Menu

Linglong Sport Master Winter vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

This head-to-head pits two very different winter propositions against each other: Linglong's Sport Master Winter, a budget-oriented touring tire built for everyday passenger cars, versus Michelin's Pilot Alpin 5, an ultra-high-performance (UHP) winter tire aimed at drivers who demand top-tier control and safety. Across three shared independent tests in 225/40 R18 and 245/45 R19 sizes, Michelin swept all overall victories while Linglong finished mid-to-lower table.
The numbers frame a clear story. Michelin consistently stops shorter in the wet and snow (often by 3-7%), shows stronger snow traction, and delivers more stable wet/dry handling with far lower noise and rolling resistance. Linglong counters with attractive purchase price and a couple of bright spots-quick dry handling lap times in one test and strong subjective dry feel-plus favorable price-per-1,000 km in one dataset. The question is whether those few gains offset Michelin's broad, safety-critical advantages.
Sport-Master-Winter VS Pilot-Alpin-5

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of three total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5three
three wins

While it might look like the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is better than the Linglong Sport Master Winter purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Competitive dry handling pace and strong subjective dry feel in one test
  • Low purchase price and strong headline value scores in two tests
  • Respectable wet lateral grip noted, with balanced dry-road manners
  • Acceptable comfort scores comparable to premium rivals
  • Class-leading wet and snow braking (≈3-7% shorter stops across tests)
  • Superior snow traction and handling stability
  • Excellent longevity and low wear (up to ~46,750 km) with low rolling resistance
  • Very quiet and refined ride; balanced, predictable handling

Dry Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 2.97% less distance than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
43.8M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
42.5M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
44.2M (+1.6M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
42.6M
Linglong Sport Master Winter
43.4M (+1M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
42.4M

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter was 0.92% faster around a lap than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
75.2s
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
75.9s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
75.2s
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
75.9s (+0.7s)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 1.29% faster around a lap than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
115.2Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
116.7Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
115.2Km/H (-1.5Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
116.7Km/H

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter scored 20% more points than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
25 Points
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
20 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
25 Points
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
20 Points (-5 Points)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 6.36% less distance than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
48.3M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
45.23M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
35.7M (+2.5M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
33.2M
Linglong Sport Master Winter
55.8M (+3.9M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
51.9M
Linglong Sport Master Winter
53.4M (+2.8M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
50.6M

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 3.03% faster around a wet lap than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
89.1s
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
86.4s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
89.1s (+2.7s)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
86.4s

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 3.84% faster around a wet lap than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
80.2Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
83.4Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
80.2Km/H (-3.2Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
83.4Km/H

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scored 24.24% more points than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
25 Points
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
33 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
25 Points (-8 Points)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
33 Points

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 2.76% faster around a wet circle than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
12.67s
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
12.32s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
12.66s (+0.54s)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
12.12s
Linglong Sport Master Winter
12.67s (+0.15s)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
12.52s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 floated at a 2.39% higher speed than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
79.75Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
81.7Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
71.6Km/H (-3.6Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
75.2Km/H
Linglong Sport Master Winter
87.9Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
88.2Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 slipped out at a 10.31% higher speed than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
2m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.23m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
2m/sec2 (-0.23m/sec2)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.23m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 4.09% less distance than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
28.33M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
27.17M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
28.7M (+0.9M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
27.8M
Linglong Sport Master Winter
28.7M (+0.9M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
27.8M
Linglong Sport Master Winter
27.6M (+1.7M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
25.9M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had 10.62% better snow traction than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
2715.5N
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3038N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
2341N (-160N)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2501N
Linglong Sport Master Winter
3090N (-485N)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3575N

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 5.03% faster around a lap than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
71.6s
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
68s
Snow handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
71.6s (+3.6s)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
68s

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 2.87% faster around a lap than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
57.6Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
59.3Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
57.6Km/H (-1.7Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
59.3Km/H

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scored 40% more points than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
15 Points
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
25 Points
Subjective Snow Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
15 Points (-10 Points)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
25 Points

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 provided 7.98% more lateral grip than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
3.46ms/2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3.76ms/2
Lateral snow grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Snow Circle: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
3.46ms/2 (-0.3ms/2)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3.76ms/2

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.36% faster through a slalom than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
2.8m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.81m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
2.8m/sec2 (-0.01m/sec2)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.81m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
7.65 Points
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
7.65 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tires performed equally well

Linglong Sport Master Winter
7.3 Points
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
7.3 Points
Linglong Sport Master Winter
8 Points
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
8 Points

Noise

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two noise tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 measured 4.15% quieter than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
71.05dB
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
68.1dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
65.9dB (+0.9dB)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
65dB
Linglong Sport Master Winter
76.2dB (+5dB)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
71.2dB

Wear

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is predicted to cover 20.56% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
37305KM
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
46960KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
46110KM (-1060KM)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
47170KM
Linglong Sport Master Winter
28500KM (-18250KM)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
46750KM

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during two value tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter proved to have a 41.67% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
5.6Price/1000
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
9.6Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
7.81Price/1000
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
13.36Price/1000 (+5.55Price/1000)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
3.38Price/1000
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
5.83Price/1000 (+2.45Price/1000)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had a 16.92% lower rolling resistance than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
9.99kg / t
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
8.3kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
10.37kg / t (+1.67kg / t)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
8.7kg / t
Linglong Sport Master Winter
9.6kg / t (+1.7kg / t)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
7.9kg / t

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 wore 45.45% less per 1000km driven than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
0.22mm/1000km
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0.12mm/1000km
Millimetre of tread lost per 1000km driven, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Linglong Sport Master Winter
0.215mm/1000km (+0.09mm/1000km)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0.124mm/1000km

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Linglong Sport Master Winter and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

In total the Linglong Sport Master Winter has been reviewed 3 times and drivers have given the tire 83% overall.

The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 has been reviewed 29 times and drivers have given the tire 86% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Best Review for the Linglong Sport Master Winter
Given 80% 255/40 R19 on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
First impressions of the tire are very satisfactory. They perform well on dry and wet roads. I haven't had a chance to test them on snow and ice yet. Comfort is good, but as expected, the tires are noisy and the car consumes more fuel with winter tires than with summer tires.

At the time of purchase, the tires were 3x cheaper than mid brands and even 5x cheaper than premium brands. That's why I decided to buy them and check whether it is necessary to buy expensive tires for normal driving conditions and usual driving style. My conclusion is that Linglong sport master winter... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 222 - tire reviewed on January 1, 2026
View all Linglong Sport Master Winter driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Given 81% 205/60 R16 H on mostly country roads for 76,000 spirited miles
This is by far the best winter I have used. I live in the alps and use every weekend to go from 300m to 1740m ski ressort. I have needed to chain up even with 30cm snow. On the packed snow/ice no issues even from standing start on gradient. Knowing the road I push the corners and straights with the knowledge they do not let me down
Helpful 1316 - tire reviewed on November 5, 2018
View all Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is the decisive all-round winner. It leads where winter tires matter most: emergency braking and controllability on wet and snow. Typical gaps of ~5-7% in wet braking and ~3% in snow braking translate into meaningful real-world stopping distance margins. Add superior aquaplaning resistance, better snow traction, quieter operation (~71 vs ~76 dB in one test), lower rolling resistance, and outstanding longevity (up to ~46,750 km vs ~28,500 km in AZ), and the Michelin delivers both safety and long-term value despite its higher upfront price.
Linglong Sport Master Winter has flashes of competence-particularly a quick dry handling lap and decent subjective dry balance-but it trails markedly on snow braking (often the weakest result in-group) and shows elevated wear, noise, and rolling resistance in key testing. It can appeal on purchase price, and may suit mild climates with infrequent snow, but it's a compromise in core winter safety. For most buyers, especially those facing regular precipitation or snow, the Pilot Alpin 5 is the confident choice and the better total-cost proposition over the life of the tire.
Key Differences
  • Safety-critical braking: Michelin stops shorter on wet and snow in all shared tests (e.g., 33.2 m vs 35.7 m wet; 27.8 m vs 28.7 m snow).
  • Snow mobility: Michelin delivers higher traction (e.g., 3575 N vs 3090 N) and faster snow handling; Linglong ranks lowest for snow safety in AZ.
  • Wet control and aquaplaning: Michelin leads wet handling, circle, and aquaplaning metrics; Linglong shows longer wet braking and weaker curved aquaplaning.
  • Efficiency and longevity: Michelin has markedly lower rolling resistance (≈16-18% better) and significantly higher projected mileage; Linglong shows higher abrasion in AZ.
  • Noise and comfort: Michelin runs quieter (≈71 vs 76 dB in AZ) with similar or better subjective comfort.
  • Price vs true value: Linglong is cheaper to buy, but Michelin's longer life and lower fuel drag improve cost-per-km over time.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Overall Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Linglong Sport Master Winter Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.