Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 to find out which tire is best for your own driving.
There are a few basic differences between the two tires. The Vredestein Ultrac Pro is an Max-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is an Ultra-High-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | four | |
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 | one |
While it might look like the Vredestein Ultrac Pro is better than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 2.51% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Dry Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 0.95% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 performed equally well in subj. dry handling tests.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 3.3% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 0.53% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was 0.13% faster around a wet lap than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro scored 8.75% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was 1.38% faster around a wet circle than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro floated at a 1% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro slipped out at a 0.63% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro scored 8.94% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during three noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro measured 2.04% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two wear tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is predicted to cover 0.6% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Wear: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two value tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 proved to have a 2.13% better value based on price/1000km than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Value: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro had a 18.73% lower rolling resistance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro lost 9.87% less particle wear matter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Vredestein Ultrac Pro Driver Reviews
Drivers largely praise the Vredestein Ultrac Pro for strong dry and wet grip, confident handling, and notably good ride comfort, with several noting premium feel and value. High-scoring reviews highlight short braking distances, stability, and decent wear for aggressive or heavy vehicles. A minority report concerns include poor performance in very cold (sub-5°C) conditions and one case of premature wear/delamination. Overall, the Ultrac Pro delivers balanced performance with comfort-focused tuning and attractive design.
Based on 6 reviews with an average rating of 81%
Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Driver Reviews
Drivers report the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 delivers strong dry grip, sharp handling, and confident wet performance when warm, with several high-scoring reviews praising its sporty feel and feedback (including on EVs). However, many note high road noise on coarse surfaces and notably fast tread wear, making it less ideal for daily comfort or longevity-focused use.
Based on 20 reviews with an average rating of 73%
Conclusion
In conclusion the Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed better in wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [km/h], subj. wet handling, wet circle, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, subj. comfort, noise, rolling resistance and abrasion, while the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], wear and value.
Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in dry handling, subj. dry handling, wet handling and fuel consumption, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.
Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Vredestein Ultrac Pro seems to be the best tire overall.
However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.
Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Overall Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Vredestein Ultrac Pro Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.