaces with predictable handling
  • Better dry braking and more precise on-road manners
  • Competitive wet handling with lower noise and higher comfort
  • Lower rolling resistance and typically better fuel consumption
  • Good snow performance with stable, easy-to-drive balance

Dry Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 stopped the vehicle in 4.91% less distance than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
32.77M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
31.16M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
33.14M (+1.62M)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
31.52M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
32.4M (+1.6M)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
30.8M

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from zero tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 performed equally well in dry handling [s] tests.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
0s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
0s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Both tires performed equally well

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 performed equally well in subj. dry handling tests.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
5.5 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
5.5 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Both tires performed equally well

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
3 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
2 Points (-1 Points)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
8 Points (-1 Points)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
9 Points

Wet Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 stopped the vehicle in 2.33% less distance than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
37.26M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
38.15M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
37.22M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
38.39M (+1.17M)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
37.3M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
37.9M (+0.6M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was 1.08% faster around a wet lap than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
41.7s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
41.25s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
41.9s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
41.9s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
41.5s (+0.9s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
40.6s

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 scored 7.14% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
6.5 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
7 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
8 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
8 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
5 Points (-1 Points)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
6 Points

Wet Circle

Looking at data from zero tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 performed equally well in wet circle tests.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
0s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
0s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Both tires performed equally well

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 floated at a 5.22% higher speed than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
60.3Km/H
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
57.15Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
63Km/H
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
58.6Km/H (-4.4Km/H)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
57.6Km/H
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
55.7Km/H (-1.9Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from zero tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 performed equally well in curved aquaplaning tests.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
0m/sec2
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
0m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Both tires performed equally well

Snow Braking

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one snow braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 stopped the vehicle in 0.55% less distance than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
23.68M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
23.55M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
15.5M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
15.51M (+0.01M)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
12.41M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
12.5M (+0.09M)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
16.51M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
16.67M (+0.16M)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
50.3M (+0.8M)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
49.5M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 accelerated 0.21% faster than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
4.69s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
4.7s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
5.64s (+0.09s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
5.55s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
4.32s (+0.22s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
4.1s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
2.79s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
3.13s (+0.34s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
6s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
6s

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was 0.14% faster around a lap than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
81.46s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
81.35s
Snow handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
87.73s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
87.8s (+0.07s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
75.2s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
75.6s (+0.4s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
81.44s (+0.8s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
80.64s

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 performed equally well in subj. snow handling tests.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
41.67 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
41.67 Points
Subjective Snow Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Both tires performed equally well

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
95 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
95 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
10 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
10 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
20 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
20 Points

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 0.28% faster around a snow circle than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
28.9S
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
28.98S
Snow Circle Time in Seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Circle: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
28.9S
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
28.98S (+0.08S)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 10.96% faster through a slalom than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
3.65m/sec2
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
3.25m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
3.65m/sec2
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
3.25m/sec2 (-0.4m/sec2)

Ice Braking

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during four ice braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 stopped the vehicle 29.54% shorter than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
14.86M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
21.09M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
7.7M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
10.18M (+2.48M)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
11.73M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
17.87M (+6.14M)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
6.1M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
8.41M (+2.31M)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
33.9M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
47.9M (+14M)

Ice Traction

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during four ice traction tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 accelerated 39.7% faster than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
4.48s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
7.43s
Ice acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Ice Traction: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
3.23s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
6.06s (+2.83s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
5.38s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
9.42s (+4.04s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
4.49s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
7.54s (+3.05s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
4.8s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
6.7s (+1.9s)

Ice Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during two ice handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was 2.87% faster around a lap than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
53.63s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
52.09s
Ice handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Ice Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
54.33s (+0.83s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
53.5s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
47.8s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
48s (+0.2s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
58.77s (+4.01s)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
54.76s

Subj. Ice Handling

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one subj. ice handling tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 scored 0.82% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
40 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
39.67 Points
Subjective Ice Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Ice Handling: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
90 Points (-5 Points)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
95 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
10 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
10 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
20 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
14 Points (-6 Points)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 scored 16.67% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
5 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
6 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
5 Points (-1 Points)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
6 Points

Subj. Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 scored 30% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
7 Points
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
10 Points
Subjective in car noise levels, higher is better

Best In Subj. Noise: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
7 Points (-3 Points)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
10 Points

Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one noise tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 measured 5.3% quieter than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
75.5dB
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
71.5dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
75.5dB (+4dB)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
71.5dB

Noise

Looking at data from zero tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 performed equally well in noise tests.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
0dB
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
0dB
Internal noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Both tires performed equally well

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 had a 11.46% lower rolling resistance than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
8.29kg / t
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
7.34kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
8.29kg / t (+0.95kg / t)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
7.34kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 used 3.65% less fuel than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
5.75l/100km
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
5.54l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
5.55l/100km (+0.3l/100km)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
5.25l/100km
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
5.946l/100km (+0.13l/100km)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
5.82l/100km

Real World Driver Reviews

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 Driver Reviews

Most drivers rate the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 highly for outstanding grip and control on ice, hard-packed snow, and deep snow, delivering strong winter confidence and safety. Several high-scoring reviews also note minimal wear over time. However, some users report intrusive road noise on pavement and average feel/feedback on dry/wet roads, and a couple of mid-scoring reviews cite notable performance decline after 2 seasons or ~20k miles. Overall sentiment is positive, with winter traction as the standout strength.

Based on 9 reviews with an average rating of 75%

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 Driver Reviews

Drivers largely praise the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 for exceptional winter capability, with standout grip and braking on snow and strong confidence on ice, plus a very quiet and comfortable ride. A minority report weaknesses in wet conditions and aquaplaning resistance, and some note slush performance can be shaky around 0°C. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with most users finding it a top-tier studless winter tire for harsh climates.

Based on 15 reviews with an average rating of 85%

Best Review for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
Given 82% 245/40 R20 on a combination of roads for 10,000 easy going miles
Nokian Hakka 10 is an exceptional tire in the worst winter conditions. Exceptional ice cornering, braking and acceleration. Quietest studded tire I have had to date. Tires still measure at 9/32nds after 10,000 kms of winter use. Only complaint is the tire gives you very little feedback on dry/wet conditions
Helpful 1187 - tire reviewed on October 9, 2022
View all Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
Given 93% 205/60 R16 on a combination of roads for 150 average miles
I live in middle-part of Sweden where the weather can be up and down. from practically rainy roads, to dry and out of nowhere snow&ice roads due to weather changes. I went from Studded tires(been using those for 12years now and wanted to switch up and see how it felt to use studless and am I amazed how far the it come? it's just magnificent, less road noise due to not studded but wow the performance is just unpeccable. They saying wet grip is not that good-okey-ish but for me they have been great, snow & ice is just as we all know .."they are hakka" for a reason.
Helpful 1358 - tire reviewed on December 30, 2022
View all Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

If your winter reality is frequent smooth ice and hard-packed snow, the Hakkapeliitta 10 is the safer, more decisive choice. It posts dominant margins in ice braking and traction (often ~30-45% better) and regularly tops snow braking, translating into shorter stops and easier getaways when roads are glassy. The trade-offs are familiar to studded tires: more noise, higher rolling resistance, weaker aquaplaning resistance, and less precision on dry asphalt.
For mixed Nordic use with long stretches of cleared, wet, or dry roads, the Hakkapeliitta R5 is the smarter daily companion. It typically brakes shorter in the dry, steers more cleanly in the wet, rides quieter, and uses less fuel. While its rough-ice and snow performance is competitive, it gives up meaningful grip on smooth ice versus the studded 10. Choose it if comfort, efficiency, and balanced on-road manners matter more than ultimate ice bite.
Bottom line: pick Hakkapeliitta 10 for maximum safety margin on ice-first climates; choose Hakkapeliitta R5 for civil, efficient winter driving where bare and wet roads are common.
Key Differences
  • Ice performance: Hakka 10 decisively ahead in braking/traction; R5 lags on smooth ice
  • Dry-road behavior: R5 stops shorter and feels more settled; Hakka 10 is slower to react
  • Wet dynamics: R5 generally handles better; Hakka 10 may brake slightly shorter in some tests
  • Aquaplaning: Both can be weak, but Hakka 10 often has higher straight-line aqua speed
  • Comfort/noise: R5 notably quieter and more comfortable; Hakka 10 is louder and harsher
  • Efficiency: R5 has lower rolling resistance and better fuel use; Hakka 10 consumes more
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Overall Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.