Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- TR Score
- 8.6/10
- Owners say
- 73% · 200
- TR Score
- 8.8/10
- Owners say
- 82% · 97
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tires, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 finished ahead 4 times and the Ventus Prime 4 once. The Turanza T005 had 14.6% lower rolling resistance; the Ventus Prime 4 lasted 16.1% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Bridgestone Turanza T005 for maximum wet safety margins, highway stability, and fuel economy (great for hybrids/EVs). Choose Hankook Ventus Prime 4 if you want sharper road feel, strong braking, longer tread life, and lower upfront cost.
Where the Turanza T005 is stronger
- Outstanding rolling resistance for top fuel efficiency
- Superior aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved)
- Consistently stable, precise wet handling
Where the Ventus Prime 4 is stronger
- Short braking distances on dry and often on wet
- Lively, confident subjective handling
- Better wear/mileage and abrasion results
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Turanza T005 vs Ventus Prime 4 at a glance
| Category | Turanza T005 | Gap | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won5 shared tests | 4 | 1 | |
| Dry9 measurements | 2 | 5 | |
| Wet19 measurements | 14 | The Turanza T005 held 13.4% more grip in curved aquaplaning (3 tests) | 5 |
| Comfort6 measurements | 2 | 3 | |
| Value7 measurements | 4 | The Turanza T005 had 14.6% lower rolling resistance (3 tests) | 3 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.6/10 | The Ventus Prime 4 by 0.2 | 8.8/10 |
| Owner rating200 and 97 reviews | 73% | The Ventus Prime 4 by 9 points | 82% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 57% | The Ventus Prime 4 by 16 points | 73% |
| Pricein the 4 tests that listed prices | +11.9% | The Turanza T005 was dearer in 4 of 4 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 138 | 56 sizes made in both | 66 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 5 tests, 2022 to 2023
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Turanza T005 | Field | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Motor Summer Tire Test | P3 of 8 | P7 of 8 | |
| 2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P4 of 50 | P9 of 50 | |
| Tire Reviews Best Summer Touring Tires | P3 of 13 | P7 of 13 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test | P4 of 21 | P2 of 21 | |
| 2022 Summer Tire Market Overview | P1 of 50 | P2 of 50 |
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Turanza T005
Ventus Prime 4
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 11 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Turanza T005
Ventus Prime 4
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Turanza T005
Not ahead in any category
Ventus Prime 4
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Turanza T005 73% from 200 reviews and the Ventus Prime 4 82% from 97. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Turanza T005 | Gap | Ventus Prime 4 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 119 | 0.1% | 118 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 54.18 | 0.4% | 53.99 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 59.2 | 0.8% | 59.7 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.9% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 133 | 2% | 129 | 2-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 128 | 9.2% | 116 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 85.81 | 1.4% | 87.04 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 46.5 | 0.5% | 46.3 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.6% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15.1 | 2.3% | 14.7 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.6 | 0.9% | 11.71 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 49.4 | 2.8% | 48.1 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.4 | 13.4% | 10.9 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69.63 | 0.2 dB | 69.45 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 | 15.4% | 20.1 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22,481 | 16.1% | 25,787 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.79 | 14.6% | 5.51 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.6 | 3.4% | 5.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 73.3 | 7.8% | 67.6 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza T005 scores 8.6 and the Ventus Prime 4 8.8 out of 10.
| Turanza T005 | Category | Ventus Prime 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | Dry | 82 | ||
| 80 | Wet | 71 | ||
| 27 | Comfort | 27 | ||
| 88 | Value | 80 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Turanza T005 | Category | Ventus Prime 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.1 | Dry Grip | 8.8 | ||
| 7.7 | Wet Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 7.3 | Road Feedback | 8.1 | ||
| 7.3 | Handling | 8.2 | ||
| 6.8 | Wear | 7.8 | ||
| 7.2 | Comfort | 8 | ||
Owners rate the Turanza T005 73% from 200 reviews and the Ventus Prime 4 82% from 97. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
- 73%from 200 reviews
- 57%would buy again
- 2,906,122 milesdriven by reviewers
Owner feedback on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 is mixed (average 68.6%), but most agree it delivers dependable everyday grip, particularly on dry roads and often in the wet too. Comfort and fuel efficiency are also frequent highlights, with many describing an easy, relaxed touring feel. The main drawbacks are refinement and longevity: around a third of owners complain about road noise, while tread life is debated and slightly leans negative overall, with many reporting quicker-than-expected wear. A smaller but notable group (around one in five) also dislike the steering feel, often describing it as light or lacking feedback, and a few report weak performance in cold weather.
