Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Across six shared professional tests (multiple sizes and vehicle types), the Michelin is the more consistent overall winner (6/6 overall placements ahead), typically pairing sharper dry-road performance with very strong snow safety and notably lower noise. The Bridgestone's pattern is different: it repeatedly shows excellent wet-road confidence and aquaplaning security in several tests, plus clearly better rolling resistance/efficiency, making it particularly appealing for cold, wet climates and efficiency-minded drivers.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | six |
While it might look like the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is better than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Strong wet-road balance and confidence; frequently wins wet handling/circle metrics (e.g., wet handling 75.4 vs 74.3 km/h in the 2025 High Performance test)
- Class-leading efficiency/low rolling resistance in shared data (wins 3/3 where reported, e.g., 7.6 vs 7.9 kg/t in AZ; 8.54 vs 8.7 in Auto Bild; 7.49 vs 7.66 in SUV test)
- Competitive winter capability with particularly strong subjective snow safety in AZ (29 vs 25 subjective snow; 29/30 driving safety noted for snow)
- Often strong aquaplaning security in Auto Bild-style testing (e.g., curved aquaplaning advantage in Auto Bild 2025: 2.45 vs 2.23 m/s²)
- Most consistent overall performer across shared tests (ahead overall in 6/6, including multiple #1 finishes)
- Superior dry braking and crisp on-road performance; wins dry braking in 5 shared results (e.g., 41.1 vs 43.5 m; 42.4 vs 45.2 m; 41.4 vs 43.8 m)
- Typically stronger objective snow braking/traction/handling outcomes across the dataset (snow braking wins 5; snow traction wins 4)
- Quieter, more refined ride in measured noise results (wins noise 5/5, typically ~1-3 dB lower; e.g., 71.8 vs 74.8 dB in 2025 High Performance)
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 5.32% less distance than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Dry Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.52% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.73% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 scored 13.04% more points than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 2.02% less distance than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 stopped the vehicle in 1.08% less distance than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 1.93% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.21% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 scored 2.94% more points than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had 4.65% higher lateral wet grip than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 floated at a 1.37% higher speed than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 slipped out at a 2.64% higher speed than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during five snow braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 1.25% less distance than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during four snow traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had 2.6% better snow traction than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.15% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.86% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 scored 13.79% more points than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 provided 2.59% more lateral grip than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Snow Circle: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 1.46% faster through a slalom than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 stopped the vehicle 0.61% shorter than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Ice Braking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during five noise tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 measured 2.41% quieter than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Noise: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is predicted to cover 6.51% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one value tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 proved to have a 9.06% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Value: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had a 1.99% lower rolling resistance than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 wore 20% less per 1000km driven than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Abrasion: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
In total the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has been reviewed 6 times and drivers have given the tire 90% overall.
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 has been reviewed 29 times and drivers have given the tire 86% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Conclusion
The Bridgestone Blizzak 6, however, shouldn't be dismissed as merely “second best.” It has a clear, repeatable advantage in efficiency (rolling resistance wins 3/3 where reported) and frequently looks exceptionally trustworthy on wet roads and in certain aquaplaning metrics-sometimes by a lot (e.g., in the 2025 High Performance test, Michelin leads curved aquaplaning by ~21.5%, but Bridgestone counters with better wet braking/handling; in other tests like Auto Bild 2025, Bridgestone leads curved aquaplaning by ~9.9%). If your winter is dominated by cold rain, standing water, and mixed temperatures-and you value efficiency and wet stability-the Blizzak 6 is a very rational choice. Practical takeaway: Michelin is the more consistently “best overall,” while Bridgestone is the smart pick when efficiency and wet confidence are top priorities (and you can accept a small step back in dry braking refinement and cabin quietness).
Key Differences
- Overall consistency: Michelin beats Bridgestone on overall ranking in all six shared tests, suggesting broader “no-weak-links” performance across conditions and sizes.
- Dry braking gap is meaningful and repeatable: Michelin is ~4-6% shorter in multiple tests (e.g., 41.1 m vs 43.5 m; 42.4 m vs 45.2 m; 40.7 m vs 42.5 m), which is a real safety margin on cold asphalt.
- Wet performance is more nuanced: Bridgestone often feels/grades very secure and can win wet braking/handling in some datasets, but Michelin also frequently posts the faster objective wet handling/braking (e.g., Auto Bild 2025 wet braking 51.9 m vs 54.7 m).
- Aquaplaning split: Bridgestone can lead in some aquaplaning scenarios (notably curved aquaplaning in Auto Bild 2025), while Michelin can dominate others (e.g., 2025 High Performance curved aquaplaning 1.75 vs 1.44 m/s², a large advantage).
- Refinement: Michelin is consistently quieter (wins noise 5/5), which matters for daily drivers and long motorway winter trips.
- Ownership economics diverge by test: Michelin often leads wear/mileage (AZ +17.6%, ADAC +16.1%) and abrasion, while Bridgestone more consistently leads rolling resistance (efficiency).
Overall Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.