Menu

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 vs Vredestein Ultrac Pro

In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 and the Vredestein Ultrac Pro to find out which tire is best for your own driving.

The good news is that both the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro are Max Performance Summer tires designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars, which means comparing the two tires is relatively simple.

Both tires are hugely popular in the market place with drivers, and both have been featured in independent tire tests.

SportMaxx-RT-2 VS Ultrac-Pro

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of five total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2one
one wins
Vredestein Ultrac Profour
four wins

While it might look like the Vredestein Ultrac Pro is better than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 1.85% less distance than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
35.66M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
35.2M (+0.2M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
37.3M (+0.7M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
36.6M
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
35.2M (+0.2M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
35.3M (+1.1M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
34.2M
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
35.3M (+1.1M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
34.2M

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was 0.23% faster around a lap than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
108.95Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
109.2Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
118.2Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
117.4Km/H (-0.8Km/H)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
99.7Km/H (-1.3Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
101Km/H

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro scored 22.99% more points than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
6.7 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.7 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
6.7 Points (-2 Points)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.7 Points

Wet Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 1.02% less distance than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
37.34M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
36.96M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
31.5M (+0.3M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
31.2M
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
31.5M (+0.5M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
31M
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
49.1M (+0.3M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
48.8M
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
29.1M (+0.3M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
28.8M
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
45.5M (+0.5M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
45M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 1.57% less distance than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
38.1M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
37.5M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
38.1M (+0.6M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
37.5M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 was 0.19% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
76.95Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76.8Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
71.7Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.3Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
82.2Km/H (-0.1Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82.3Km/H

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro scored 8.75% more points than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
7.3 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
7.3 Points (-0.7 Points)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8 Points

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was 0.07% faster around a wet circle than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
14.98s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
14.97s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
14.98s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
15.24s (+0.26s)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
14.97s (+0.28s)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
14.69s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 floated at a 2.08% higher speed than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
85.17Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
83.4Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
81.2Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79.1Km/H (-2.1Km/H)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
81.1Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80.7Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
93.2Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
90.4Km/H (-2.8Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 slipped out at a 8.33% higher speed than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
3.48m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3.19m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
3.5m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3m/sec2 (-0.5m/sec2)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
3.45m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3.35m/sec2 (-0.1m/sec2)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
3.48m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3.23m/sec2 (-0.25m/sec2)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 scored 5.38% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
6.5 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
6.15 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
5 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5 Points
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
8 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
7.3 Points (-0.7 Points)

Noise

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during three noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro measured 1.14% quieter than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
72.93dB
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72.1dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
72.8dB (+1dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.8dB
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
73.6dB (+0.1dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
73.5dB
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
72.4dB (+1.4dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71dB

Wear

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 was better during three wear tests. On average the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 is predicted to cover 8.71% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
42036.67KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
38376.67KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
41700KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
40100KM (-1600KM)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
39590KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
32930KM (-6660KM)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
44820KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
42100KM (-2720KM)

Value

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 was better during one value tests. On average the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 proved to have a 3.48% better value based on price/1000km than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
12.21Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
12.65Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
11.7Price/1000 (+0.13Price/1000)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.57Price/1000
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
9.09Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.18Price/1000 (+2.09Price/1000)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
15.84Price/1000 (+0.64Price/1000)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
15.2Price/1000

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro had a 7.27% lower rolling resistance than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
9.08kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.42kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
9.41kg / t (+0.22kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
9.19kg / t
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
8.74kg / t (+1.09kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
7.65kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 used 1.75% less fuel than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
5.6l/100km
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.7l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
5.6l/100km
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.7l/100km (+0.1l/100km)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro lost 2.36% less particle wear matter than the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
1656g
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
1617g
Total weight loss after wear test in grams, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
1656g (+39g)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
1617g

Real World Driver Reviews

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 Driver Reviews

Most drivers find the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 confidence-inspiring with strong wet and dry grip, low noise, and good comfort, often noting solid aquaplaning resistance and decent wear for the category. However, many report soft sidewalls leading to vague or wobbly handling and reduced precision, and a minority cite rapid performance drop-off as they wear or isolated build issues. Overall sentiment skews positive given the large number of high-scoring reviews.

Based on 92 reviews with an average rating of 77%

Vredestein Ultrac Pro Driver Reviews

Drivers largely praise the Vredestein Ultrac Pro for strong dry and wet grip, confident handling, and notably good ride comfort, with several noting premium feel and value. High-scoring reviews highlight short braking distances, stability, and decent wear for aggressive or heavy vehicles. A minority report concerns include poor performance in very cold (sub-5°C) conditions and one case of premature wear/delamination. Overall, the Ultrac Pro delivers balanced performance with comfort-focused tuning and attractive design.

Based on 6 reviews with an average rating of 81%

Best Review for the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
Given 83% 265/45 R18 on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
Solid tire. 12k miles done. Back 5.6, front 5.9 Mercedes 350 265/45/18 rear 245/50/18 front. Can't fault them. Will go for another set. Traction perfect, drives like a train. No skids, no aquaplaning so far. Wear ok/even. Average driving style. Got me out of trouble once... Hard breaking ABS on... Avoided dropped container.
Helpful 1157 - tire reviewed on February 21, 2023
View all Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Given 97% 245/40 R18 on a combination of roads for 300 spirited miles
I do a lot of research when I buy tires , I looked all around for a premium summer tire which would be suitable for my driving style, and for the condition of the roads in my country - Eastern Europe. I looked at the PilotSport 5, ContiSportContact 7 , Eagle F1 Assymetric - all of which have a very high rating overrall, but I felt that they weren't suitable for the road conditions - lots of bumps ,cracks on the roads, patches and lets never forget about the potholes. They say the PS5 doesn't really absorb much of the bumps and has a low aquaplaning score, which doesn't do the job for me. I... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1137 - tire reviewed on June 17, 2024
View all Vredestein Ultrac Pro driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 performed better in wet handling [km/h], straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, subj. comfort, wear, value and fuel consumption, while the Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], subj. dry handling, wet braking, wet braking - concrete, subj. wet handling, wet circle, noise, rolling resistance and abrasion.

Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in dry handling and wet handling, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.

Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Vredestein Ultrac Pro seems to be the best tire overall.

However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.

Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Overall Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Vredestein Ultrac Pro Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.