- Strong dry grip and reassuring traction
- Confident wet grip for normal driving
- Comfortable, compliant ride
- Good dry handling and stability
- Noticeable road noise, especially at motorway speeds
- Tread life can be disappointing for the price
- Light or vague steering feel / limited feedback
Summarised by AI from 171 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 200 Turanza T005 reviewsEş zamanlı olarak hem turanza6 hem turanza5 kullanıyorum. Turanza6 kolay kolay kaymaz ve ABS açmazdı. Turanza5 daha 5000km olmasına rağmen ilk günden beri hem kuru, hem de ıslak zeminde orta/sert frende çok erken ABS açma meyilinde. Turanza6 ya göre belirgin daha sert ve konforsuz. Parasının hakkını veren bir lastik kesinlikle değil.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- 82%from 97 reviews
- 73%would buy again
- 1,056,322 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 highly overall (average 80.7%), most often praising its strong dry grip and confident, predictable dry handling, backed up by a comfortable, generally quiet ride. Wet grip is also widely seen as secure for a touring tire, with many calling it reassuring in heavy rain, though a minority report some instability or weaker aquaplaning resistance. The main recurring drawback is longevity: wear and performance consistency split opinion, with around one in four owners mentioning tread life and around one in ten saying grip drops off noticeably as the tire wears, sometimes accompanied by increased noise.
- Strong dry grip with plenty of traction
- Excellent dry handling and confidence in corners
- Comfortable, compliant ride quality
- Generally low road noise for a touring tire
- Tread life can be disappointing for some drivers
- Grip drops off as the tire wears
- Road noise can be noticeable on some surfaces
Summarised by AI from 87 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 97 Ventus Prime 4 reviewsNo complaints on Wet or Dry grip for everyday driving. It was a 2025 tire with 12k miles had to deal with a full blowout while driving. From a tropical climate with 99% indoor parking.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 138 sizes of the Turanza T005 and 66 of the Ventus Prime 4, 56 of them made in both.
| Category | Turanza T005 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 138 sizes, 14 to 22 inch | 66 sizes, 15 to 20 inch |
| Made in both | 56 sizes 195/50 R15195/55 R15195/45 R16195/50 R16195/55 R16205/45 R16205/50 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16205/65 R16215/55 R16215/60 R16and 44 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A64%B36%C0% | A88%B12% |
| EU label rolling resistance | B58%A29%C9%D3% | B47%C39%A14% |
| EU label noise | 66-74 dB B88%A12% | 68-71 dB A52%B48% |
| On the market since | 2016 | - |
| Replaced | Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo (2016) | Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
| Replaced by | Bridgestone Turanza 6 | - |
| Awards | - | Winner: Summer Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2023) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Turanza T005 was the dearer tire in 4 of the 4 tests that listed prices, by 11.9% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits two premium-touring summer staples against each other: Bridgestone's Turanza T005 and Hankook's Ventus Prime 4, both tested widely in 205/55 R16 and 215/55 R17. Across five shared tests, the Bridgestone typically ranked higher overall (4 wins vs. 1) and consistently impressed with class-leading efficiency and aquaplaning security.
The Hankook counters with sharper subjective handling, shorter braking on certain surfaces, stronger wear performance, and a clear price advantage. If you value maximum wet-safety margins in deeper water and fuel economy, the Bridgestone stands out; if you prioritize value, mileage, and lively feel, the Hankook makes a strong case.
Conclusion
Across multiple independent tests, the Turanza T005 establishes the broader safety and efficiency envelope: best-in-group rolling resistance (often ~15-20% advantage), repeated wins in straight/curved aquaplaning, and consistently high overall rankings. Its wet handling stability is a recurring strength, with only occasional average wet braking results noted.
The Ventus Prime 4 delivers excellent dry and wet braking in several tests, strong subjective handling feel, lower purchase price, and better projected mileage/abrasion, making it a value leader. For high-mileage drivers or budget-conscious buyers wanting engaging dynamics, Hankook fits perfectly. For drivers prioritizing all-weather wet security and fuel savings-especially hybrids/EVs-the Bridgestone is the safer, more efficient bet.
Turanza T005 vs Ventus Prime 4: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Turanza T005 or the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 the better tire?
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tires, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 finished ahead 4 times and the Ventus Prime 4 once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza T005 scores 8.6 and the Ventus Prime 4 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Turanza T005 or the Ventus Prime 4?
The Turanza T005 led 14 of the 19 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 13.4% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Ventus Prime 4 led 5 of the 9 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Turanza T005 had 14.6% lower rolling resistance (3 tests); the Ventus Prime 4 lasted 16.1% longer in the wear tests (2 tests). Owners rate wear 6.8/10 for the Turanza T005 and 7.8/10 for the Ventus Prime 4.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.2/10 for the Turanza T005 and 8/10 for the Ventus Prime 4.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Turanza T005 73% from 200 reviews and the Ventus Prime 4 82% from 97. 57% of Turanza T005 owners would buy it again, against 73% for the Ventus Prime 4.
Which is more expensive?
In the 4 tests that listed prices, the Turanza T005 was the dearer tire in 4 of them, by 11.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Turanza T005 is made in 138 sizes (14 to 22 inch) and the Ventus Prime 4 in 66 (15 to 20 inch). 56 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Turanza T005 is graded A for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Ventus Prime 4 A and B.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Michelin Primacy 5
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52
3-5 in 8 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
11-0 in 11 shared tests
vs
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
10-12 in 24 shared tests
vs
Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
10-6 in 16 shared tests
Every Bridgestone vs Hankook test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion