Maxxis Victra Sport 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
- TR Score
- 8.5/10
- Owners say
- -
- TR Score
- 8.8/10
- Owners say
- 73% · 25
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 finished ahead 2 times and the Victra Sport 6 once. The Victra Sport 6 had 17.7% lower rolling resistance; the Advan Sport V107 stopped 3% shorter in the dry.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 if you prioritize overall performance, dry braking safety margins, and wet-weather handling/aquaplaning stability-especially for faster road driving. Choose the Maxxis Victra Sport 6 if efficiency (low rolling resistance), lower noise, and lower upfront cost are the priorities, and you're willing to accept less secure wet-cornering feel and potentially faster wear.
Where the Victra Sport 6 is stronger
- Lower rolling resistance in both reported tests (e.g., 8.08 vs 10.1 kg/t in Autobild 2026), supporting better fuel/energy efficiency
- Strong straight-line wet braking in two of the three shared results (e.g., 28.7 m vs 30.6 m in the 52-tire braking test; 44.9 m vs 47.9 m in Autobild 2026)
- Refinement-focused road manners noted in EVO (quiet over rough surfaces, good impact absorption; strong road-route/refinement result)
Where the Advan Sport V107 is stronger
- Consistently shorter dry braking across all shared tests (three wins; typically ~3% advantage, e.g., 34.1 m vs 35.1 m)
- Stronger wet handling and driver confidence (Autobild wet handling 82.0 vs 80.7 km/h; subjective wet 7.3 vs 5.3; EVO subjective wet 58 vs 54)
- Better aquaplaning resistance in both straight and curved measures (Autobild straight 93.0 vs 89.2 km/h; EVO curved 16.03 vs 13.26 m/sec²)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Victra Sport 6 vs Advan Sport V107 at a glance
| Category | Victra Sport 6 | Gap | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won3 shared tests | 1 | 2 | |
| Dry8 measurements | 0 | The Advan Sport V107 stopped 3% shorter in the dry (3 tests) | 5 |
| Wet12 measurements | 2 | The Advan Sport V107 held 12.8% more grip in curved aquaplaning (2 tests) | 10 |
| Comfort2 measurements | 1 | Level between the two. | 1 |
| Value4 measurements | 2 | Level between the two. | 2 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.5/10 | The Advan Sport V107 by 0.3 | 8.8/10 |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Advan Sport V107 was dearer in 2 of 2 | +14.7% |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Victra Sport 6 | Field | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test | P18 of 20 | P13 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P15 of 50 | P18 of 50 | |
| 2025 EVO Summer Tire Test | P7 of 9 | P4 of 9 |
Performance profile
7 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Victra Sport 6
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 10 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Victra Sport 6
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Victra Sport 6 | Gap | Advan Sport V107 | Wins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 113 | 3% | 110 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 67.48 | 0.7% | 66.99 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 62.5 | 0.2% | 62.6 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 114 | 1.9% | 117 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 79.45 | 0.6% | 78.95 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 50.1 | 1.6% | 51 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 22.6% | scored | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 15.51 | 3.6% | 14.95 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 49.9 | 3.9% | 51.9 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 26.9 | 12.8% | 31.7 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 9% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 71.8 | 1.3 dB | 73.1 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 24,650 | 15% | 28,353 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 8.19 | 17.7% | 9.95 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 1,875 | 4.3% | 1,794 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Victra Sport 6 scores 8.5 and the Advan Sport V107 8.8 out of 10.
| Victra Sport 6 | Category | Advan Sport V107 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88 | Dry | 97 | ||
| 62 | Wet | 76 | ||
| 45 | Comfort | 14 | ||
| 24 | Value | 5 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Victra Sport 6 | Category | Advan Sport V107 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Dry Grip | 8.7 | ||
| - | Wet Grip | 7.4 | ||
| - | Road Feedback | 8.5 | ||
| - | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| - | Wear | 5.5 | ||
| - | Comfort | 6.3 | ||
Owners rate the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25 reviews; the Victra Sport 6 has no owner reviews yet. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Maxxis Victra Sport 6
No owner reviews yet. Be the first to review it →
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
- 73%from 25 reviews
- 54%would buy again
- 140,521 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners most consistently praise the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 for strong dry performance, with around three in five highlighting excellent dry grip and many also noting sharp steering and confident dry handling. Wet grip is generally rated as decent, though opinions are more mixed, with a small but notable group (around one in seven) finding it weaker, particularly in colder conditions. The biggest drawback is longevity: around two in five owners complain of very fast wear. Noise is another frequent issue, with around one in three reporting higher road roar, especially on rougher surfaces.
- Outstanding dry grip and confidence under power
- Very capable dry handling with strong feedback
- Direct, responsive steering feel
- Stiff, sporty sidewalls that support hard driving
- Very short tread life and rapid wear
- Noticeable road noise/roar, especially on coarse surfaces
- Needs heat or a bedding-in period to feel at its best
Summarised by AI from 24 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 25 Advan Sport V107 reviewsAmazing feel and handling, decent dry grip.
Awful comfort and wear rate.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
| Category | Victra Sport 6 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| On the market since | - | 2018 |
| Replaced | Maxxis Victra Sport 5 (2020) | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 (2010) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Advan Sport V107 was the dearer tire in 2 of the 2 tests that listed prices, by 14.7% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Maxxis' Victra Sport 6 and Yokohama's Advan Sport V107 both sit in the ultra-high-performance summer category, but they approach the brief from different angles. Across three shared professional tests (Autobild 2026 in 245/45 R19, Autobild's 52-tire braking test, and EVO's 235/35 R19 group test), the Yokohama more consistently delivers the “premium UHP” blend of crisp control and all-round pace, while the Maxxis tends to trade some outright dynamic sharpness for efficiency and a lower entry price.
The data shows a clear pattern: V107 repeatedly leads in dry braking and dry handling, and usually has the edge in wet handling and aquaplaning stability, which matters most for confidence when pushing on wet roads. The Victra Sport 6's strongest counters are rolling resistance (fuel/energy use) and, in two of the three shared datasets, shorter wet braking distances-though its wet-cornering behavior is repeatedly described as less confidence inspiring than the Yokohama's.
Conclusion
If you want the more complete performance tire, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is the safer pick on balance. It beat the Maxxis in overall placement in the two full comparative tests (Autobild: 13/20 vs 18/20; EVO: 4/9 vs 7/9) and it consistently stops shorter in the dry (three straight wins: e.g., 34.1 m vs 35.1 m in Autobild 2026; 32.0 m vs 33.08 m in EVO). It also tends to be the more capable wet “cornering package” with better wet lap/handling metrics and aquaplaning margins (Autobild straight aquaplaning 93.0 vs 89.2 km/h; EVO curved aquaplaning 16.03 vs 13.26 m/sec²), translating to higher stability and clearer feedback when conditions deteriorate.
The Maxxis Victra Sport 6 is best viewed as a value/efficiency-leaning UHP option rather than a class leader. It can be competitive in straight-line wet braking in some protocols (Autobild braking test: 28.7 m vs 30.6 m; Autobild 2026: 44.9 m vs 47.9 m), and it's notably more efficient (lower rolling resistance in both reported tests: 8.08 vs 10.1 kg/t in Autobild 2026; 8.3 vs 9.8 kg/t in EVO). However, its overall proposition is undermined by poorer wet-handling confidence (Autobild subjective wet: 5.3 vs 7.3) and significantly shorter projected wear life in the long-run cost picture (Autobild wear: 39,670 km vs 45,630 km), meaning the low purchase price doesn't automatically become the lowest cost-per-kilometer.
Practical takeaway: the V107 is the tire you choose for dependable, repeatable performance and wet-weather control; the Victra Sport 6 is the tire you choose if efficiency and initial outlay matter most-provided you drive within its wet-cornering limits and accept potentially higher wear.
Victra Sport 6 vs Advan Sport V107: your questions
Is the Maxxis Victra Sport 6 or the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 the better tire?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 finished ahead 2 times and the Victra Sport 6 once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Victra Sport 6 scores 8.5 and the Advan Sport V107 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Victra Sport 6 or the Advan Sport V107?
The Advan Sport V107 led 10 of the 12 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 12.8% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Advan Sport V107 led 5 of the 8 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Victra Sport 6 had 17.7% lower rolling resistance (2 tests).
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25 reviews; the Victra Sport 6 has no owner reviews yet.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Advan Sport V107 was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 14.7% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
9-1 in 10 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
3-2 in 5 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Pirelli P Zero PZ5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
1-1 in 2 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion